Gap Pairwise Judgment

Gap Pairwise Judgment

Make a criterion-by-criterion relative priority judgment between two gaps and output the preference result.

HARD-GATE

Pipeline

1. Precondition check: Verify the completeness of the two GapRecords; confirm the criteria list is non-empty
2. Criterion-by-criterion comparison: For each criterion, independently judge the relative advantage of Gap A versus Gap B; record which is better and why
3. Overall preference determination: Aggregate by weighting each criterion's weight to determine the overall preference direction
4. Saaty scale assignment: Map preference strength to the Saaty scale (1=equal / 3=slightly better / 5=clearly better / 7=strongly better / 9=extremely better); if B is better than A, take the reciprocal
5. Output: Return the PairwiseJudgment object

Output Format

{
  "gap_a_id": "gap_001",
  "gap_b_id": "gap_002",
  "criteria_comparisons": [
    {
      "criterion": "importance",
      "weight": 0.40,
      "preferred": "gap_001",
      "rationale": "..."
    }
  ],
  "preferred_gap": "gap_001",
  "preference_strength": "moderate",
  "saaty_value": 3,
  "overall_rationale": "Overall basis (2-3 sentences)"
}