EACL Skills
A 12-skill depth pack for EACL (Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics) submissions built around ACL Rolling Review: single-cycle timing, ARR submission checks, author response, commitment to EACL, camera-ready, artifacts, reproducibility, the Responsible NLP checklist, writing style, related work, experiments, and workflow. Grounded in the EACL 2027 CF
Skills in this plugin
11- ▌ Eacl Submission · brycewang-stanfordUse when auditing an EACL submission before its single ACL Rolling Review cycle deadline, covering ACL-template compliance, the 8-page long / 4-page short content caps, the mandatory Limitations section, the Responsible NLP checklist, anonymization, preprint and resubmission declarations, and the no-fallback-cycle timing trap.
- ▌ Eacl Experiments · brycewang-stanfordUse when designing or auditing the empirical evidence for an EACL paper, covering tuned and LLM baselines, multilingual breadth matched to the claim, significance and variance floors, human-evaluation agreement, data-contamination controls, ablations, and error taxonomies, so that every stated result is measured rather than asserted.
- ▌ Eacl Camera Ready · brycewang-stanfordUse when preparing an EACL or Findings-of-ACL-EACL camera-ready after commitment acceptance, covering the extra content page, de-anonymization, AI-assistance disclosure, satisfying the meta-review's required changes, ACL Anthology metadata and CC BY licensing, registration and presentation obligations, and the public artifact release.
- ▌ Eacl Related Work · brycewang-stanfordUse when positioning an EACL paper against fast-moving NLP literature, covering ACL-Anthology-first citation, correct Findings attribution, handling concurrent preprints fairly, freshness sweeps across recent *ACL rounds and European venues like LREC-COLING, and framing related work as a contrastive argument rather than a list.
- ▌ Eacl Supplementary · brycewang-stanfordUse when organizing an EACL paper's body, mandatory Limitations section, appendices, and anonymized supplementary archive so that no decision-critical content hides where ACL Rolling Review reviewers are not obliged to read, and so the content-page budget carries the whole argument on its own.
- ▌ Eacl Writing Style · brycewang-stanfordUse when revising an EACL paper's prose for a task-first first page, a concrete page-one example, scoped LLM-era claims, quantified error analysis, an anonymity-safe voice, honest Limitations, and compression into the 8-page long or 4-page short content budget without pushing the argument into appendices.
- ▌ Eacl Review Process · brycewang-stanfordUse when reasoning about the EACL review pipeline through ACL Rolling Review, covering reviewers and the action editor's meta-review, the commitment step where EACL decides main versus Findings versus reject, ethics escalation, confidentiality, and when to route a reviewed package to a sibling *ACL venue.
- ▌ Eacl Author Response · brycewang-stanfordUse when drafting an EACL author response during the ACL Rolling Review rebuttal window, covering how to triage reviewer points, address the action editor who writes the meta-review, answer NLP objection patterns, run in-window experiments, flag deficient reviews, and decide respond-now versus revise-for-a-later-venue given EACL's single cycle.
- ▌ Eacl Reproducibility · brycewang-stanfordUse when running the Responsible NLP checklist as a claims audit for an EACL paper, covering hyperparameter and compute disclosure, verbatim prompt and decoding reporting, data-contamination stance, variance and significance reporting, multilingual coverage claims, and consistency between the checklist answers and what the paper actually contains.
- ▌ Eacl Topic Selection · brycewang-stanfordUse when deciding whether a project is EACL-shaped or better routed to ACL, EMNLP, NAACL, AACL, TACL, Computational Linguistics, LREC-COLING, COLM, or an ML venue, covering the long-versus-short choice, the accept-Findings calculus, and how EACL's single ARR cycle and irregular cadence affect the routing decision.
- ▌ Eacl Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanfordUse when packaging code, data, prompts, model outputs, and annotation materials for an EACL submission, first as an anonymized ACL Rolling Review supplement aligned with the Responsible NLP checklist, then as a public post-acceptance ACL Anthology release, with attention to licensing, dataset documentation, and reproduction instructions.