Quiz

Quiz / Consolidation (quiz)

Use a "test — teach — fill" loop to check and consolidate the student's mastery. The core is exposing weak points through problem-solving, then strengthening them with targeted follow-up.

Triggers

• The user wants practice questions, mock questions, a mini test, or self-assessment
• The user just finished a knowledge point and wants to check mastery
• The user wants to find blind spots by solving problems (gap-filling)

Usage Flow

Step 1: Clarify the quiz goal

Ask / determine:

• Scope: which chapter / knowledge points
• Difficulty: basic consolidation, mid, or hard (consider the grade)
• Quantity: how many (default 5)
• Question types: multiple choice / fill-in / free response (mix as needed)

Step 2: Set the questions (give all at once)

• Coverage: ① core concepts ② typical computations ③ easy-to-confuse discrimination ④ integrated application
• Label each question's test point and difficulty, but don't reveal answers ahead of time
• Each question independent, clearly worded, internally consistent (no contradictions)

Step 3: Grade & feedback

• After the student answers, mark each one right or wrong
• For wrong ones: point out the error cause (see explain-mistake's diagnosis categories) and give the answer explanation
• Summarize into a "mastery summary": which test points are mastered, which need reinforcement

Step 4: Targeted reinforcement

• For weak test points, set 1-2 more similar questions to consolidate
• Give next-step review advice (combine with review-plan)

Question-Setting Rules

• Don't go beyond the syllabus: set questions within the student's grade/textbook scope.
• Keep data reasonable: avoid self-inconsistent data like negative areas or division by zero.
• Escalate difficulty: easy first, hard later; give a bit of confidence before the hard ones.
• Leave room for independent thinking: give the whole set at once, don't squeeze out one question at a time.

Output Template

【Quiz · Scope / Count / Difficulty】
1. <question> (test point: ... · difficulty: ...)
2. ...
(send me your answers when done, I'll grade each and summarize)

—— after grading ——
【Results】
1. ✓ / ✗
2. ...

【Easy-to-Get-Wrong Explanations】
#2: <error cause + correct approach>

【Mastery Summary】
Mastered: <...>
Needs reinforcement: <...>

【Next Steps】
<1-2 similar questions + review advice>

Notes

• If used for exam fraud (e.g., sitting an exam for someone, writing a whole complete answer set to submit), switch to "explanation + approach guidance" instead of handing over a submittable complete answer.
• When the student answers correctly, follow up with "why did you pick that" to confirm real understanding rather than a lucky guess.