Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs
Help turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue.
Start by understanding the current project context, then ask questions one at a time to refine the idea. Once you understand what you're building, present the design and get user approval.
Anti-Pattern: "This Is Too Simple To Need A Design"
Every project goes through this process. A todo list, a single-function utility, a config change — all of them. "Simple" projects are where unexamined assumptions cause the most wasted work. The design can be short (a few sentences for truly simple projects), but you MUST present it and get approval.
Checklist
You MUST create a task for each of these items and complete them in order:
- Explore project context — check files, docs, recent commits
- Ask clarifying questions — one at a time, understand purpose/constraints/success criteria
- Propose 2-3 approaches — with trade-offs and your recommendation
- Present design — in sections scaled to their complexity, get user approval after each section
- Write design doc — save to
docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md and commit
- Spec self-review — quick inline check for placeholders, contradictions, ambiguity, scope
- User reviews written spec — ask user to review the spec file before proceeding
- Transition to implementation — invoke writing-plans skill to create implementation plan
Process Flow
graph TD
Explore["Explore project context"]
Ask["Ask clarifying questions"]
Propose["Propose 2-3 approaches"]
Present["Present design sections"]
ApproveDesign{"User approves design?"}
WriteDoc["Write design doc"]
SpecReview["Spec self-review<br/>(fix inline)"]
ReviewSpec{"User reviews spec?"}
InvokePlans((("Invoke writing-plans skill")))
Explore --> Ask
Ask --> Propose
Propose --> Present
Present --> ApproveDesign
ApproveDesign -->|"no, revise"| Present
ApproveDesign -->|"yes"| WriteDoc
WriteDoc --> SpecReview
SpecReview --> ReviewSpec
ReviewSpec -->|"changes requested"| WriteDoc
ReviewSpec -->|"approved"| InvokePlans
The terminal state is invoking writing-plans. Do NOT invoke any other implementation skill directly. The ONLY skill you invoke after brainstorming is writing-plans.
The Process
Understanding the idea:
- Check out the current project state first (files, docs, recent commits)
- Before asking detailed questions, assess scope: if the request describes multiple independent subsystems, flag this immediately
- If the project is too large for a single spec, help the user decompose into sub-projects
- For appropriately-scoped projects, ask questions one at a time to refine the idea
- Only one question per message — if a topic needs more exploration, break it into multiple questions
- Focus on understanding: purpose, constraints, success criteria
Exploring approaches:
- Propose 2-3 different approaches with trade-offs
- Lead with your recommended option and explain why
Presenting the design:
- Once you understand what you're building, present the design
- Scale each section to its complexity: a few sentences if straightforward, up to 200-300 words if nuanced
- Ask after each section whether it looks right so far
- Cover: architecture, components, data flow, error handling, testing
Design for isolation and clarity:
- Break the system into smaller units that each have one clear purpose
- For each unit: what does it do, how do you use it, what does it depend on?
- Smaller, well-bounded units are easier to test and change
After the Design
Documentation:
- Write the validated design to
docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md
- Commit the design document to git
Spec Self-Review:
After writing the spec document, look at it with fresh eyes:
- Placeholder scan: Any "TBD", "TODO", incomplete sections? Fix them.
- Internal consistency: Do any sections contradict each other?
- Scope check: Is this focused enough for a single implementation plan?
- Ambiguity check: Could any requirement be interpreted two different ways?
User Review Gate:
After the spec review passes, ask the user to review the written spec before proceeding:
"Spec written and committed to <path>. Please review it and let me know if you want to make any changes before we start writing out the implementation plan."
Wait for the user's response. Only proceed once the user approves.
