yogsoth-ai Prioritization Scoring
Multi-dimensional gap scoring and ranking.
Operations
- multi-criteria-scoring — score gaps on multiple dimensions
- stakeholder-confirmation — validate priorities across perspectives
- evidence-grading — assess evidence quality supporting each gap
Available SOPs
Subagent: multi-criteria-scoring, stakeholder-confirmation Shared: evidence-synthesis Import: web-research
Execution Guidance
Define scoring dimensions (importance, feasibility, novelty, urgency, impact). Score each gap 1-10 per dimension. Weight by stakeholder priorities. Rank. Check sensitivity of ranking to weight changes — are top gaps robust to ±20% weight shifts?
Minimum Yield
<HARD-GATE>
- gaps scored: >= 5
- dimensions used: >= 4
- stakeholder perspectives: >= 3
- sensitivity check: performed
</HARD-GATE>
Available SOPs
Optional, no fixed order; the final leaf is always a sop.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|---|
| deep-insight-multi-criteria-scoring | Score gaps on multiple dimensions (importance, feasibility, novelty, urgency, impact) using weighted multi-criteria decision analysis. |
| deep-insight-web-research | Deep web research with full page fetching via Apify. Import of web-browsing/web-research skill. Must fetch full page — no conclusions from previews. |
| evidence-synthesis | Synthesize multi-source evidence into structured argumentation. Weaves findings from literature, web, and analysis into coherent evidence maps with explicit strength ratings. |
| stakeholder-confirmation | Simulate stakeholder perspectives to validate gap priorities. Assesses gap value from researcher, practitioner, funder, and end-user viewpoints. |