Executing Red Team Engagement Planning
Overview
Red team engagement planning is the foundational phase that defines scope, objectives, rules of engagement (ROE), threat model selection, and operational timelines before any offensive testing begins. A well-structured engagement plan ensures the red team simulates realistic adversary behavior while maintaining safety guardrails that prevent unintended business disruption.
When to Use
- When conducting security assessments that involve executing red team engagement planning
- When following incident response procedures for related security events
- When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
- When validating security controls through hands-on testing
Prerequisites
- Familiarity with red teaming concepts and tools
- Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution
- Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed
- Appropriate authorization for any testing activities
Objectives
- Define clear engagement scope including in-scope and out-of-scope assets, networks, and personnel
- Establish Rules of Engagement (ROE) with emergency stop procedures, communication channels, and legal boundaries
- Select appropriate threat profiles from the MITRE ATT&CK framework aligned to the organization's threat landscape
- Create a detailed attack plan mapping adversary TTPs to engagement objectives
- Develop deconfliction procedures with the organization's SOC/blue team
- Produce a comprehensive engagement brief for stakeholder approval
Legal Notice: This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Unauthorized use against systems you do not own or have written permission to test is illegal and may violate computer fraud laws.
Core Concepts
Engagement Types
| Type |
Description |
Scope |
| Full Scope |
Complete adversary simulation with physical, social, and cyber vectors |
Entire organization |
| Assumed Breach |
Starts from initial foothold, focuses on post-exploitation |
Internal network |
| Objective-Based |
Target specific crown jewels (e.g., domain admin, PII exfiltration) |
Defined targets |
| Purple Team |
Collaborative with blue team for detection improvement |
Specific controls |
Rules of Engagement Components
- Scope Definition: IP ranges, domains, physical locations, personnel
- Restrictions: Systems/networks that must not be touched (e.g., production databases, medical devices)
- Communication Plan: Primary and secondary contact channels, escalation procedures
- Emergency Procedures: Code word for immediate cessation, incident response coordination
- Legal Authorization: Signed authorization letters, get-out-of-jail letters for physical tests
- Data Handling: How sensitive data discovered during testing will be handled and destroyed
- Timeline: Start/end dates, blackout windows, reporting deadlines
Threat Profile Selection
Map organizational threats using MITRE ATT&CK Navigator to select relevant adversary profiles:
- APT29 (Cozy Bear): Government/defense sector targeting via spearphishing, supply chain
- APT28 (Fancy Bear): Government organizations, credential harvesting, zero-days
- FIN7: Financial sector, POS malware, social engineering
- Lazarus Group: Financial institutions, cryptocurrency exchanges, destructive malware
- Conti/Royal: Ransomware operators, double extortion, RaaS model
Workflow
Phase 1: Pre-Engagement
- Conduct initial scoping meeting with stakeholders
- Identify crown jewels and critical business assets
- Review previous security assessments and audit findings
- Define success criteria and engagement objectives
- Draft Rules of Engagement document
Phase 2: Threat Modeling
- Identify relevant threat actors using MITRE ATT&CK
- Map threat actor TTPs to organizational attack surface
- Select primary and secondary attack scenarios
- Define adversary emulation plan with specific technique IDs
- Establish detection checkpoints for purple team opportunities
Phase 3: Operational Planning
- Set up secure communication channels (encrypted email, Signal, etc.)
- Create operational security (OPSEC) guidelines for the red team
- Establish infrastructure requirements (C2 servers, redirectors, phishing domains)
- Develop phased attack timeline with go/no-go decision points
- Create deconfliction matrix with SOC/IR team
Phase 4: Documentation and Approval
- Compile engagement plan document
- Review with legal counsel
- Obtain executive sponsor signature
- Brief red team operators on ROE and restrictions
- Distribute emergency contact cards
Tools and Resources
- MITRE ATT&CK Navigator: Threat actor TTP mapping and visualization
- VECTR: Red team engagement tracking and metrics platform
- Cobalt Strike / Nighthawk: C2 framework planning and infrastructure design
- PlexTrac: Red team reporting and engagement management platform
- SCYTHE: Adversary emulation platform for attack plan creation
Validation Criteria
Common Pitfalls
- Scope Creep: Expanding testing beyond approved boundaries during execution
- Inadequate Deconfliction: SOC investigating red team activity as real incidents
- Missing Legal Authorization: Testing without proper signed authorization
- Unrealistic Threat Models: Simulating threats irrelevant to the organization
- Poor Communication: Failing to maintain contact with stakeholders during engagement
Related Skills
- performing-open-source-intelligence-gathering
- conducting-adversary-simulation-with-atomic-red-team
- performing-assumed-breach-red-team-exercise
- building-red-team-infrastructure-with-redirectors
1---2name: executing-red-team-engagement-planning3description: Red team engagement planning is the foundational phase that defines scope, objectives, rules of engagement (ROE), threat model selection, and operational timelines before any offensive testing begins.4license: Apache-2.05---6# Executing Red Team Engagement Planning
7
8## Overview
9
10Red team engagement planning is the foundational phase that defines scope, objectives, rules of engagement (ROE), threat model selection, and operational timelines before any offensive testing begins. A well-structured engagement plan ensures the red team simulates realistic adversary behavior while maintaining safety guardrails that prevent unintended business disruption.
