SIGGRAPH Skills

A 12-skill depth pack for the ACM SIGGRAPH Technical Papers program, whose accepted research is published as a special issue of ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG): the journal-integrated dual-track (Journal vs Conference) model, the Linklings single-round review with a 1000-word text-only rebuttal and a Technical Papers Committee meeting, conditional acceptance plus second-stage verification, the

by @brycewang-stanford 12 skills

Install

npx skillmds@latest add plugin:brycewang-stanford/siggraph-skills

One command, no setup. In Claude Code it lands as a managed plugin you can enable, disable or remove with /plugin. On any other agent it installs the 12 skills into that agent's own folder.

Or inside Claude Code

In the Plugins tab, add this marketplace:

skillmds/skillmd
/plugin install brycewang-stanford-siggraph-skills@skillmd

Adds the marketplace once; later plugins need the second line only.

Or install by hand

Download the plugin and unzip its skills/ folder into your agent's skills directory. Works with every agent, no CLI needed.

Download plugin Paths per agent

Just the markdown? SKILL.md files only.

This plugin

skills: 12
authors: 1

Published by a registry member. Review its skills before installing.

Skills in this plugin

▌
Siggraph Workflow · brycewang-stanford
Use to plan a SIGGRAPH or SIGGRAPH Asia Technical Papers campaign backward from the deadline, covering the two annual cycles, the form-then-upload two-step submission, the rebuttal window, the Technical Papers Committee decision, conditional-accept second-stage revision, TOG camera-ready, and the in-person presentation.

1k repo stars
▌
Siggraph Submission · brycewang-stanford
Use when auditing an ACM SIGGRAPH / SIGGRAPH Asia Technical Papers submission for Linklings readiness, covering the two-step form-then-upload deadline, the acmart (>=2.16) format and the 7-page conference-track budget, the dual-track vs Journal-only choice, the mandatory representative image and supplemental video, and desk-risk triage before the UTC cutoff.

1k repo stars
▌
Siggraph Experiments · brycewang-stanford
Use when designing or auditing the evaluation of a SIGGRAPH / TOG paper, covering head-to-head comparisons against the strongest prior method, ablations, performance/timing reporting with hardware, image/geometry quality metrics, perceptual and user studies, and matching the evidence to the graphics claim shape.

1k repo stars
▌
Siggraph Camera Ready · brycewang-stanford
Use when preparing the final version of a conditionally accepted SIGGRAPH / SIGGRAPH Asia Technical Paper for publication in ACM Transactions on Graphics, covering the second-stage committee verification, TOG journal metadata and DOI, ACM rights and CCS concepts, final results video and representative image, and permanent code/data links.

1k repo stars
▌
Siggraph Related Work · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing or auditing the related-work positioning of a SIGGRAPH / TOG paper, covering the computer-graphics literature lanes (rendering, geometry, animation, simulation, imaging, fabrication, learning-for-graphics), capability-delta positioning against the strongest prior method, and correct attribution across SIGGRAPH, SIGGRAPH Asia, TOG, EG/CGF, and sibling venues.

1k repo stars
▌
Siggraph Supplementary · brycewang-stanford
Use when planning the SIGGRAPH / TOG supplemental package, especially the results video that reviewers weight heavily, plus comparison galleries, additional results, code and data, and appendices, and when deciding what evidence must live in the 7-page body versus the supplemental material.

1k repo stars
▌
Siggraph Writing Style · brycewang-stanford
Use when structuring or revising a SIGGRAPH / TOG technical paper, covering the teaser figure, a results-first first page, the graphics contribution framing (technique + quality/performance), comparison-driven evaluation, honest limitations, and the acmart 7-page discipline for the conference track.

1k repo stars
▌
Siggraph Review Process · brycewang-stanford
Use to model the SIGGRAPH / SIGGRAPH Asia Technical Papers review pipeline and calibrate expectations, covering the single 6-point score scale, the primary/secondary/tertiary reviewer structure, the 1000-word rebuttal, the Technical Papers Committee meeting, conditional acceptance with second-stage verification, and the dual-track Journal-vs-Conference decision.

1k repo stars
▌
Siggraph Author Response · brycewang-stanford
Use when writing the SIGGRAPH / SIGGRAPH Asia Technical Papers rebuttal, the single 1000-word text-only author response uploaded during the rebuttal window to correct factual errors and answer specific reviewer questions before the Technical Papers Committee meeting, and when planning the change list for a conditionally accepted paper's second-stage revision.

1k repo stars
▌
Siggraph Reproducibility · brycewang-stanford
Use when building the reproducibility story for a SIGGRAPH / TOG paper, covering deterministic result regeneration, scene/mesh/weight provenance, hardware and timing disclosure, floating-point and GPU non-determinism, and a code/data release that a reader or a Graphics Replicability Stamp volunteer can actually run.

1k repo stars
▌
Siggraph Topic Selection · brycewang-stanford
Use before committing a project to SIGGRAPH / SIGGRAPH Asia / TOG, to decide whether the contribution is graphics-shaped and which venue and track fit, routing among SIGGRAPH, SIGGRAPH Asia, direct-to-TOG, and siblings (CVPR/ICCV, CHI/UIST, Eurographics/EGSR/SGP/SCA/HPG/I3D), and whether to aim dual-track or Journal-only.

1k repo stars
▌
Siggraph Artifact Evaluation · brycewang-stanford
Use when pursuing the Graphics Replicability Stamp (GRSI) or Code Replicability in Computer Graphics (CRCG) recognition for an accepted SIGGRAPH / TOG paper, covering how graphics replicability differs from ACM artifact badging, what volunteers actually run, deterministic result reproduction, Software Heritage archiving, and the separate post-acceptance timing.

1k repo stars