wuyue12-tech Academic Paper Reviewer
Systematic paper review assistant for researchers and educators.
When to Use
- User asks to review a teaching/research paper
- User wants structural review, argument logic check, or academic standards check
- User wants to verify citations and policy document references
- User requests revision suggestions
Review Framework
1. Structural Review
| Section | Check Points |
|---|---|
| Title | Accuracy, conciseness |
| Abstract | Research question, methods, conclusions; word count |
| Introduction | Sufficient background, clear problem statement, significance |
| Literature Review | Key literature coverage, critical analysis, research gap |
| Methodology | Method appropriateness, data sources, research design rigor |
| Results & Analysis | Complete data presentation, depth of analysis, figure/table standards |
| Conclusion | Addresses research question, theoretical contribution, limitations & outlook |
| References | Format consistency, recent 5-year literature, authoritative sources |
2. Argument Logic Check
- Core argument clarity — Does the paper have a clear central claim?
- Reasoning chain completeness — Is the evidence→reasoning→conclusion chain closed?
- Concept consistency — Are key terms defined consistently throughout?
- Causal inference caution — Does it confuse correlation with causation?
- Counter-evidence handling — Are opposing views adequately addressed?
3. Policy Document Verification
For education papers citing policy documents:
- Chinese official documents: Verify via moe.gov.cn (Ministry of Education)
- Curriculum standards: Verify edition and content of official curriculum standards
- International documents: Verify OECD, UNESCO report citations
4. Academic Standards Check
- Plagiarism detection flags (unattributed large-scale quoting)
- Data ethics (student data privacy concerns)
- Figure/table standards (source attribution, readability)
- Academic language (colloquialisms, excessive subjective expressions)
Output Format
# Paper Review Report
## Basic Information
- Paper Title:
- Author:
- Review Date:
## Overall Assessment
(One paragraph summarizing paper quality)
## Rubric Scores (1-5)
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|-----------|-------|-------|
| Topic Value | | |
| Literature Review | | |
| Methodology | | |
| Argument Logic | | |
| Academic Standards | | |
| Innovation | | |
## Specific Issues & Revision Suggestions
### Major Issues (Must Fix)
1. ...
### General Issues (Suggested)
1. ...
### Minor Issues (Optional)
1. ...
## Strengths
1. ...
Typical Workflow
- User provides paper text or file
- Review by framework categories
- Verify key citations and policy references (use web search)
- Generate structured review report
- If requested, deep-dive on specific aspects