11
12
13## When to Use
14
15- When conducting security assessments that involve executing red team engagement planning
16- When following incident response procedures for related security events
17- When performing scheduled security testing or auditing activities
18- When validating security controls through hands-on testing
19
20## Prerequisites
21
22- Familiarity with red teaming concepts and tools
23- Access to a test or lab environment for safe execution
24- Python 3.8+ with required dependencies installed
25- Appropriate authorization for any testing activities
26
27## Objectives
28
29- Define clear engagement scope including in-scope and out-of-scope assets, networks, and personnel
30- Establish Rules of Engagement (ROE) with emergency stop procedures, communication channels, and legal boundaries
31- Select appropriate threat profiles from the MITRE ATT&CK framework aligned to the organization's threat landscape
32- Create a detailed attack plan mapping adversary TTPs to engagement objectives
33- Develop deconfliction procedures with the organization's SOC/blue team
34- Produce a comprehensive engagement brief for stakeholder approval
35
36> **Legal Notice:** This skill is for authorized security testing and educational purposes only. Unauthorized use against systems you do not own or have written permission to test is illegal and may violate computer fraud laws.
37
38## Core Concepts
39
40### Engagement Types
41
42| Type | Description | Scope |
43|------|-------------|-------|
44| Full Scope | Complete adversary simulation with physical, social, and cyber vectors | Entire organization |
45| Assumed Breach | Starts from initial foothold, focuses on post-exploitation | Internal network |
46| Objective-Based | Target specific crown jewels (e.g., domain admin, PII exfiltration) | Defined targets |
47| Purple Team | Collaborative with blue team for detection improvement | Specific controls |
48
49### Rules of Engagement Components
50
511. **Scope Definition**: IP ranges, domains, physical locations, personnel
522. **Restrictions**: Systems/networks that must not be touched (e.g., production databases, medical devices)
533. **Communication Plan**: Primary and secondary contact channels, escalation procedures
544. **Emergency Procedures**: Code word for immediate cessation, incident response coordination
555. **Legal Authorization**: Signed authorization letters, get-out-of-jail letters for physical tests
566. **Data Handling**: How sensitive data discovered during testing will be handled and destroyed
577. **Timeline**: Start/end dates, blackout windows, reporting deadlines
58
59### Threat Profile Selection
60
61Map organizational threats using MITRE ATT&CK Navigator to select relevant adversary profiles:
62
63- **APT29 (Cozy Bear)**: Government/defense sector targeting via spearphishing, supply chain
64- **APT28 (Fancy Bear)**: Government organizations, credential harvesting, zero-days
65- **FIN7**: Financial sector, POS malware, social engineering
66- **Lazarus Group**: Financial institutions, cryptocurrency exchanges, destructive malware
67- **Conti/Royal**: Ransomware operators, double extortion, RaaS model
68
69## Workflow
70
71### Phase 1: Pre-Engagement
72
731. Conduct initial scoping meeting with stakeholders
742. Identify crown jewels and critical business assets
753. Review previous security assessments and audit findings
764. Define success criteria and engagement objectives
775. Draft Rules of Engagement document
78
79### Phase 2: Threat Modeling
80
811. Identify relevant threat actors using MITRE ATT&CK
822. Map threat actor TTPs to organizational attack surface
833. Select primary and secondary attack scenarios
844. Define adversary emulation plan with specific technique IDs
855. Establish detection checkpoints for purple team opportunities
86
87### Phase 3: Operational Planning
88
891. Set up secure communication channels (encrypted email, Signal, etc.)
902. Create operational security (OPSEC) guidelines for the red team
913. Establish infrastructure requirements (C2 servers, redirectors, phishing domains)
924. Develop phased attack timeline with go/no-go decision points
935. Create deconfliction matrix with SOC/IR team
94
95### Phase 4: Documentation and Approval
96
971. Compile engagement plan document
982. Review with legal counsel
993. Obtain executive sponsor signature
1004. Brief red team operators on ROE and restrictions
1015. Distribute emergency contact cards
102
103## Tools and Resources
104
105- **MITRE ATT&CK Navigator**: Threat actor TTP mapping and visualization
106- **VECTR**: Red team engagement tracking and metrics platform
107- **Cobalt Strike / Nighthawk**: C2 framework planning and infrastructure design
108- **PlexTrac**: Red team reporting and engagement management platform
109- **SCYTHE**: Adversary emulation platform for attack plan creation
110
111## Validation Criteria
112
113- [ ] Signed Rules of Engagement document
114- [ ] Defined scope with explicit in/out boundaries
115- [ ] Selected threat profile with mapped MITRE ATT&CK techniques
116- [ ] Emergency stop procedures tested and verified
117- [ ] Communication plan distributed to all stakeholders
118- [ ] Legal authorization obtained and filed
119- [ ] Red team operators briefed and acknowledged ROE
120
121## Common Pitfalls
122
1231. **Scope Creep**: Expanding testing beyond approved boundaries during execution
1242. **Inadequate Deconfliction**: SOC investigating red team activity as real incidents
1253. **Missing Legal Authorization**: Testing without proper signed authorization
1264. **Unrealistic Threat Models**: Simulating threats irrelevant to the organization
1275. **Poor Communication**: Failing to maintain contact with stakeholders during engagement
128
129## Related Skills
130
131- performing-open-source-intelligence-gathering
132- conducting-adversary-simulation-with-atomic-red-team
133- performing-assumed-breach-red-team-exercise
134- building-red-team-infrastructure-with-redirectors