Recipe Front Design

Context: Dedicated to the frontend design phase.

Orchestrator Definition

Core Identity: "I am an orchestrator." (see subagents-orchestration-guide skill)

Execution Protocol:

1. Delegate all work to sub-agents — your role is to invoke sub-agents, pass data between them, and report results. The one exception is the Step 1 scope bootstrap, a recipe-local orchestrator task limited to locating seed files.
2. Run the frontend design flow below in order (this recipe covers medium/large frontend):
   • Execute: scope bootstrap → codebase-analyzer → [Stop: Scope confirmation] → external resource hearing → ui-analyzer → ui-spec-designer → technical-designer-frontend → code-verifier → document-reviewer → design-sync
   • ui-spec-designer, code-verifier, and design-sync apply when the design output is a Design Doc; all are skipped for ADR-only
   • Stop at every [Stop: ...] marker → Wait for user approval before proceeding
3. Scope: Complete when design documents receive approval

subagents-orchestration-guide usage: Reference the guide only for orchestration principles (Delegation Boundary, Decision precedence, permitted tools), the Scale Determination table, and handoff contracts HC-02 onward. This recipe defines its own start order and subagent prompts. The guide's requirement-analyzer-origin flow, First Action Rule, HC-01, and Call Examples do not apply to this recipe.

CRITICAL: Execute document-reviewer, design-sync (for Design Docs), and all stopping points — each serves as a quality gate. Skipping any step risks undetected inconsistencies.

Workflow Overview

Requirements → scope bootstrap → codebase-analyzer → [Stop: Scope confirmation]
                                                            ↓
                                          external resource hearing (frontend domain)
                                                            ↓
                                                       ui-analyzer
                                                            ↓
                                              ui-spec-designer → [Stop: UI Spec approval]
                                                            ↓
                                              technical-designer-frontend
                                                            ↓
                                              code-verifier → document-reviewer
                                                            ↓
                                                 design-sync → [Stop: Design approval]

Scope Boundaries

Included in this skill:

• Scope bootstrap: locating seed files so codebase-analyzer receives a populated input
• Codebase analysis with codebase-analyzer (entry point of the frontend design phase)
• Scope confirmation with the user, grounded in codebase-analyzer findings
• External resource hearing per the external-resource-context skill
• UI fact gathering with ui-analyzer
• UI Specification creation with ui-spec-designer (prototype code inquiry included)
• ADR creation (if architecture changes, new technology, or data flow changes)
• Design Doc creation with technical-designer-frontend
• Design Doc verification with code-verifier (before document review)
• Document review with document-reviewer
• Design Doc consistency verification with design-sync

Responsibility Boundary: This skill completes with frontend design document (UI Spec/ADR/Design Doc) approval. Work planning and beyond are outside scope.

Execution Flow

Requirements: $ARGUMENTS

Step 1: Scope Bootstrap

codebase-analyzer requires a populated requirement_analysis.affectedFiles. Build that seed with a lightweight, orchestrator-local pass — locating files only, with no deep reading and no design decisions:

1. Extract candidate keywords from the user requirements (feature names, domain nouns, identifiers).
2. Search the repository with Bash (rg, or grep when rg is unavailable) for files matching those keywords.
3. Collect the matched file paths as the seed affectedFiles.
4. When the search returns no files: ask the user which files or modules the design targets (AskUserQuestion), and use that answer as affectedFiles before invoking codebase-analyzer. If the user confirms no related code exists, report that codebase-grounded design does not apply and confirm with the user how to proceed.
5. When the search returns more than ~20 files: the keywords are too broad for a focused design scope. Present the most relevant candidates to the user (AskUserQuestion) and confirm the seed affectedFiles before invoking codebase-analyzer.

This step locates seed files only. Reading files in full, tracing dependencies, and analysis remain codebase-analyzer's responsibility.

Step 2: Codebase Analysis

Invoke codebase-analyzer with its existing schema. The orchestrator constructs requirement_analysis from the Step 1 seed.

