Adversarial Review · goirik-chakrabarty bundle Review a research paper, proposal, or technical writeup by spawning five constructive reviewer archetypes — the Steelman-Builder, Assumption Auditor, Mechanism Seeker, Generous Skeptic, and Contextualizer — each of whom reads critically and curiously and writes a focused review, then synthesizes them into a meta-review with the crux and a decision. Use whenever the user wants a paper, draft, abstract, experiment plan, or research idea pressure-tested, red-teamed, or "reviewed like ICLR/NeurIPS," asks for "reviews of my paper," wants to know how reviewers will react before submitting, or asks to find the weaknesses in a technical argument. Trigger even when the user just says "review this," "tear this apart," or "what would reviewers say," as long as the artifact is a research or technical document.
