Comparative Feasibility Ranking
Purpose: Produce a defensible ranking of candidates by feasibility. Uses multi-dimensional radar charts to visualize relative strengths and a weighted feasibility index to collapse multiple dimensions into a single comparable score.
When to use:
- Multiple candidates have been assessed and need to be compared
- Stakeholders need a clear ranking to prioritize resource allocation
- You need to identify which candidates are most implementable given current constraints
Budget
| Metric |
Target |
| Candidates compared |
>= 2 |
| Dimensions in radar |
>= 5 |
| Weight justifications |
1 per dimension |
State Ledger
| Key |
Type |
Description |
| candidates[] |
array |
All candidates being compared |
| dimension_weights{} |
map |
Dimension -> weight mapping |
| radar_data[] |
array |
Per-candidate radar scores |
| feasibility_index[] |
array |
Weighted composite scores |
| ranking[] |
array |
Final ranked list |
Available Tactics
| Tactic |
When |
| multi-dimensional-readiness-scan |
To generate per-candidate radar data for comparison |
| staged-gate-evaluation |
To compare gate-passage likelihood across candidates |
Available SOPs
| SOP |
Purpose |
| radar-synthesis |
Produce radar data for each candidate |
| feasibility-synthesis |
Produce final comparative matrix |
Execution Guidance
- Ensure all candidates have been assessed on the same dimensions
- Normalize scores to a common scale (1-9 recommended)
- Assign dimension weights based on context (stakeholder priorities, strategic fit)
- Calculate weighted feasibility index for each candidate
- Produce comparative radar visualization data
- Rank candidates and identify clear tiers (strong/moderate/weak feasibility)
Output Format
comparative_ranking:
dimensions: [technical, market, regulatory, resource, organizational]
weights: {technical: 0.3, market: 0.25, regulatory: 0.2, resource: 0.15, organizational: 0.1}
candidates:
- {name, scores: {...}, weighted_index: 0.X, rank: N, tier: strong|moderate|weak}
radar_data: [{candidate, dimension_scores: [...]}]
recommendation: <top candidate(s) with rationale>
caveats: [...]
Available Tactics
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic |
When to use |
| multi-dimensional-readiness-scan |
Assess readiness across multiple dimensions, synthesize into radar visualization, and identify bottleneck dimensions. |
| staged-gate-evaluation |
Define gate criteria for each stage, evaluate candidates at each gate, and render go/kill/recycle decisions with evidence. |
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP |
When to use |
| feasibility-synthesis |
Synthesize all assessments into a feasibility matrix, recommendation, and risk summary. |
| radar-synthesis |
Synthesize multiple dimension scores into radar chart data and compute overall readiness. |
yogsoth-ai