Weekly Review

Given a weekly note (a weekly/YYYY-WNN.md file or free-form weekly summary), produce exactly five labeled bullets in the format specified below. Output only the five bullets — no intro, no extra text, no explanation.

Focus Check

• One sentence: did the work this week align with the declared week priorities?
• Reference specific tasks or themes from the note. If no priorities are stated, infer from the work described.
• If more than half the work was unplanned or off-priority, append [DRIFT] at the end.

Cross-team Quality

• One sentence: were there cross-team interactions, and did they produce a durable artifact or outcome?
• Name the other team(s) if mentioned in the note.
• Append exactly one tag inline: [cross-team signal] if a high-impact interaction is evident; [no cross-team signal] if the week was primarily squad-internal.

Priority Shift

• One sentence: what, if anything, should change next week — stop, start, or continue — based on the week's evidence?
• Ground the shift in a specific signal from the note (e.g., a blocked dependency, a recurring theme, a missed outcome).
• If no shift is warranted, write: "Continue current trajectory — no adjustment needed."

Priority Judgment

• One sentence: given the planned items for this week, flag anything that appears out of scope or low-impact relative to the declared priorities.
• If an item from the Planned or Done section appears disconnected from stated priorities, name it explicitly.
• If Impact Items are listed in the note, assess whether any warrant moving to next week's Planned list.
• If all planned work appears on-scope, write: "All planned work aligns with stated priorities — no scope flag." Append [no scope flag].
• Otherwise append [scope flag: <item name>].

Mentorship Signal

• One sentence: did any mentorship or coaching activity occur this week — planned or incidental?
• Name the person(s) mentored if mentioned, and describe what was addressed (e.g., agenda-setting, scope clarification, technical approach, career growth).
• Append exactly one tag inline: [mentorship signal] if a concrete interaction is evident; [no mentorship signal] if none is mentioned.
• If a durable artifact resulted (note, doc, changed approach), name it.

Output format (use this exact structure, no extra lines):

Focus Check: [DRIFT if applicable] Cross-team Quality: [cross-team signal | no cross-team signal] Priority Shift: Priority Judgment: [scope flag: | no scope flag] Mentorship Signal: [mentorship signal | no mentorship signal]