yogsoth-ai Mitigation Design Strategy
Design countermeasures for high-priority failure modes across three layers: prevention, detection, response.
Method
- mitigation-design-sop generates countermeasures for each H-priority failure:
- Prevention: eliminate or reduce occurrence
- Detection: improve ability to detect before impact
- Response: contingency plan if failure occurs
- re-scoring re-evaluates S/O/D with mitigations in place
- mitigation-validation runs mini-FMEA on mitigations themselves
- Iterate until all H-priority items reach M or L after mitigation
Budget Table
| Parameter | S | M | L |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mitigations per failure mode | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Re-scoring rounds | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Mitigation validation depth | shallow | standard | full FMEA |
Orchestration
[H-priority failures] → mitigation-design-sop
→ re-scoring → action-priority-matrix (re-classify)
→ [still H?] → mitigation-validation → iterate
→ [M or L?] → accept, document residual risk
Subagents
- mitigation-design-sop (countermeasure generation)
- re-scoring (post-mitigation S/O/D)
- action-priority-matrix (re-classification)
Available Tactics
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| Tactic | When to use |
|---|---|
| mitigation-validation | Tactic: Run mini-FMEA on proposed mitigations to verify they do not introduce new failure modes. Prevents mitigation-induced risks. |
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|---|
| action-priority-matrix | Compute Risk Priority Number (RPN = S x O x D), classify failure modes into H/M/L action priority per AIAG-VDA tables. |
| mitigation-design-sop | Design prevention, detection, and response measures for high-priority failure modes. Produces actionable countermeasure specifications. |
| re-scoring | Re-evaluate S/O/D scores after mitigation measures are in place. Validates that mitigations actually reduce risk as expected. |