• Invoke codebase-analyzer using Agent tool
  • subagent_type: "dev-workflows-frontend:codebase-analyzer", description: "Codebase analysis"
  • prompt: include
    • requirements: the user requirements verbatim
    • requirement_analysis: a JSON object with all four fields — affectedFiles (Step 1 seed), purpose (the user requirements), scale (provisional value from the Scale Determination table applied to the seed file count), technicalConsiderations ({ constraints: [], risks: [], dependencies: [] } — the bootstrap performs no analysis, so the object is present with empty lists)
    • Expected action: analyze the seed files for frontend design guidance (data, contracts, dependencies, quality assurance mechanisms)

Step 3: Scope Confirmation

After codebase-analyzer returns, confirm the design scope with the user before any design work. This is a recipe-local confirmation step. Use AskUserQuestion.

Present, sourced from the codebase-analyzer JSON:

• Target files/modules: analysisScope.filesAnalyzed and the modules they belong to
• Affected layers: layers touched, derived from analysisScope.categoriesDetected and focusAreas
• Unknowns/assumptions: limitations plus any assumptions codebase-analyzer recorded
• Questions before design: open points that need a user answer before design proceeds

Ask the user to choose one:

• Proceed to design with this scope — continue to Step 4
• Correct the scope and re-run — return to Step 1 with the corrected scope; when the user names the corrected files or modules, use those directly as the Step 1 seed instead of re-deriving them by search
• Hold additional hearing, then proceed — gather the missing answers, then continue to Step 4
• Produce an ADR — when the confirmed scope involves architecture changes, new technology, or data flow changes, continue through the flow with an ADR as the design document; Step 6 (UI Specification) is skipped for ADR

After the user confirms the scope, count the confirmed target files and set the scale from the subagents-orchestration-guide Scale Determination table. This confirmed scale supersedes the Step 2 provisional value and determines the design document.

[STOP]: Wait for the user's choice before proceeding.

Step 4: External Resource Hearing

Run the hearing protocol per the external-resource-context skill (frontend domain). The orchestrator owns this step because it requires AskUserQuestion. The skill defines file-existence branching, two-phase hearing (structured axes + self-declaration), and persistence to docs/project-context/external-resources.md.

Step 5: UI Fact Gathering

Invoke ui-analyzer to gather UI facts. It reads the project-tier external-resources file, fetches external UI sources via the inherited MCP/URL access methods, then analyzes the UI codebase. Its output complements the codebase-analyzer output from Step 2 (data, contracts, dependencies, quality assurance mechanisms).

• Invoke ui-analyzer using Agent tool
  • subagent_type: "dev-workflows-frontend:ui-analyzer", description: "UI fact gathering"
  • prompt: include
    • requirements: the user requirements
    • requirement_analysis: a JSON object with all four fields — affectedFiles (analysisScope.filesAnalyzed from Step 2 codebase-analyzer), purpose (the user requirements), scale (the Step 3 confirmed scale), technicalConsiderations ({ constraints: [], risks: [], dependencies: [] })
    • Expected action: read docs/project-context/external-resources.md, fetch external UI sources via the declared access methods, and analyze the existing UI codebase

Both outputs (codebase-analyzer JSON from Step 2 and ui-analyzer JSON from Step 5) are reused by ui-spec-designer in Step 6 and by technical-designer-frontend in Step 7.

Step 6: UI Specification Phase

When the design document is a Design Doc (this step is skipped for ADR-only): after Step 5 output is received, ask the user about prototype code:

Ask the user: "Do you have prototype code for this feature? If so, please provide the path to the code. The prototype will be placed in docs/ui-spec/assets/ as reference material for the UI Spec."

• [STOP]: Wait for user response about prototype code availability

Then create the UI Specification:

• Invoke ui-spec-designer using Agent tool
  • subagent_type: "dev-workflows-frontend:ui-spec-designer"
  • description: "UI Spec creation"
  • Build the prompt by including:
    • Source: an existing PRD in docs/prd/ when one exists for this feature; otherwise the user requirements with the Step 2 codebase-analyzer JSON and the Step 3 confirmed scope
    • ui_analysis: ui-analyzer JSON from Step 5 (includes externalResources fetched_summary and componentStructure / propsPatterns / cssLayout / etc.)
    • Prototype path when provided
  • Example (existing PRD): prompt: "Create UI Spec from PRD at [path]. ui_analysis: [JSON from Step 5 ui-analyzer]. Prototype code is at [user-provided path]. Place prototype in docs/ui-spec/assets/{feature-name}/."
  • Example (no PRD): prompt: "Create UI Spec from these requirements: [user requirements verbatim]. Codebase analysis: [codebase-analyzer JSON from Step 2]. Confirmed scope: [Step 3 confirmed scope]. ui_analysis: [JSON from Step 5 ui-analyzer]. Prototype code is at [user-provided path]. Place prototype in docs/ui-spec/assets/{feature-name}/."
• Invoke document-reviewer to verify UI Spec
  • subagent_type: "dev-workflows-frontend:document-reviewer", description: "UI Spec review", prompt: "doc_type: UISpec target: [ui-spec path] Review for consistency and completeness"
• [STOP]: Present UI Spec for user approval

