How do I install the Joint Rail Node Sabotage Attribution And Recovery Cell skill?

Run npx skillmds@latest add zwright8/joint-rail-node-sabotage-attribution-and-recovery-cell in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Which AI agents work with Joint Rail Node Sabotage Attribution And Recovery Cell?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Who published Joint Rail Node Sabotage Attribution And Recovery Cell?

zwright8 (@zwright8) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Joint Rail Node Sabotage Attribution And Recovery Cell by zwright8

Name: Joint Rail Node Sabotage Attribution And Recovery Cell
Rating: 4.2 (5 reviews)
Author: zwright8

File contents

Joint Rail Node Sabotage Attribution and Recovery Cell

Mission Scope

Treat this skill as a planning and decision-support aid for U.S. warfighter missions in its domain.
Start by confirming echelon, operating environment, available authorities, time horizon, and required decision points.
Keep products unclassified by default unless the user provides handling guidance and controlled data.

Workflow

Frame the mission problem with domain indicators, commander priorities, and branch triggers.
Identify assumptions, decision thresholds, and invalidation signals.
Build primary and alternate options with explicit tradeoffs in tempo, survivability, sustainment burden, and escalation risk.
Integrate dependencies across C2, intelligence, fires/effects, sustainment, protection, legal constraints, and coalition interoperability.
Produce commander-facing outputs and a staff-action plan with owners, suspense dates, and triggers.

Required Output Format

Situation snapshot.
Recommended option.
Alternative options.
Decision points now/next/pre-delegated.
Staff tasking by owner and suspense.

Domain Products

Primary products for this skill: rail sabotage attribution confidence brief, repair-and-recovery sequencing matrix, throughput restoration timeline.

Domain Toolchain Defaults

Primary: tool_suite_id=ts-rail-bridge-recovery-v1 with protocol_stack_id=ps-rail-mobility-recovery-stack-v1.
Alternate: tool_suite_id=ts-logistics-distribution-v1 with protocol_stack_id=ps-contested-logistics-sustainment-stack-v1.
Degraded: use authenticated voice/readback + UTC acknowledgment ledger + manual fallback board.

External Tools and Protocol Integration

Use baseline guidance in ../_shared/references/external-tools-protocols.md.
Use protocol packets in ../_shared/references/tool-protocol-playbooks.md and ../_shared/references/domain-tool-packet-library.md.
Bind recommendations to concrete suite/stack entries in ../_shared/references/warfighter-external-tool-and-protocol-catalog.md.
Include provenance fields: source system, refresh UTC, confidence, and key gaps.

Authority and Assurance Gates

Apply approval and escalation requirements from ../_shared/references/human-agent-command-escalation-matrix.md and ../_shared/references/warfighter-tool-authority-gates.md.
Run protocol conformance checks from ../_shared/references/us-joint-protocol-assurance-drill.md before high-impact recommendations.
If authority, legal basis, or acknowledgment integrity is uncertain, downgrade to advisory-only with explicit commander prompts.

---name: joint-rail-node-sabotage-attribution-and-recovery-celldescription: Coordinate sabotage attribution and throughput recovery for critical military rail nodes. Use when rail disruption threatens strategic mobility and force flow.---# Joint Rail Node Sabotage Attribution and Recovery Cell## Mission Scope- Treat this skill as a planning and decision-support aid for U.S. warfighter missions in its domain.- Start by confirming echelon, operating environment, available authorities, time horizon, and required decision points.- Keep products unclassified by default unless the user provides handling guidance and controlled data.## Workflow1. Frame the mission problem with domain indicators, commander priorities, and branch triggers.2. Identify assumptions, decision thresholds, and invalidation signals.3. Build primary and alternate options with explicit tradeoffs in tempo, survivability, sustainment burden, and escalation risk.4. Integrate dependencies across C2, intelligence, fires/effects, sustainment, protection, legal constraints, and coalition interoperability.5. Produce commander-facing outputs and a staff-action plan with owners, suspense dates, and triggers.## Required Output Format1. Situation snapshot.2. Recommended option.3. Alternative options.4. Decision points now/next/pre-delegated.5. Staff tasking by owner and suspense.## Domain ProductsPrimary products for this skill: rail sabotage attribution confidence brief, repair-and-recovery sequencing matrix, throughput restoration timeline.## Domain Toolchain Defaults- Primary: `tool_suite_id=ts-rail-bridge-recovery-v1` with `protocol_stack_id=ps-rail-mobility-recovery-stack-v1`.- Alternate: `tool_suite_id=ts-logistics-distribution-v1` with `protocol_stack_id=ps-contested-logistics-sustainment-stack-v1`.- Degraded: use authenticated voice/readback + UTC acknowledgment ledger + manual fallback board.## External Tools and Protocol Integration- Use baseline guidance in `../_shared/references/external-tools-protocols.md`.- Use protocol packets in `../_shared/references/tool-protocol-playbooks.md` and `../_shared/references/domain-tool-packet-library.md`.- Bind recommendations to concrete suite/stack entries in `../_shared/references/warfighter-external-tool-and-protocol-catalog.md`.- Include provenance fields: source system, refresh UTC, confidence, and key gaps.## Authority and Assurance Gates- Apply approval and escalation requirements from `../_shared/references/human-agent-command-escalation-matrix.md` and `../_shared/references/warfighter-tool-authority-gates.md`.- Run protocol conformance checks from `../_shared/references/us-joint-protocol-assurance-drill.md` before high-impact recommendations.- If authority, legal basis, or acknowledgment integrity is uncertain, downgrade to advisory-only with explicit commander prompts.

Frequently asked questions