Implementation:
- Invoke the writing-plans skill to create a detailed implementation plan
Key Principles
- One question at a time - Don't overwhelm with multiple questions
- Multiple choice preferred - Easier to answer than open-ended when possible
- YAGNI ruthlessly - Remove unnecessary features from all designs
- Explore alternatives - Always propose 2-3 approaches before settling
- Incremental validation - Present design, get approval before moving on
1---2name: brainstorming3description: Use when starting any creative work — creating features, building components, adding functionality, or modifying behavior — before any implementation begins.4---56# Brainstorming Ideas Into Designs78Help turn ideas into fully formed designs and specs through natural collaborative dialogue.910Start by understanding the current project context, then ask questions one at a time to refine the idea. Once you understand what you're building, present the design and get user approval.1112<HARD-GATE>13Do NOT invoke any implementation skill, write any code, scaffold any project, or take any implementation action until you have presented a design and the user has approved it. This applies to EVERY project regardless of perceived simplicity.14</HARD-GATE>1516## Anti-Pattern: "This Is Too Simple To Need A Design"1718Every project goes through this process. A todo list, a single-function utility, a config change — all of them. "Simple" projects are where unexamined assumptions cause the most wasted work. The design can be short (a few sentences for truly simple projects), but you MUST present it and get approval.1920## Checklist2122You MUST create a task for each of these items and complete them in order:23241. **Explore project context** — check files, docs, recent commits252. **Ask clarifying questions** — one at a time, understand purpose/constraints/success criteria263. **Propose 2-3 approaches** — with trade-offs and your recommendation274. **Present design** — in sections scaled to their complexity, get user approval after each section285. **Write design doc** — save to `docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md` and commit296. **Spec self-review** — quick inline check for placeholders, contradictions, ambiguity, scope307. **User reviews written spec** — ask user to review the spec file before proceeding318. **Transition to implementation** — invoke writing-plans skill to create implementation plan3233## Process Flow3435```mermaid36graph TD37 Explore["Explore project context"]38 Ask["Ask clarifying questions"]39 Propose["Propose 2-3 approaches"]40 Present["Present design sections"]41 ApproveDesign{"User approves design?"}42 WriteDoc["Write design doc"]43 SpecReview["Spec self-review<br/>(fix inline)"]44 ReviewSpec{"User reviews spec?"}45 InvokePlans((("Invoke writing-plans skill")))4647 Explore --> Ask48 Ask --> Propose49 Propose --> Present50 Present --> ApproveDesign51 ApproveDesign -->|"no, revise"| Present52 ApproveDesign -->|"yes"| WriteDoc53 WriteDoc --> SpecReview54 SpecReview --> ReviewSpec55 ReviewSpec -->|"changes requested"| WriteDoc56 ReviewSpec -->|"approved"| InvokePlans57```5859**The terminal state is invoking writing-plans.** Do NOT invoke any other implementation skill directly. The ONLY skill you invoke after brainstorming is writing-plans.6061## The Process6263**Understanding the idea:**6465- Check out the current project state first (files, docs, recent commits)66- Before asking detailed questions, assess scope: if the request describes multiple independent subsystems, flag this immediately67- If the project is too large for a single spec, help the user decompose into sub-projects68- For appropriately-scoped projects, ask questions one at a time to refine the idea69- Only one question per message — if a topic needs more exploration, break it into multiple questions70- Focus on understanding: purpose, constraints, success criteria7172**Exploring approaches:**7374- Propose 2-3 different approaches with trade-offs75- Lead with your recommended option and explain why7677**Presenting the design:**7879- Once you understand what you're building, present the design80- Scale each section to its complexity: a few sentences if straightforward, up to 200-300 words if nuanced81- Ask after each section whether it looks right so far82- Cover: architecture, components, data flow, error handling, testing8384**Design for isolation and clarity:**8586- Break the system into smaller units that each have one clear purpose87- For each unit: what does it do, how do you use it, what does it depend on?88- Smaller, well-bounded units are easier to test and change8990## After the Design9192**Documentation:**9394- Write the validated design to `docs/specs/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-design.md`95- Commit the design document to git9697**Spec Self-Review:**98After writing the spec document, look at it with fresh eyes:991001. **Placeholder scan:** Any "TBD", "TODO", incomplete sections? Fix them.1012. **Internal consistency:** Do any sections contradict each other?1023. **Scope check:** Is this focused enough for a single implementation plan?1034. **Ambiguity check:** Could any requirement be interpreted two different ways?104105**User Review Gate:**106After the spec review passes, ask the user to review the written spec before proceeding:107108> "Spec written and committed to `<path>`. Please review it and let me know if you want to make any changes before we start writing out the implementation plan."109110Wait for the user's response. Only proceed once the user approves.111112**Implementation:**113114- Invoke the writing-plans skill to create a detailed implementation plan115116## Key Principles117118- **One question at a time** - Don't overwhelm with multiple questions119- **Multiple choice preferred** - Easier to answer than open-ended when possible120- **YAGNI ruthlessly** - Remove unnecessary features from all designs121- **Explore alternatives** - Always propose 2-3 approaches before settling122- **Incremental validation** - Present design, get approval before moving on
yeaight7