How do I install the Eacl Topic Selection skill?

Run npx skillmds@latest add brycewang-stanford/eacl-topic-selection in your terminal (requires Node.js), paste this page's agent-chat prompt into Claude, Cursor, or any MCP-connected agent, or download the SKILL.md file and copy it into your agent's skills directory.

Is Eacl Topic Selection safe to use?

This skill has not completed SkillMD's automated safety review yet. Capability flags: docs only. SkillMD never runs a skill's scripts for you; review the SKILL.md before installing.

Which AI agents work with Eacl Topic Selection?

This skill is tagged as working with Claude Code, Claude.ai, OpenAI Codex. SKILL.md is an open format, so most agents that read a skills directory can load it too.

Is Eacl Topic Selection free to use?

Yes. Installing skills from SkillMD is free, and the skill stays under its author's original license.

Who published Eacl Topic Selection?

brycewang-stanford (@brycewang-stanford) published this skill. Their other Agent Skills are listed on their SkillMD profile.

Eacl Topic Selection by brycewang-stanford

Name: Eacl Topic Selection
Rating: 4.2 (5 reviews)
Author: brycewang-stanford

Eacl Topic Selection

Use when deciding whether a project is EACL-shaped or better routed to ACL, EMNLP, NAACL, AACL, TACL, Computational Linguistics, LREC-COLING, COLM, or an ML venue, covering the long-versus-short choice, the accept-Findings calculus, and how EACL's single ARR cycle and irregular cadence affect the routing decision.

brycewang-stanford Updated Sep 8, 2026 1k repo stars

File contents

EACL Topic Selection

Use this before committing effort to route a project to the right venue. EACL is the ACL's European Chapter meeting — all of CL/NLP is in scope, with a community and location that make it a natural home for multilingual and lower-resourced-language work — but "could go to EACL" and "is best at EACL" are different questions. Decide by fit, timing, and the alternatives.

Is it EACL-shaped?

Strong EACL fits share a profile:

A well-scoped NLP question answered with careful, often multilingual, controls.
Analysis, critique, resources, or evaluation-integrity contributions are welcome, not only new systems — EACL best papers routinely go to these (see ../../resources/exemplars/library.md).
Work on European and neighbouring-region languages or lower-resourced settings has a receptive audience, though topical scope is not region-restricted.

Route-elsewhere signals

Signal	Better venue
Flagship-scale result wanting the largest audience	ACL
Empirical-methods framing, autumn timeline	EMNLP
North-American-hosted edition timing fits better	NAACL
Asia-Pacific community/timing fits better	AACL
Polished journal-length result, no page pressure	TACL or Computational Linguistics
Language-resource / corpus / multilingual dataset paper	LREC-COLING
Language-model-centric contribution	COLM
Core-ML method with NLP as one application	an ML venue (NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR)

Timing dominates the decision for EACL

EACL draws from a single ARR cycle with no fallback (August 2026 for EACL 2027) and runs on an irregular cadence. So routing is not only about fit: if the one cycle does not fit your timeline, a sibling venue with a nearer cycle may be the rational choice even for an EACL-shaped paper.
Conversely, if the cycle fits and the paper is EACL-shaped, the early-spring slot gets your result out ahead of the summer/autumn venues.

Long vs short

Choose short (4 pages) when:
  - one clean claim with decisive evidence
  - a focused analysis, resource, or negative result
Choose long (8 pages) when:
  - multiple contributions or a method needing full development
  - breadth (many languages/tasks) is itself the argument
A short idea padded to long reads as thin; a long idea cut to short reads as incomplete.

The accept-Findings calculus

Findings of ACL: EACL is archival and Anthology-published. Accept it when the work is solid but not top-tier for the main track and you value a timely, citable record; push for main or re-route when main-conference visibility is essential and the reviews support it.
Because there is no next EACL cycle to retry, weigh a Findings offer against the real alternative (a different conference months later), not against an imaginary next EACL round.

Output format

[EACL fit] Strong / Marginal / Poor
[Why] <scope + community + contribution-type reasons>
[Timing check] <does the single ARR cycle fit? fallback venue if not>
[Better venue if any] <ACL/EMNLP/NAACL/AACL/TACL/CL/LREC-COLING/COLM/ML>
[Long vs short] <recommendation>
[Findings stance] <accept / push-for-main / re-route>

---name: eacl-topic-selectiondescription: Use when deciding whether a project is EACL-shaped or better routed to ACL, EMNLP, NAACL, AACL, TACL, Computational Linguistics, LREC-COLING, COLM, or an ML venue, covering the long-versus-short choice, the accept-Findings calculus, and how EACL's single ARR cycle and irregular cadence affect the routing decision.---# EACL Topic SelectionUse this before committing effort to route a project to the right venue. EACL is the ACL's**European Chapter** meeting — all of CL/NLP is in scope, with a community and location that makeit a natural home for multilingual and lower-resourced-language work — but "could go to EACL" and"is best at EACL" are different questions. Decide by fit, timing, and the alternatives.## Is it EACL-shaped?Strong EACL fits share a profile:- A **well-scoped NLP question** answered with careful, often multilingual, controls.- **Analysis, critique, resources, or evaluation-integrity** contributions are welcome, not only new systems — EACL best papers routinely go to these (see `../../resources/exemplars/library.md`).- Work on **European and neighbouring-region languages** or lower-resourced settings has a receptive audience, though topical scope is not region-restricted.## Route-elsewhere signals| Signal | Better venue ||---|---|| Flagship-scale result wanting the largest audience | ACL || Empirical-methods framing, autumn timeline | EMNLP || North-American-hosted edition timing fits better | NAACL || Asia-Pacific community/timing fits better | AACL || Polished journal-length result, no page pressure | TACL or Computational Linguistics || Language-resource / corpus / multilingual dataset paper | LREC-COLING || Language-model-centric contribution | COLM || Core-ML method with NLP as one application | an ML venue (NeurIPS/ICML/ICLR) |## Timing dominates the decision for EACL- EACL draws from a **single ARR cycle with no fallback** (August 2026 for EACL 2027) and runs on an **irregular cadence**. So routing is not only about fit: if the one cycle does not fit your timeline, a sibling venue with a nearer cycle may be the rational choice even for an EACL-shaped paper.- Conversely, if the cycle fits and the paper is EACL-shaped, the early-spring slot gets your result out ahead of the summer/autumn venues.## Long vs short```textChoose short (4 pages) when: - one clean claim with decisive evidence - a focused analysis, resource, or negative resultChoose long (8 pages) when: - multiple contributions or a method needing full development - breadth (many languages/tasks) is itself the argumentA short idea padded to long reads as thin; a long idea cut to short reads as incomplete.```## The accept-Findings calculus- **Findings of ACL: EACL** is archival and Anthology-published. Accept it when the work is solid but not top-tier for the main track and you value a timely, citable record; push for main or re-route when main-conference visibility is essential and the reviews support it.- Because there is no next EACL cycle to retry, weigh a Findings offer against the real alternative (a different conference months later), not against an imaginary next EACL round.## Output format```text[EACL fit] Strong / Marginal / Poor[Why] <scope + community + contribution-type reasons>[Timing check] <does the single ARR cycle fit? fallback venue if not>[Better venue if any] <ACL/EMNLP/NAACL/AACL/TACL/CL/LREC-COLING/COLM/ML>[Long vs short] <recommendation>[Findings stance] <accept / push-for-main / re-route>```

Frequently asked questions