ECCV Skills
A 12-skill depth pack for ECCV submissions: venue fit across the even-year cycle, OpenReview submission checks, one-page rebuttals, Springer LNCS camera-ready, artifacts, reproducibility, supplementary material, review process, writing style, related work, experiments, and workflow. Grounded in official ECCV 2026 pages, the OpenReview group, Springer LNCS proceedings, and ECVA sources checked on 2
Skills in this plugin
11- ▌ Eccv Submission · brycewang-stanfordUse when auditing an ECCV submission for the two-step registration-then-paper deadline chain, the 14-page LNCS single-column limit, CET (not AoE) cutoffs, the trailing supplementary deadline, double-blind rules, the four-page dual-submission definition, the social-media embargo, and reviewer-duty exposure before upload.
- ▌ Eccv Experiments · brycewang-stanfordUse when designing or auditing the experimental program of an ECCV paper — benchmark selection that survives a September conference, matched-substrate baseline fairness in the foundation-model era, ablations that isolate the claimed mechanism, qualitative failure evidence, and run sequencing toward a March freeze.
- ▌ Eccv Camera Ready · brycewang-stanfordUse when preparing an accepted ECCV paper for Springer LNCS publication — the enlarged final page budget, Springer author kit and licensing, the June 30 AoE camera-ready cutoff in 2026, registration as a publication condition, ECVA open-access mirroring about four weeks before the conference, and arXiv synchronization.
- ▌ Eccv Related Work · brycewang-stanfordUse when positioning an ECCV submission in the literature — covering the two intervening CVPR/ICCV cycles since the last ECCV, March-deadline concurrent-work conventions, the no-self-repo citation rule, Springer-vs-CVF venue attribution hygiene, and turning a numbered LNCS bibliography into an argument.
- ▌ Eccv Supplementary · brycewang-stanfordUse when assembling ECCV supplementary material under its own deadline one week after the paper (March 12 in 2026) — deciding what belongs in the extra week's upload, video and qualitative-result packaging, anonymity scrubbing of archives, and keeping the 14-page LNCS body self-contained.
- ▌ Eccv Writing Style · brycewang-stanfordUse when writing or revising an ECCV paper in the Springer LNCS single-column format — spending the 14-page budget (figures and tables included), LNCS-specific layout craft, first-page architecture for a mixed European panel, numbered-citation hygiene, and claims phrased to survive a one-page rebuttal.
- ▌ Eccv Review Process · brycewang-stanfordUse when modeling how ECCV review actually works — the OpenReview pipeline from March registration to June decisions, the 2026 reviewer-duty enforcement that desk-rejects authors of late or LLM-written reviews, rebuttal-to-AC-discussion dynamics, and what the ECVA-run, Springer-published structure means for outcomes.
- ▌ Eccv Author Response · brycewang-stanfordUse when drafting an ECCV rebuttal — the optional one-page, two-column PDF answering three-plus reviews inside a nine-day window (reviews May 2, rebuttal due May 11 in 2026), with references counted inside the page, no venue-forbidden extras, and arguments sized for the area-chair discussion that follows.
- ▌ Eccv Reproducibility · brycewang-stanfordUse when hardening the reproducibility story of an ECCV paper — training recipes and schedules readers can re-run, dataset versioning and split provenance, pinned foundation-model dependencies, compute disclosure, and seed/variance honesty for benchmark deltas, sized for the 14-page LNCS body plus supplement.
- ▌ Eccv Topic Selection · brycewang-stanfordUse when deciding whether a computer-vision project should target ECCV — weighing the two-year even-year cadence against CVPR, ICCV, WACV, BMVC, ACCV, NeurIPS, and journal routes, testing whether the work matches ECCV's breadth from geometry to vision-language, and reading the Koenderink Prize lineage as a durability signal.
- ▌ Eccv Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanfordUse when packaging code, models, and data around an ECCV paper — the anonymous review-time archive under the trailing supplement deadline, the do-not-cite-your-own-repo rule, and the June-to-September post-acceptance runway for a public release aligned with the ECVA and Springer copies of the paper.