Literature Review Agent Skills

Orients researchers to an unfamiliar academic field by searching Consensus, building a strategic search plan with PICO or other frameworks, and synthesizing findings into a formatted Word document.

Coordinates a 13-agent team for rigorous academic research on any topic, supporting eight modes from quick briefs to systematic reviews with meta-analysis.

Orchestrates the full academic research pipeline from exploration to final manuscript, coordinating research, writing, integrity verification, peer review, revision, and finalization stages with user confirmation checkpoints.

Simulates a complete international journal peer review process with 5 dynamically configured reviewers, producing structured editorial decisions and revision roadmaps.

Search 10 academic literature APIs for papers, preprints, citations, and open-access full text with reproducible provenance.

Search scientific papers and retrieve structured experimental data extracted from full-text studies via the BGPT MCP server, returning 25+ fields per paper including methods, results, sample sizes, quality scores, and conclusions.

Conduct systematic literature reviews by searching multiple academic databases, synthesizing findings, and generating professionally formatted documents with verified citations.

Systematically evaluate scholarly work using the ScholarEval framework, providing structured assessment across research quality dimensions including problem formulation, methodology, analysis, and writing with quantitative scoring and actionable feedback.

Formulate testable hypotheses from observations, design experiments, and generate predictions using a structured scientific method framework.

Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality by assessing experimental design, identifying biases and confounders, and applying evidence grading frameworks like GRADE and Cochrane Risk of Bias.

Prüft Frist, Form, Zuständigkeit, Rechtsweg und Sofortmaßnahmen bei Bona Fides im Römischen Recht; liefert eine Fristen- und Risikoampel mit Sofortschritten.

Prüft Frist, Form, Zuständigkeit, Rechtsweg und Sofortmaßnahmen für Stipulatio im Römischen Recht; liefert eine Fristen- und Risikoampel mit Sofortschritten.

Search and retrieve academic papers from arXiv via their REST API, including citation data from Semantic Scholar.

Search scientific papers via the BGPT MCP server and retrieve structured experimental data — methods, results, conclusions, quality scores, and 25+ metadata fields per paper.

Simulates a NeurIPS/SC/ICSE-style peer review with five reviewer personas (HPC, ML, Stats, Reproducibility, Devil's Advocate) that verify every claim against actual result data before submission.

Iteratively improves a compiled LaTeX paper through two rounds of external LLM review, fix implementation, and recompilation.

Provides nine skills for Nature-journal-family academic publishing, covering figure creation, prose polishing, manuscript writing, citation formatting, data availability statements, paper reading, reviewer responses, paper-to-PPT conversion, and academic search via an MCP server.

Runs a multi-agent academic research pipeline covering systematic review, LaTeX paper writing, peer review, and end-to-end orchestration with integrity gates.

Explains cell structure, organelles, signaling pathways, and cell cycle regulation for biology study and research.

Search, filter, and browse high-signal academic papers using the Paperzilla CLI.

Searches for academic papers, downloads PDFs, and analyzes content through four core research assistant commands.

Organize research by managing references, notes, and collaboration across Google Drive, Docs, Sheets, and Gmail.

Finds academic papers on arXiv, checks citation counts via Semantic Scholar, and generates BibTeX entries.

Searches, downloads, analyzes, and saves research papers using arXiv, Google Scholar, and Zotero.

Compiles any research input — PDF papers, GitHub repositories, experiment logs, code directories, or raw notes — into a complete Agent-Native Research Artifact (ARA) with cognitive layer (claims, concepts, heuristics), physical layer (configs, code stubs), exploration graph, and grounded evidence. Use when ingesting a.

Audits medical LLM benchmarks across five lifecycle phases using 46 medically tailored criteria to assess clinical relevance, data integrity, safety-critical capabilities, validity, and governance.

Provides reviewer-style audit and deep review for academic papers in LaTeX, Typst, and PDF formats, producing structured issue bundles, pass/fail gates, and revision roadmaps.

Verifies every bibliographic entry in a paper for existence, metadata accuracy, and contextual support using web/DBLP/arXiv lookups, flagging hallucinated authors, wrong years, fabricated venues, and misattributed citations.

Delegates scientific literature searches to the Edison API, which autonomously searches hundreds of papers and returns a cited answer. Handles query submission, polling, and reporting results.

Produces academic papers, literature reviews, grant proposals, and clinical reports with LaTeX formatting and verified citations, using research-lookup and parallel-web skills.

Audits a paper draft by tracing every numeric claim and assertion back to result files on disk, flagging untraced, mismatched, stale, uncited, and phantom references.

Computes bibliometric indices for AI/NLP conferences, including QQE, average/median citations, and citation inequality, from annual publication and citation data.

Evaluates the throughput and resource allocation efficiency of RIS-aided mobile edge computing systems by measuring the total computation task bits successfully completed under varying network conditions.

Orchestrates evidence-based research across local PDFs, scholarly search, citation-context tools, web sources, and code repositories to produce traceable syntheses with counterevidence audits.