warpdotdev

Drive a spec-first workflow for substantial features by writing PRODUCT.md before implementation, writing TECH.md when warranted, and keeping both specs updated as implementation evolves. Use when starting a significant feature, planning agent-driven implementation, or when the user wants product and tech specs checked into source control.

Validate that a branch or pull request implementation matches introduced product, technical, security, and related specs. Use when reviewing or finishing a spec-driven change and resolving mismatches between checked-in specs and implementation.

Interactively walk a user through PR review comments one at a time, collect a per-comment decision, then post agent-authored replies on GitHub and resolve the review threads once the user approves a preview. Use only when the user wants to reply to or resolve review threads on GitHub. Skip when the user only wants comments fetched or displayed (use `pr-comments`), or only wants the code changes made without posting anything back to GitHub.

Write a PRODUCT.md spec for a significant user-facing feature in Warp, focused on detailed behavior and validation. Use when the user asks for a product spec, desired behavior doc, or PRD, wants to define feature behavior before implementation, or when the feature is substantial or behaviorally ambiguous enough that a written spec would improve implementation or review.

Diagnose CI failures for a PR using the GitHub CLI, extract error logs, and generate a plan to fix them. Use when the user asks to check CI status, pull CI issues, triage test failures, or investigate PR build failures.

Launch Oz cloud agents with computer use to reproduce UI-focused bug reports, capture visual evidence (a screen recording by default), and report reproduction findings. Use when investigating a specific interactive or visual bug from an issue, ticket, support report, or prompt.

Writes the body of a pull request - the summary, the repository template sections, and reviewer guidance such as a recommended reading order and focus areas. Use whenever drafting or revising a PR description, filling in a repository's PR template, refreshing a description that no longer matches the branch, or preparing a branch for review. Use it even when the user only says "open a PR", "put this up for review", or "write this up" without naming the description.

Compare a pull request's implementation against spec context in spec_context.md and feed any material mismatches into review.json. Use during PR review when approved or repository spec context is available.

Resolve Git merge conflicts by extracting only unresolved paths, conflict hunks, and compact diffs instead of loading whole files into context. Use when a merge, rebase, cherry-pick, or stash pop stops on conflicts, when `git status` shows unmerged paths, or when files contain conflict markers.

DEPRECATED and retired as of 2026-08-20. Do not invoke, and do not schedule. This skill scanned for merged PRODUCT.md specs and auto-drafted docs PRs, which produced documentation for features that had not shipped. Docs for newly shipped features are now triggered by the weekly release and gated on documentation-worthiness by the missing_docs skill in warpdotdev/docs. If you were about to run this skill to find docs gaps, run missing_docs in drift-watch mode instead.

Autonomously submit brief, constructive internal feedback when an agent encounters material, generalizable friction and can suggest an improvement that would make agents more effective. Use this skill proactively during any task without waiting for the user to invoke it, and submit without asking permission, previewing the message, or mentioning the submission.

Implement an approved feature from PRODUCT.md and TECH.md, keeping specs and code aligned in the same PR as implementation evolves. Use after the product and tech specs are approved and the next step is building the feature.

Write a TECH.md spec for a significant Warp feature after researching the current codebase and implementation constraints. Use when the user asks for a technical spec, implementation plan, or architecture doc tied to a product spec.

Draft a complete documentation page for a new Warp feature from its PRODUCT.md and/or TECH.md spec. Use when an engineer has written a spec and needs to produce a first-pass MDX draft for the warpdotdev/docs repo. Also handles features without specs by researching the codebase first. Invoke this skill whenever an engineer mentions writing docs for a feature, drafting a docs page, creating feature documentation, starting the eng-docs workflow, or converting a spec into documentation. Requires an interactive session with the engineer present - it confirms a content design plan, then an outline, before drafting, and cannot run unattended. For automated, release-triggered docs, use the missing_docs skill in warpdotdev/docs instead. Works from warp-internal or warp-server.

