Logo Design Board
Overview
Use this skill to turn a brand brief into original logo directions through a compact designer board: public-source designer lenses, brand strategy, concept generation, critique, scoring, and production handoff.
Treat designer distillation as a method for extracting decision criteria, not as impersonation. Never copy a designer's work, a client logo, or a protected mark.
When to Use
Use this skill when the user wants to:
- Design a logo, brand mark, wordmark, monogram, app icon, favicon, or visual identity direction.
- Turn project background, product positioning, or founder notes into logo concepts.
- Use distilled design thinking from public designers or studios to guide logo decisions.
- Compare logo directions, critique a generated mark, or improve a rough symbol.
- Produce image-generation prompts, vector construction notes, and brand-guide starter notes for a logo concept.
Do not use
Do not use this skill as the primary workflow for:
- Legal trademark clearance, infringement opinions, or final IP approval.
- Copying an existing logo, designer style, brand system, mascot, or protected character.
- General poster, illustration, landing-page, UI, or marketing image work where logo identity is not the core task.
- Producing final production files without human review, vector cleanup, optical correction, and legal checks.
Instructions
For full logo work, read both references before producing final recommendations:
references/designer-lens-framework.md: use when choosing or distilling designer lenses.
references/logo-quality-rubric.md: use before scoring concepts or selecting finalists.
For small critique requests, use the workflow below directly and load the rubric reference only if a scored recommendation is needed.
Workflow
Establish the brand brief:
- Brand or product name.
- Category and target audience.
- Core promise in one sentence.
- Brand personality with tensions, such as precise but warm, premium but approachable, playful but credible.
- Competitors and category visual codes.
- Required uses: app icon, favicon, website header, social avatar, packaging, merch, print, signage, or motion.
- Constraints: words that must appear, initials, symbols to avoid, color restrictions, cultural or accessibility constraints.
Fill gaps conservatively:
- Ask at most three targeted questions when missing details would change the design direction.
- If the user wants speed, proceed with explicit assumptions and mark them as assumptions.
- Do not ask for a questionnaire when the brief is already enough to start.
Set the designer board:
- Default board:
- Paul Rand lens: idea-led simplicity, memorable symbols, wit without clutter.
- Massimo Vignelli lens: discipline, grid, reduction, timeless systems, typographic restraint.
- Paula Scher lens: expressive typography, cultural energy, scale, attitude, category presence.
- Add one optional lens only when useful:
- Saul Bass for narrative symbols, motion-friendly silhouettes, and cinematic reduction.
- Michael Bierut for client context, implementation systems, and real-world usage ecology.
- Label these as public-method lenses. Do not claim to speak for the real person.
Distill or adapt the lenses:
- Use user-provided sources first: books, interviews, portfolios, talks, case studies, notes, or screenshots.
- If the user names a specific living or current designer and accuracy matters, gather current public sources before distilling.
- Extract principles, recurring judgments, red flags, and design questions. Avoid extracting only surface style.
- Reject any lens that only produces a visual costume rather than design decisions.
Define the logo strategy:
- State the logo's job: what it must signal, where it must work, and what it must avoid.
- Identify the category code to borrow and the category code to break.
- Convert vague adjectives into designable tensions.
- Decide whether the strongest route is a wordmark, monogram, pictorial symbol, abstract mark, mascot-like icon, or flexible identity system.
Generate concept territories:
- Produce three to five directions, not one generic logo.
- For each direction include:
- Name of the territory.
- Strategic thesis.
- Mark type.
- Visual construction in plain language.
- Typography direction.
- Color direction and one-color behavior.
- Which designer lenses support it and which challenge it.
- Image-generation prompt for rough exploration.
- Vector construction notes for redrawing.
- Main risks and how to test them.
- Prompts must request original marks, flat/vector-friendly forms, simple geometry, clean edges, and no imitation of existing logos.
Critique like a board:
- Create a table with each lens as a row and each concept as a column.
- Separate praise, risk, and required revision.
- Remove concepts that fail small-size recognition, one-color use, or category distinction.
- Use the rubric reference to score finalists when the user needs a recommendation.
Prepare handoff:
- Recommend one or two finalists and explain the tradeoff.
- Provide final prompt language for image exploration.
- Provide vector redrawing notes, including grid, stroke, negative space, and optical correction concerns.
- Provide usage tests: 16 px favicon, 32 px app icon, 120 px social avatar, website header, black on white, white on black, grayscale, print, embroidery or stamp when relevant.
- State that raster output is concept art; final delivery requires vector cleanup and trademark search.
Output Format
Use this structure for a full logo request:
## Brand Read
[brief synthesis and assumptions]
## Designer Board
[selected lenses and why]
## Strategy
[logo job, category code, design tension]
## Concept Territories
[3-5 directions with prompts and vector notes]
## Board Critique
[lens-by-concept critique table]
## Recommendation
[top 1-2 directions, scoring summary, next iteration]
## Handoff
[prompt, vector notes, usage tests, legal/IP caveat]
1---2name: logo-design-board3description: Use when creating, critiquing, or iterating logo and brand-mark concepts through a designer-distillation board, including brand intake, public-source designer lenses, concept territories, visual prompts, and logo quality scoring.4---5
6# Logo Design Board
7
8## Overview
9
10Use this skill to turn a brand brief into original logo directions through a compact designer board: public-source designer lenses, brand strategy, concept generation, critique, scoring, and production handoff.
