Claude Review

claude-review — Claude 无界面评审

用一次 claude --print 获得 Claude 的独立评审，不开启完整交互会话。

When To Invoke

Usage

~/.codex/skills/claude-review/scripts/claude-review <type> <file_or_dir> [--deep]

Examples:

# Review plan before implementation (auto-chains plan-eng-review)
~/.codex/skills/claude-review/scripts/claude-review plan ./docs/plan.md

# Architecture review with deep consultation (also chains office-hours)
~/.codex/skills/claude-review/scripts/claude-review architecture ./docs/design.md --deep

# Quality-check docs before shipping (single pass, no chain)
~/.codex/skills/claude-review/scripts/claude-review docs ./README.md

# Audit a work directory for buried failures
~/.codex/skills/claude-review/scripts/claude-review work-log ./.codexfree/

What Happens

1. Script validates inputs and resolves absolute path
2. Assembles a headless-mode prompt (no AskUserQuestion, single final report)
3. Calls claude --print --permission-mode bypassPermissions once
4. For plan / architecture: Claude auto-invokes its plan-eng-review skill in the same session and consolidates
5. For --deep (plan / architecture only): Claude additionally chains the office-hours skill
6. Report streamed to stdout AND saved to .claude-review/<timestamp>-<type>.md in the current working directory

All skill chaining happens inside ONE Claude session — you pay for one --print invocation regardless of how many sub-skills are chained.

Output Format

The report is always Markdown with this structure:

# Review Report — <type>
**Target:** <absolute path>
**Timestamp:** <UTC ISO>

## Executive Summary
...

## Critical Issues (must fix before proceeding)
...

## High-Priority Findings (should fix soon)
...

## Suggestions (nice to have)
...

## Chained: plan-eng-review  (only for plan/architecture)
...

## Chained: office-hours  (only with --deep)
...

## Decision
approve | revise | block
<1-2 sentence rationale>

Codex should read the report, treat revise findings as required fixes, then re-invoke the skill on the updated artifact. block means the artifact has fundamental problems and needs a rewrite, not a patch.

Decision Taxonomy

Why Headless?

Calling Claude interactively burns tokens on greetings, clarification, and tool overhead. --print mode:

• Single request → single response → exit
• All tool use happens inside one session
• No context carried across invocations
• Much lower token cost than a conversation

The tradeoff: Claude cannot ask follow-up questions. The script's prompt assumes sensible defaults and instructs Claude to produce a complete report in one pass.

Skill Chain Reference

docs and work-log don't chain because plan-eng-review is an architecture-review skill, not a copy-editing or audit skill.

Prerequisites

• claude CLI installed (npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code)
• User is logged into Claude Code (claude --version works)
• For plan / architecture: the plan-eng-review skill must be installed in the user's Claude skill directory (part of the gstack plugin)
• For --deep: the office-hours skill must be installed

Files

• scripts/claude-review — main bash wrapper
• references/review-prompts.md — lens definitions for each review type (Claude reads these via the bash-assembled prompt)