Public Equity Research
Own deep research on a named public company and its exact listed security. Use the user's language and distinguish business quality, security valuation/readiness and portfolio action.
Read references/equity-research-protocol.md. If the installed $public-equity-investing plugin is available, use its narrow earnings, valuation, scenario or thesis workflows to deepen this protocol; if unavailable, complete the same evidence categories directly from current primary filings and authoritative sources.
Workflow
- Resolve identity and cutoff. Confirm legal issuer, ticker, exchange, security/share class, currency, ADR/depositary ratio, fiscal calendar and data cutoff. Separate company value from the exact security claim.
- Build the source ledger. Start with current annual/interim filings, earnings release, notes, investor presentation only as management claims, exchange/regulator disclosures and official share/capital records. Apply
$finance-evidence-guardto decisive figures. - Understand the business. Map segments, customers, geography, revenue drivers, unit economics, pricing, cyclicality, competitive position, capital intensity, regulation and key dependencies.
- Normalize financials. Reconcile accounting basis, currency, consolidation, inflation treatment, fiscal periods, acquisitions/disposals, one-offs, stock compensation, leases, capitalized costs and continuing operations. Build revenue, margin, cash conversion, returns on capital, leverage and dilution trends.
- Test earnings quality and balance sheet. Compare profit with operating/free cash flow, working capital, capex, receivables/inventory, provisions, related parties, refinancing, covenants, pension/off-balance-sheet obligations and contingent liabilities.
- Estimate what is priced in. Use at least two compatible valuation frames—such as historical/peer multiples, reverse DCF, unit economics or asset value. Make assumptions visible, use scenario ranges and show the breakpoints that explain the current price.
- Define thesis and variant. State what consensus/price appears to assume, why the evidence differs, dated catalysts/recognition path, KPIs, strongest contradiction and hard kill criteria. Route persistent monitoring to
$investment-thesis-tracker. - Add market context. Use
$technical-quant-analysisfor timing,$market-regime-analysisfor cross-asset context, and$probabilistic-market-forecastfor outcome ranges. Use$turkey-markets-analysisfor BIST/KAP/TMS 29/Türkiye rules. - Challenge and decide. Compare a relevant peer/alternative and doing nothing, then run
$investment-red-team. Use$portfolio-risk-and-sizingfor allocation and$pre-trade-investment-gateif action is imminent.
Hard rules
- An open-ended “best stock” claim must start with
$equity-opportunity-funnel; a named-company report cannot establish a market-wide winner. - Do not treat management guidance, analyst targets or investor presentations as independent proof.
- Do not mix periods, currencies, consolidated bases, reported/adjusted metrics or nominal/real figures silently.
- Do not hide dilution, leverage, cyclicality, governance, liquidity or valuation sensitivity behind a narrative moat.
- Do not convert a precise spreadsheet output into precise confidence; ranges must reflect model and evidence uncertainty.
Output
Lead with action or research verdict, horizon, current price/time and confidence. Then show identity, business/segments, normalized financial trends, earnings quality/balance sheet, valuation and what is priced in, bear/base/bull cases, catalysts, contradictions/kill criteria, peer/alternative, technical/regime context when material, portfolio/execution conditions and source ledger.