The NL-TDD Cycle
1. Write spec (.nlpm-test/artifact-name.spec.md) — define expectations
2. /nlpm:test — RED: spec fails (artifact doesn't exist)
3. Write the artifact — create the NL artifact
4. /nlpm:test — check if it passes
5. /nlpm:score — check quality score
6. Iterate until GREEN: all specs pass + score ≥ threshold
Spec File Format
Location: .nlpm-test/ directory in the project root (or alongside the artifact).
Filename convention: <artifact-name>.spec.md — matches the artifact filename without path.
---
artifact: agents/my-agent.md # path to the artifact being tested
type: agent # agent | skill | command | rule | hook | prompt
min_score: 85 # minimum /nlpm:score threshold for this artifact
---
Body sections (all optional — include what matters for this artifact):
triggers_on (skills and agents)
## Triggers On
Queries that SHOULD trigger this artifact:
- "review my database migrations before deploying"
- "check if these schema changes are safe"
- "audit the migration for breaking changes"
does_not_trigger_on (skills and agents)
## Does Not Trigger On
Queries that should NOT trigger this artifact:
- "write a migration for adding a users table"
- "help me with CSS styling"
- "deploy to production"
output_contains (agents and commands)
## Output Contains
Expected elements in the output:
- "## Migration Review" (heading present)
- "| Table | Change | Risk |" (table structure)
- severity classification (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
output_format (agents and commands)
## Output Format
The output should be a markdown report with:
1. Summary section with counts
2. Findings table with columns: File, Finding, Severity
3. Action items list
handles_input (commands)
## Handles Input
| Input | Expected Behavior |
|-------|------------------|
| (empty) | Score all artifacts in cwd |
| directory path | Score artifacts in that directory |
| nonexistent path | Error: "Directory not found: {path}" |
| file path | Score that single file |
follows_rules (rules)
## Follows Rules
Code that SHOULD comply:
```python
result: Result[User, AppError] = get_user(id)
Code that SHOULD violate:
user = get_user(id).unwrap() # should be flagged
### frontmatter_valid (all types)
```markdown
## Frontmatter Valid
Required fields:
- description: present and trigger-style ("Use when...")
- model: sonnet
- tools: [Read, Glob, Grep]
- skills: [nlpm:conventions, nlpm:scoring]
Test Results Format
NLPM Test Report
Spec Artifact Result Details
─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
my-agent.spec.md agents/my-agent.md PASS 5/5 checks
my-skill.spec.md skills/core/SKILL.md FAIL 3/5 checks
✗ Trigger: "optimize React hooks" → predicted NO trigger (expected YES)
✗ Score: 68/100 (min: 85)
Overall: 1 passed, 1 failed (50%)
RED items (fix these):
1. skills/core/SKILL.md — trigger gap: "optimize React hooks" not covered by description
2. skills/core/SKILL.md — score 68 < min 85: missing <example> blocks (-15)
Best Practices for Specs
- Write specs BEFORE writing the artifact (TDD discipline)
- 5-10 trigger queries for skills/agents (mix positive and negative)
- Include edge cases in
handles_inputfor commands min_scoreshould match your project's threshold (default 85 for new artifacts, 70 for legacy)- Specs are living documents — update when behavior requirements change
Spec File Discovery
The tester discovers specs by:
- Looking in
.nlpm-test/directory - Matching spec filename to artifact filename:
my-agent.spec.md→agents/my-agent.md(uses theartifact:frontmatter field) - If
artifactpath doesn't exist → spec is RED by default (artifact not yet created — this is the TDD "write test first" state)
Worked Example: TDD Cycle
RED — write the spec first. Create
.nlpm-test/my-agent.spec.mdwithartifact: agents/my-agent.mdand atriggers_on:block listing 5 user queries the agent should match. The artifact does not exist yet —/nlpm:testreports RED with one failure:artifact not found.GREEN — write the artifact. Create
agents/my-agent.mdwith frontmatter (name, description, model, tools) and a body. The description must be specific enough that the listed trigger queries land on it. Re-run/nlpm:test: the agent now exists, the tester predicts triggers, and the spec passes.REFACTOR — change the body, re-run the spec. Edit the artifact's behavior. The same spec runs unchanged; if a refactor breaks a trigger query or violates a
handles_inputcase, the test goes RED. Fix forward, re-run.
This is the natural-language analogue of pytest or jest — specs are the contract; artifacts are the implementation.
Scope Note
This skill covers the spec format and runner contract for NL-TDD. For the
scoring rubric the tester compares against, see nlpm:scoring. For the
schemas of artifact frontmatter the spec checks, see nlpm:conventions.