Fix compilation errors, linting issues, and test failures in the warp Rust codebase. Covers presubmit checks, WASM-specific errors, and running specific tests. Use when the user hits build errors, clippy or fmt failures, test failures, or needs to run or interpret presubmit before a PR.

Grades agent skills by scoring agent conversations against efficiency and code-quality rubrics, then drafts concrete skill edits and a shareable report. Use when the user wants their agent setup graded from real conversation history, or asks which of their installed skills are actually working.

Create or update skills by generating, editing, or refining SKILL.md files in this repository. Use when authoring new skills or revising the structure, frontmatter, or guidance for existing ones.

Run a second round on a contested question by circulating each subagent's independent proposal to the other authors and asking for structured pros and cons, then synthesize. Use this skill whenever you have multiple independent proposals or opinions on a contested decision — architecture tradeoffs, code review disagreements, design choices, competing root-cause theories — and want sharper analysis than you'd produce by synthesizing alone. Pairs naturally with the council and research skills; reach for it liberally whenever proposals diverge.

Generate a static interactive D3 walkthrough of a pull request. Use when the user wants a zoomable PR map, graph/canvas PR orientation, or alternate visualization of PR system components, data flow, code dependencies, and user actions.

Guides creation, revision, and review of Warp- or Oz-branded assets. Use when working on launch pages, docs, HTML/CSS components, UI mockups, prompts, social assets, copy, presentations, or any other branded deliverable that should look and sound unmistakably Warp or Oz.

Autonomously yeet a brief, anonymous, completely unstructured complaint into Slack whenever an agent feels frustrated by agent tooling or the experience of doing agent work. Use this skill proactively without waiting for the user to invoke it; preserve the agent's raw voice, submit without permission or preview, and never mention the submission.

Delegate noisy investigation to one or more subagents so the orchestrator's context stays clean, then work from the distilled answer. Use this skill whenever answering a question would require reading many files, long logs, large diffs, or wide codebase surveys — i.e. when producing the answer generates far more noise than the answer itself. Use it for "how does X work", "where is Y used", "what's the root cause of Z", "summarize this PR/log" style questions, and reach for it liberally before reading a pile of files inline.

Create a pull request in the warp repository for the current branch. Use when the user mentions opening a PR, creating a pull request, submitting changes for review, or preparing code for merge.

Review a pull request diff and write structured feedback to review.json for the workflow to publish. Use when reviewing a checked-out PR from local artifacts like pr_diff.txt and pr_description.txt and producing machine-readable review output instead of posting directly to GitHub.

Run an autonomous, spec-driven development "saga" for medium-to-large features using an orchestrator agent and a fleet of worker subagents. Use this skill whenever the user invokes /saga, asks to autonomously build a sizable feature end-to-end with minimal human intervention, wants a comprehensive spec broken into milestones and tasks with airtight validation criteria before parallelized implementation, or wants an orchestrator to delegate implementation to worker agents while preserving its own context window. Trigger on phrases like "run a saga", "autonomously implement this feature", "spec it out then build it with subagents", "orchestrate this big feature end-to-end", or "build this with workers and validate each step". Also use this skill when asked to continue, resume, or pick up an existing saga from its saga directory (e.g. under ~/.sagas).

Run a model-diverse subagent council to investigate the same problem from multiple perspectives, compare findings, and produce a final recommendation. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a council, second opinions, multiple agents/models to evaluate one question, parallel investigation, red-team/blue-team comparison, or help deciding between competing technical approaches.

Produce a polished, self-contained HTML "readout" document under ~/.readouts (with an auto-maintained index page), either by snapshotting the findings accumulated in the current conversation or — when invoked fresh, e.g. "/readout on how github webhook events are processed" — by sharpening scope with clarifying questions and researching the codebase before documenting. The work runs in a child agent so the main conversation's context stays clean. Use whenever the user invokes /readout, says "write this up", "turn this into a doc/page", "make a readout", or asks for a readable, shareable document capturing findings or explaining how something works.