11
12Treat designer distillation as a method for extracting decision criteria, not as impersonation. Never copy a designer's work, a client logo, or a protected mark.
13
14## When to Use
15
16Use this skill when the user wants to:
17
18- Design a logo, brand mark, wordmark, monogram, app icon, favicon, or visual identity direction.
19- Turn project background, product positioning, or founder notes into logo concepts.
20- Use distilled design thinking from public designers or studios to guide logo decisions.
21- Compare logo directions, critique a generated mark, or improve a rough symbol.
22- Produce image-generation prompts, vector construction notes, and brand-guide starter notes for a logo concept.
23
24## Do not use
25
26Do not use this skill as the primary workflow for:
27
28- Legal trademark clearance, infringement opinions, or final IP approval.
29- Copying an existing logo, designer style, brand system, mascot, or protected character.
30- General poster, illustration, landing-page, UI, or marketing image work where logo identity is not the core task.
31- Producing final production files without human review, vector cleanup, optical correction, and legal checks.
32
33## Instructions
34
35For full logo work, read both references before producing final recommendations:
36
37- `references/designer-lens-framework.md`: use when choosing or distilling designer lenses.
38- `references/logo-quality-rubric.md`: use before scoring concepts or selecting finalists.
39
40For small critique requests, use the workflow below directly and load the rubric reference only if a scored recommendation is needed.
41
42## Workflow
43
441. Establish the brand brief:
45 - Brand or product name.
46 - Category and target audience.
47 - Core promise in one sentence.
48 - Brand personality with tensions, such as precise but warm, premium but approachable, playful but credible.
49 - Competitors and category visual codes.
50 - Required uses: app icon, favicon, website header, social avatar, packaging, merch, print, signage, or motion.
51 - Constraints: words that must appear, initials, symbols to avoid, color restrictions, cultural or accessibility constraints.
52
532. Fill gaps conservatively:
54 - Ask at most three targeted questions when missing details would change the design direction.
55 - If the user wants speed, proceed with explicit assumptions and mark them as assumptions.
56 - Do not ask for a questionnaire when the brief is already enough to start.
57
583. Set the designer board:
59 - Default board:
60 - Paul Rand lens: idea-led simplicity, memorable symbols, wit without clutter.
61 - Massimo Vignelli lens: discipline, grid, reduction, timeless systems, typographic restraint.
62 - Paula Scher lens: expressive typography, cultural energy, scale, attitude, category presence.
63 - Add one optional lens only when useful:
64 - Saul Bass for narrative symbols, motion-friendly silhouettes, and cinematic reduction.
65 - Michael Bierut for client context, implementation systems, and real-world usage ecology.
66 - Label these as public-method lenses. Do not claim to speak for the real person.
67
684. Distill or adapt the lenses:
69 - Use user-provided sources first: books, interviews, portfolios, talks, case studies, notes, or screenshots.
70 - If the user names a specific living or current designer and accuracy matters, gather current public sources before distilling.
71 - Extract principles, recurring judgments, red flags, and design questions. Avoid extracting only surface style.
72 - Reject any lens that only produces a visual costume rather than design decisions.
73
745. Define the logo strategy:
75 - State the logo's job: what it must signal, where it must work, and what it must avoid.
76 - Identify the category code to borrow and the category code to break.
77 - Convert vague adjectives into designable tensions.
78 - Decide whether the strongest route is a wordmark, monogram, pictorial symbol, abstract mark, mascot-like icon, or flexible identity system.
79
806. Generate concept territories:
81 - Produce three to five directions, not one generic logo.
82 - For each direction include:
83 - Name of the territory.
84 - Strategic thesis.
85 - Mark type.
86 - Visual construction in plain language.
87 - Typography direction.
88 - Color direction and one-color behavior.
89 - Which designer lenses support it and which challenge it.
90 - Image-generation prompt for rough exploration.
91 - Vector construction notes for redrawing.
92 - Main risks and how to test them.
93 - Prompts must request original marks, flat/vector-friendly forms, simple geometry, clean edges, and no imitation of existing logos.
94
957. Critique like a board:
96 - Create a table with each lens as a row and each concept as a column.
97 - Separate praise, risk, and required revision.
98 - Remove concepts that fail small-size recognition, one-color use, or category distinction.
99 - Use the rubric reference to score finalists when the user needs a recommendation.
100
1018. Prepare handoff:
102 - Recommend one or two finalists and explain the tradeoff.
103 - Provide final prompt language for image exploration.
104 - Provide vector redrawing notes, including grid, stroke, negative space, and optical correction concerns.
105 - Provide usage tests: 16 px favicon, 32 px app icon, 120 px social avatar, website header, black on white, white on black, grayscale, print, embroidery or stamp when relevant.
106 - State that raster output is concept art; final delivery requires vector cleanup and trademark search.
107
108## Output Format
109
110Use this structure for a full logo request:
111
112```markdown
113## Brand Read
114[brief synthesis and assumptions]
115
116## Designer Board
117[selected lenses and why]
118
119## Strategy
120[logo job, category code, design tension]
121
122## Concept Territories
123[3-5 directions with prompts and vector notes]
124
125## Board Critique
126[lens-by-concept critique table]
127
128## Recommendation
129[top 1-2 directions, scoring summary, next iteration]
130
131## Handoff
132[prompt, vector notes, usage tests, legal/IP caveat]
133```