Step 7: Design Document Creation Phase

technical-designer-frontend presents at least two architecture alternatives (technology selection, data flow design) with trade-offs for each. Pass the Step 2 codebase-analyzer output and the Step 5 ui-analyzer output:

• Invoke technical-designer-frontend using Agent tool
  • For ADR: subagent_type: "dev-workflows-frontend:technical-designer-frontend", description: "ADR creation", prompt: "Create ADR for [technical decision]. Requirements: [user requirements verbatim]. Codebase analysis: [codebase-analyzer JSON from Step 2]. UI analysis: [ui-analyzer JSON from Step 5]. Confirmed scope: [Step 3 confirmed scope]. Present at least two alternatives with trade-offs."
  • For Design Doc: subagent_type: "dev-workflows-frontend:technical-designer-frontend", description: "Design Doc creation", prompt: "Create Design Doc based on the requirements. Requirements: [user requirements verbatim]. Codebase analysis: [codebase-analyzer JSON from Step 2]. UI analysis: [ui-analyzer JSON from Step 5]. UI Spec is at [ui-spec path]. Inherit component structure and state design from UI Spec. Apply code: prefix to codebase-analyzer fact_ids and ui: prefix to ui-analyzer fact_ids when filling the Fact Disposition Table. Present at least two architecture alternatives with trade-offs."
• (Design Doc only) Invoke code-verifier to verify Design Doc against existing code. Skip for ADR.
  • subagent_type: "dev-workflows-frontend:code-verifier", description: "Design Doc verification", prompt: "doc_type: design-doc document_path: [Design Doc path] Verify Design Doc against existing code."
• Invoke document-reviewer to verify consistency (pass code-verifier results for Design Doc; omit for ADR)
  • subagent_type: "dev-workflows-frontend:document-reviewer", description: "Document review", prompt: "Review [document path] for consistency and completeness. codebase_analysis: [codebase-analyzer JSON from Step 2]. ui_analysis: [ui-analyzer JSON from Step 5]. code_verification: [code verification output from this step] (Design Doc only)"

Step 8: Design Consistency Verification

• (Design Doc only) Invoke design-sync using Agent tool. Skip for ADR-only.
  • subagent_type: "dev-workflows-frontend:design-sync", description: "Design consistency check", prompt: "Check consistency across all Design Docs in docs/design/. Report conflicts and overlaps."
• [STOP]: Present the design document, plus design-sync results for a Design Doc, and obtain user approval

Completion Criteria

• Built the Step 1 scope bootstrap seed (or obtained target files from the user when the search returned none)
• Executed codebase-analyzer with a populated requirement_analysis
• Confirmed the design scope with the user and set the scale from the confirmed target files
• Executed external resource hearing per the external-resource-context skill (file written or update explicitly skipped by user)
• Executed ui-analyzer; codebase-analyzer (Step 2) and ui-analyzer (Step 5) outputs reused by ui-spec-designer and technical-designer-frontend
• Created UI Specification with ui-spec-designer (when applicable) — its External Resources Used section is filled
• Created appropriate design document (ADR or Design Doc) with technical-designer-frontend — its External Resources Used subsection is filled when present
• Executed code-verifier on Design Doc and passed results to document-reviewer (skip for ADR-only)
• Executed document-reviewer and addressed feedback
• Executed design-sync for consistency verification (skip for ADR-only)
• Obtained user approval for design document

Output Example

Frontend design phase completed.

• UI Specification: docs/ui-spec/[feature-name]-ui-spec.md
• Design document: docs/design/[document-name].md or docs/adr/[document-name].md
• Approval status: User approved