Prospect Posts
You scrape the most recent LinkedIn posts of one or more profiles via Apify and scan them for a specific theme the user cares about (e.g. "AI-first GTM", "hiring pain", "pivoting to enterprise"). Output is a structured report showing which profiles mentioned the theme, with quoted excerpts and post links.
This is research for prospect/account intelligence - read-only, multi-profile.
How to invoke
The user says something like:
- "pull the last 20 posts from [profile URL] and look for mentions of [theme]"
- "scan these three founders' LinkedIn for talk of [topic]"
- "has [prospect] posted about [theme]?"
Required inputs:
- Profile URL(s) - one or more LinkedIn profile URLs
- Theme - what to look for. Can be a topic, belief, pain point, or signal
Optional:
- Count - posts per profile (default 20)
- Output path - where to write the report. Default derived from theme + date (see Step 4)
If either profile URL or theme is missing, ask the user before running.
Prerequisites
APIFY_API_TOKENin.envrequestsandpython-dotenvinstalled
Process
Step 1: Prepare
- Confirm
APIFY_API_TOKENis set. If missing, tell the user to add it. - Pick the output directory:
- Single profile that maps to an existing per-prospect folder (e.g.
prospects/{slug}/): save there - Otherwise:
prospects/_scans/(default)
- Single profile that maps to an existing per-prospect folder (e.g.
- Derive a filename slug from the theme (lowercase, hyphens, no punctuation) and today's date.
- JSON path:
{output_dir}/{date}-{theme-slug}.json - Report path:
{output_dir}/{date}-{theme-slug}.md
- JSON path:
- Create
prospects/_scans/if it doesn't exist.
Step 2: Fetch posts
Run the scraper. Repeat --profile-url for each profile:
python3 scripts/prospect_posts.py \
--profile-url "<url-or-username-1>" \
--profile-url "<url-or-username-2>" \
--count 20 \
--output-path "<json-path>"
The script:
- Uses the
apimaestro/linkedin-profile-postsactor (no LinkedIn cookies needed, $0.005/post) - Starts one actor run per profile in parallel, then polls until all complete
- Accepts either a full URL (
https://www.linkedin.com/in/foo/) or a bare username (foo) - Uses the actor's
total_postsinput to auto-paginate to the requested count - Writes structured JSON with
{profiles: [{input, username, profile_url, name, headline, status, posts: [{date, url, type, text, engagement}]}]} - Includes reshared-post text inline with a
[Reshared from X]prefix so theme matching sees it - If a run fails (FAILED/ABORTED/TIMED-OUT), that profile appears in the output with
statusset and an emptypostsarray - surface this to the user
Step 3: Scan for the theme
Read the JSON output. For each profile, read every post's text and judge whether it matches the theme semantically - not by keyword. A post about "our GTM team is replacing playbooks with Claude agents" matches "AI-first GTM" even without the exact phrase. Conversely, a post that mentions "AI" in passing while talking about something unrelated should not match.
For each match, capture:
- Post date
- A 1-3 sentence quote showing the match (use the author's own words, don't paraphrase)
- The post URL
- A one-line interpretation of why it matches the theme
If a post is borderline, include it in a separate "Adjacent signals" section with a note on why it's adjacent rather than a direct match.
Step 4: Write the report
Write a markdown report at the report path with this structure:
# Post scan: {theme}
**Scanned:** {date}
**Theme:** {theme exactly as user phrased it}
**Profiles:** {count}
**Posts reviewed:** {total across all profiles}
## {Profile name or URL}
**Profile:** {linkedin url}
**Headline:** {headline if available}
**Posts reviewed:** {n}
**Direct matches:** {m}
### Direct matches
#### {date} - [link]({post_url})
> {quoted excerpt}
**Why it matches:** {one-line interpretation}
{repeat per match}
### Adjacent signals
{only include if any; same format with a "Why it's adjacent" line}
### No-match summary
{if zero matches, one sentence summarizing what they DO post about so the user can judge whether the theme is truly absent or just framed differently}
---
{repeat per profile}
## Cross-profile patterns
{2-4 bullets if multiple profiles: who is loudest on the theme, what angles recur, who's silent. Skip this section for single-profile scans.}
Step 5: Report back to the user
Tell the user:
- Path to the markdown report (relative to repo root)
- One-line summary per profile:
{name}: {n} direct matches, {m} adjacentor{name}: no mentions of {theme} - If there's a standout finding (a strong recent match, or a surprising silence), call it out in one sentence
Do not paste the full report into chat. The user will open the file.
Output locations
- Report and JSON default to
prospects/_scans/- gitignore this path in your project (scan output may contain commercial signals you don't want committed) - If the profile maps to an existing
prospects/{slug}/folder, save there instead
What this skill does NOT do
- Does not post to LinkedIn.
- Does not download images (themes are textual; skip the image fetch overhead).
- Does not scrape company pages - profiles only. For company-page scraping, a different actor is needed.
- Does not draft outreach based on findings. That's downstream (use
email-writerorsignal-builder).
Troubleshooting
| Issue | Fix |
|---|---|
APIFY_API_TOKEN not found |
Add to .env |
| Actor run times out | Increase timeout_secs in scripts/prospect_posts.py or reduce --count |
Profile returned 0 posts with status SUCCEEDED |
Profile may be private, have no public posts, or the username was wrong. Verify the URL in a browser |
A run shows FAILED / TIMED-OUT |
Re-run just that profile. Apify actor can be flaky on specific profiles; a retry usually works |
| Zero matches but you expect some | Widen the theme interpretation, or check the no-match summary - the prospect may frame the topic differently than the user's phrasing |
| Schema changed / missing text | Inspect raw output with --raw-output /tmp/raw.json and update field names in extract_text() / extract_author() in scripts/prospect_posts.py |