← all publishers

m1n-n9

@m1n-n9 source repo

4 published skills

  1. Academic Figures Drawer · m1n-n9 bundle
    Create camera-ready, editable draw.io figures from papers, method descriptions, code, or reference images. Use for ICML, NeurIPS/NIPS, ICLR, and similar ML/AI research figures: concise framework overviews, module-detail diagrams, tensor and attention flows, ablations, training/inference pipelines, and downstream-task panels. Optionally use image generation for a non-semantic visual concept or input/context asset, then translate the approved semantics into vector draw.io XML with preview, static validation, and screenshot-driven refinement.
    0 installs
  2. Academic Ppt Master · m1n-n9 bundle
    Turn papers, PDFs, documents, URLs, or Markdown into editable academic PowerPoint decks through a structured SVG-to-PPTX workflow. Use when the user asks to make an academic PPT, paper-reading deck, journal-club deck, thesis defense deck, research presentation, "生成PPT", "做PPT", "制作演示文稿", or mentions "academic-ppt-master".
    0 installs
  3. Review Revision · m1n-n9 bundle
    Review and revise academic papers with a senior-reviewer workflow. Use when an AI research/coding agent needs to work on an existing paper draft, PDF, LaTeX project, Word document, markdown manuscript, rejected paper, or paper idea that already has a concrete direction, and produce: paper maps, weakness audits, insight/novelty checks, reviewer objections, claim-experiment matrices, theory/proof checks, experiment plans, statistics/reproducibility audits, figure/table audits, ethics/compliance checks, revision plans, detailed section edits, or final submission checklists.
    0 installs
  4. Rebuttal Response · m1n-n9 bundle
    Plan, triage, and write academic rebuttals and review responses. Use when an AI research agent needs to handle conference, journal, workshop, or grant reviews; classify reviewer concerns; decide what evidence or experiments can change the decision; write an AC-facing executive summary; draft per-reviewer responses; correct factual misunderstandings without sounding hostile; handle novelty, baseline, method, experiment, clarity, and scope objections; or produce a final rebuttal checklist.
    0 installs