Revise a change's existing planning artifacts and keep them coherent. Never edit code.
Store selection: If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run openspec store list --json to discover registered store ids, then pass --store <id> on the commands that read or write specs and changes (new change, status, instructions, list, show, validate, archive, doctor, context, schemas, view). Once selected, treat --store <id> as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>", not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local openspec/ root.
Input: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
/openspec-continue-change is an optional workflow and may not be installed. Before suggesting it anywhere below, verify that it is available. If it is unavailable, openspec status --change "<name>" --json shows the next artifact and openspec instructions "<artifact-id>" --change "<name>" --json explains how to create it.
Steps
Select the change
If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
- Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
- Auto-select if only one active change exists
- If ambiguous, run
openspec list --json to get available changes sorted by most recently modified, and ask the user to select one
When prompting, present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:
- Change name
- Schema (from
schema field if present, otherwise "spec-driven")
- Status (e.g., "0/5 tasks", "complete", "no tasks")
- How recently it was modified (from
lastModified field)
Mark the most recently modified change as "(Recommended)" since it's likely what the user wants to update.
Always announce: "Using change: " and how to override (e.g., /openspec-update-change <other>).
Get the change's artifacts
openspec status --change "<name>" --json
Parse the JSON to understand current state. The response includes:
schemaName: The workflow schema being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
artifacts: Array of artifacts with their status ("done", "skipped", "ready", "blocked")
isPlanningComplete: Boolean indicating if all planning artifacts are complete. Older CLI versions expose the same value as isComplete.
planningHome, changeRoot, artifactPaths, and actionContext: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
The artifact ids and paths come from the active schema - do NOT assume them, and do NOT branch on hardcoded artifact names. Custom schemas must work unchanged.
The files to edit are artifactPaths.<id>.existingOutputPaths - the concrete files that exist on disk, already glob-expanded for glob artifacts (e.g. specs/**/*.md). Do NOT write to resolvedOutputPath: for a glob artifact it is still the glob pattern, not a real file.
Understand the request
- If the user asked for a specific revision ("the design now uses X"), that is the starting edit.
- If they only said "update" / "make this coherent", treat it as a coherence review: read the existing artifacts and check them against each other for contradictions, gaps, and duplication.
Read and reconcile
- Read the artifact(s) the request touches and the change's other existing artifacts.
- Apply the requested edit. Then check every other existing artifact against it - in ANY direction: an edit to a later artifact may require revising an earlier one, not only the other way around. Build order is a useful reading order, not a constraint on which artifacts may be revised.
- Note everything that is now inconsistent, missing, or contradictory.
- Revise only files that already exist (
existingOutputPaths). Do NOT create artifacts that don't exist yet, and do NOT invent new files under a glob artifact - note them and point the user to /openspec-continue-change to create them.
- If the change is already coherent, say so and make no edits.
Confirm and apply, one artifact at a time
Point to the next step (guidance only - NEVER act on it)
- Artifacts still missing -> suggest
/openspec-continue-change to create them.
- Change already implemented (tasks checked off / already applied) -> the code may no longer match the revised plan; suggest
/openspec-apply-change to carry the delta into code.
- Everything done and implemented -> suggest
/openspec-archive-change.
Output
After each invocation, show:
- Which artifacts were revised (and which proposed revisions were rejected)
- Anything deferred to
/openspec-continue-change (not-yet-created artifacts or files)
- Where the change stands and the recommended next command
Guardrails
- Planning artifacts only - NEVER edit implementation code. If the revised plan implies code changes, stop and point to
/openspec-apply-change.
- Use the artifact ids and paths reported by
openspec status; never branch on hardcoded artifact names.
- Edit only the concrete files in
existingOutputPaths; never write to a glob resolvedOutputPath.
- Do not advance the build frontier: no new artifacts, no new files under glob artifacts - that is
/openspec-continue-change's job.
- Confirm every edit with the user before writing.
- If the request changes the change's intent rather than refining it, first verify whether the optional
/openspec-new-change workflow is available. If it is, recommend starting fresh with /openspec-new-change (the "Update vs. Start Fresh" heuristic). If it is unavailable, ask for a distinct unused change name and recommend openspec new change "<new-change-name>" instead.
1---2name: openspec-update-change3description: Update an OpenSpec change by revising its existing planning artifacts and keeping them coherent with one another. Use when the user wants to revise a change's plan, fold new decisions into it, or reconcile its artifacts after an edit. Never edits code.4license: MIT5---6
7Revise a change's existing planning artifacts and keep them coherent. Never edit code.
8
9**Store selection:** If the user names a store (a store is a standalone OpenSpec repo registered on this machine) or the work lives in one, run `openspec store list --json` to discover registered store ids, then pass `--store <id>` on the commands that read or write specs and changes (`new change`, `status`, `instructions`, `list`, `show`, `validate`, `archive`, `doctor`, `context`, `schemas`, `view`). Once selected, treat `--store <id>` as sticky for the rest of the workflow. Every unscoped example of those commands below is shorthand: before running it, append the flag. For example, run `openspec status --change "<name>" --json --store "<id>"`, not the unscoped form shown below. Other commands do not take the flag. Hints printed by commands already carry the flag; keep it on follow-ups. Without a store, commands act on the nearest local `openspec/` root.
