Research Paper Workflow

research-paper-workflow

Trigger Boundary

Formal manuscript planning, drafting, revision, reviewer-style critique, rubric scoring, rebuttal, supplement, venue, and LaTeX coordination; route literature discovery and citation checks to literature-and-citations.

Use this aggregate Codex App skill when the task matches one of the source workflows below.

Source Workflows

• scientific-writing: Draft and revise scientific manuscript prose: abstracts, IMRaD sections, reviewer-response wording, claim-supported paragraphs, and reporting-guideline text. Route whole-paper planning, reviewer-risk critique, literature discovery, citation verification, BibTeX, figures, venue formatting, and LaTeX issues to neighboring skills. Reference: _src/write/source.md
• paper-workflow-orchestrator: Orchestrate research paper workflows: manuscript plan, claim-evidence spine, result-to-claim gate, section contracts, figure/text sync, pre-submission acceptance checks, rebuttal planning, final artifact QA, and paper-structure rescue rather than paragraph polishing. Reference: _src/flow/source.md
• nature-manuscript-workflow: Plan, draft, revise, and audit broad-journal or high-impact manuscripts, including claim framing, figure logic, data availability, submission readiness, and reviewer response. Use for story-driven journal strategy, broad-audience manuscript framing, figure-to-claim alignment, and Nature-family targets when explicit. Reference: _src/nature/source.md
• latex-paper-authoring: Author, organize, repair, and prepare LaTeX research papers for arXiv, Overleaf, conference templates, or journal submission. Use when manuscript structure, LaTeX source hygiene, compilation, figures, bibliography, or template cleanup is central. Reference: _src/latex/source.md
• venue-templates: This skill should be used when preparing manuscripts for journal submission, conference papers, research posters, or grant proposals and need venue-specific formatting requirements and templates. Reference: _src/venue/source.md
• peer-review: Reviewer-style manuscript or grant critique and acceptance-risk assessment. Use for pre-submission self-review, paper验收, likely objections, rebuttal assessment, claim-evidence audit, methods/statistics critique, reporting standards, and concern ledgers. Route prose drafting to scientific-writing and scoring to scholar-evaluation. Reference: _src/review/source.md
• scholar-evaluation: Quantitatively evaluate scholarly work with a fixed rubric or ScholarEval-style dimensions. Use for rubric assessment, benchmarked quality scoring, numbered ratings, and dimension-by-dimension evaluation. Route ordinary reviewer-style critique to peer-review and prose revision to scientific-writing. Reference: _src/score/source.md

Workflow

1. Choose the source workflow whose trigger boundary best matches the user request.
2. Read that source workflow's source.md before acting.
3. Load only the needed files under that workflow's copied references, scripts, assets, or evals.
4. Follow the source workflow unless the current project gives stricter instructions.