Judge a paper's stated research question against the FINER criteria (Feasible, Interesting, Novel, Ethical, Relevant) — five independent judgments with justification, evaluating the question itself, not the paper's results. Use this whenever the user wants to know whether a paper is asking a good research question, distinct from whether it answered that question well.
yogsoth-ai
Updated npx skillmds@latest add yogsoth-ai/research-question-appraisal-2 FINER: five independent judgments on the paper's stated research question (not on its execution or results). Structurally closer to a quality-appraisal checklist than to slot-filling — do not merge with question-framing (graph correction M15: PICO/PECO/SPIDER fill slots, FINER judges).
Subagent — spawned via spawn-agent skill.
| SOP | When to use |
|---|---|
| spawn-agent | Spawn a customized CC subagent with full MCP tool access. |
yogsoth-ai/de-anthropocentric-research-engine/tree/main/paper-reading/skills/research-question-appraisal commit b9a2f2dcea