10
11**Input**: Optionally specify a change name. If omitted, check if it can be inferred from conversation context. If vague or ambiguous you MUST prompt for available changes.
12
13`/openspec-continue-change` is an optional workflow and may not be installed. Before suggesting it anywhere below, verify that it is available. If it is unavailable, `openspec status --change "<name>" --json` shows the next artifact and `openspec instructions "<artifact-id>" --change "<name>" --json` explains how to create it.
14
15**Steps**
16
171. **Select the change**
18
19 If a name is provided, use it. Otherwise:
20 - Infer from conversation context if the user mentioned a change
21 - Auto-select if only one active change exists
22 - If ambiguous, run `openspec list --json` to get available changes sorted by most recently modified, and ask the user to select one
23
24 When prompting, present the top 3-4 most recently modified changes as options, showing:
25 - Change name
26 - Schema (from `schema` field if present, otherwise "spec-driven")
27 - Status (e.g., "0/5 tasks", "complete", "no tasks")
28 - How recently it was modified (from `lastModified` field)
29
30 Mark the most recently modified change as "(Recommended)" since it's likely what the user wants to update.
31
32 Always announce: "Using change: <name>" and how to override (e.g., `/openspec-update-change <other>`).
33
342. **Get the change's artifacts**
35 ```bash
36 openspec status --change "<name>" --json
37 ```
38 Parse the JSON to understand current state. The response includes:
39 - `schemaName`: The workflow schema being used (e.g., "spec-driven")
40 - `artifacts`: Array of artifacts with their status ("done", "skipped", "ready", "blocked")
41 - `isPlanningComplete`: Boolean indicating if all planning artifacts are complete. Older CLI versions expose the same value as `isComplete`.
42 - `planningHome`, `changeRoot`, `artifactPaths`, and `actionContext`: path and scope context. Use these instead of assuming repo-local paths.
43
44 The artifact ids and paths come from the active schema - do NOT assume them, and do NOT branch on hardcoded artifact names. Custom schemas must work unchanged.
45
46 The files to edit are `artifactPaths.<id>.existingOutputPaths` - the concrete files that exist on disk, already glob-expanded for glob artifacts (e.g. `specs/**/*.md`). Do NOT write to `resolvedOutputPath`: for a glob artifact it is still the glob pattern, not a real file.
47
483. **Understand the request**
49 - If the user asked for a specific revision ("the design now uses X"), that is the starting edit.
50 - If they only said "update" / "make this coherent", treat it as a coherence review: read the existing artifacts and check them against each other for contradictions, gaps, and duplication.
51
524. **Read and reconcile**
53 - Read the artifact(s) the request touches and the change's other existing artifacts.
54 - Apply the requested edit. Then check every other existing artifact against it - in ANY direction: an edit to a later artifact may require revising an earlier one, not only the other way around. Build order is a useful reading order, not a constraint on which artifacts may be revised.
55 - Note everything that is now inconsistent, missing, or contradictory.
56 - Revise only files that already exist (`existingOutputPaths`). Do NOT create artifacts that don't exist yet, and do NOT invent new files under a glob artifact - note them and point the user to `/openspec-continue-change` to create them.
57 - If the change is already coherent, say so and make no edits.
58
595. **Confirm and apply, one artifact at a time**
60 - Show each proposed revision and why. Write only after the user confirms.
61 - If the user rejects a revision, do not write it - leave that artifact unchanged.
62 - When a substantial rewrite is needed, get that artifact's rules and template first:
63 ```bash
64 openspec instructions "<artifact-id>" --change "<name>" --json
65 ```
66
676. **Point to the next step (guidance only - NEVER act on it)**
68 - Artifacts still missing -> suggest `/openspec-continue-change` to create them.
69 - Change already implemented (tasks checked off / already applied) -> the code may no longer match the revised plan; suggest `/openspec-apply-change` to carry the delta into code.
70 - Everything done and implemented -> suggest `/openspec-archive-change`.
71
72**Output**
73
74After each invocation, show:
75- Which artifacts were revised (and which proposed revisions were rejected)
76- Anything deferred to `/openspec-continue-change` (not-yet-created artifacts or files)
77- Where the change stands and the recommended next command
78
79**Guardrails**
80- Planning artifacts only - NEVER edit implementation code. If the revised plan implies code changes, stop and point to `/openspec-apply-change`.
81- Use the artifact ids and paths reported by `openspec status`; never branch on hardcoded artifact names.
82- Edit only the concrete files in `existingOutputPaths`; never write to a glob `resolvedOutputPath`.
83- Do not advance the build frontier: no new artifacts, no new files under glob artifacts - that is `/openspec-continue-change`'s job.
84- Confirm every edit with the user before writing.
85- If the request changes the change's *intent* rather than refining it, first verify whether the optional `/openspec-new-change` workflow is available. If it is, recommend starting fresh with `/openspec-new-change` (the "Update vs. Start Fresh" heuristic). If it is unavailable, ask for a distinct unused change name and recommend `openspec new change "<new-change-name>"` instead.