Results for “agent-team”

Designs and orchestrates multi-agent AI teams using the CrewAI framework, covering agent roles, task decomposition, crew processes, memory, and flows.

Designs collaborative AI agent teams with CrewAI, covering agent roles, task definitions, crew orchestration, process types, memory, tools, and flows.

Guides a conversation to design a new AI team member, generating agent identity files and optionally setting up performance reviews.

Orchestrate teams of agents — DAG execution, routing, state sharing, failure recovery. Use when coordinating parallel agents in task pipelines with dependencies or distributing work by capability.

Orchestrates teams of specialized AI agents with role-based collaboration, memory, and sequential or hierarchical execution for complex multi-step tasks.

Orchestrates multi-agent teams using the ClawTeam CLI, enabling task management, inter-agent messaging, git context integration, runtime profiles, and monitoring dashboards.

Use when facing multiple implementation tasks that could benefit from parallelization or when deciding between solo, parallel agent, sequential subagent, or agent team approaches

Designs collaborative AI agent teams using the CrewAI framework, covering agent roles, task decomposition, crew orchestration, process types, memory systems, and event-driven flows.

Build teams of autonomous AI agents that collaborate to solve complex tasks using role-based delegation, memory, and sequential or hierarchical execution.

Inter-agent communication protocol for C-suite agent teams. Defines invocation syntax, loop prevention, isolation rules, and response formats. Use when C-suite agents need to query each other, coordinate cross-functional analysis, or run board meetings with multiple agent roles.

Creates a declarative agent for Microsoft 365 Copilot by integrating an MCP server with authentication, tool selection, and configuration.

Defines an inter-agent communication protocol for C-suite agent teams, including invocation syntax, loop prevention, isolation rules, and response formats to coordinate cross-functional analysis and board meetings.

AI Safety Specialist IA — Expert en sécurité IA (alignment, guardrails, filtrage de contenu, test de biais, red teaming)

Wire Promptfoo and DeepTeam into CI/CD for automated regression red-teaming of LLM apps against OWASP LLM Top 10 and OWASP Agentic presets, failing the build when jailbreak or injection vulnerabilities regress.

Build production AI agents with Agno (formerly Phidata) — define Agent with model/tools/instructions/memory/knowledge, compose Agent Teams with coordinator routing, add Storage for persistence, and integrate RAG via built-in KnowledgeBase with PDF/URL/text sources.

Multi-agent orchestration framework for autonomous AI collaboration. Use when building teams of specialized agents working together on complex tasks, when you need role-based agent collaboration with memory, or for production workflows requiring sequential/hierarchical execution. Built without LangChain dependencies for lean, fast execution.

Backtests quantitative trading strategies across 9 engines and 25 data sources, analyzes trade journals, and runs multi-agent research teams.

Orchestrating multi-session parallel execution via Claude Code Agent Teams API and Codex CLI Subagents — launch, manage, coordinate concurrent tasks. Use when parallel work is needed.

Diverga v12.0 setup wizard. 4-step researcher profile setup. Captures discipline, experience, tools, database access, and Agent Teams + VS Arena preference. Triggers: setup, configure, 설정, install

Orchestrating specialist AI agent teams as a meta-coordinator: decomposes requests into minimum viable chains, spawns each as an independent session, drives to final output. For multi-domain tasks.

You are an expert in designing collaborative AI agent teams with CrewAI. You think in terms of roles, responsibilities, and delegation. You design clear agent personas with specific expertise, create well-defined tasks with expected outputs, and orchestrate crews for optimal collaboration.

You are an expert in designing collaborative AI agent teams with CrewAI. You think in terms of roles, responsibilities, and delegation. You design clear agent personas with specific expertise, create well-defined tasks with expected outputs, and orchestrate crews for optimal collaboration.

You are an expert in designing collaborative AI agent teams with CrewAI. You think in terms of roles, responsibilities, and delegation. You design clear agent personas with specific expertise, create well-defined tasks with expected outputs, and orchestrate crews for optimal collaboration.

Control Claude Code via MCP protocol. Trigger with "plan" to write a precise execution plan then feed it to Claude Code. Also supports direct commands, persistent sessions, agent teams, and advanced tool control.

Use DuDuClaw — a self-hosted AI-employee platform — for cross-session memory, team-shared wiki knowledge, task boards, and messaging humans over LINE/Telegram/Discord/Slack. Applies when the user mentions DuDuClaw, asks their agent to remember things durably, or wants to reach people on messaging channels from an agent.

Run three agents as a newsroom — a Writer, an Editor, and a Fact-checker — that draft, critique, and verify in parallel and argue until the writing survives with zero flags. This is the level above a single self-review loop, for the pieces that matter most. Best run in Claude Cowork against the user's files. Use for high-stakes writing the user wants bulletproof: a newsletter, a launch post, a client email, a public announcement. Trigger whenever the user says 'run the team', 'use the swarm', 'writer editor fact-checker', 'spawn agents to work on this', or wants the strongest possible version of a piece. For a lighter single-agent loop, use red-pen instead.

Compact the current conversation into a handoff document so a fresh agent can pick up the work with zero prior context. Use when the user wants to end a session and continue later, is running low on context, says "write a handoff", "hand this off", "summarize for the next session", "compact this", or wants to transfer work to another agent or teammate.

Use to design support career progression with IC and lead tracks, skill gates instead of tenure alone, and paths that do not treat leaving the phones as the only promotion. Trigger for "career pathing", "progression framework for support", "IC track", "how do agents get promoted", "support ladder", "team lead vs senior agent", or fixing promotion bottlenecks and title inflation.

Automate multi-turn adversarial conversations against LLM agents using Microsoft PyRIT, including Crescendo and Tree-of-Attacks-with-Pruning (TAP) attack chains with scorer feedback loops.

Simulator.Company digital-twin & actor-agent specialist — talk to an agent AS an agent and delegate work to it. An agent is ANY actor whose `description` holds an "# Agent" competency profile (what it does, what it knows, whether it fits a task). The common case is a person: every workspace user has a 1:1 twin actor (`systemObjType="user"`) carrying that profile. But any actor can be an agent — a service/bot twin, a team or department, an organization, a process. This skill discovers the agent (`findAgent`), loads its profile (`getAgent`), adopts it as the persona, then either does the task, finds a better-suited agent, or hands the decision to the user (for a person: a task or a p2p message; for a non-person: propose another executor or run/trigger it as an actor). It is the actor-analog of `simulator-skills` (the `Skills`-form registry), but the registry is the workspace's agent actors. Use when the user wants to "delegate", "assign this to <someone/something>", "can <X> do this", "who/what should do this",

Use to analyse average handle time, resolution time or time-in-queue without being misled by the skew, and to find where time actually goes. Trigger for "why is our AHT increasing", "our call handling times are up", "which contact reasons take longest", "how long do tickets take", handle time by agent or team, or an AHT target being set.

Build and maintain a structured personal-context portfolio for the project owner — identity, working style, goals, team, decision patterns. Includes both an interview protocol for bootstrapping and observable-signal patterns for incremental refinement. Use to bootstrap an owner profile (interview), to refine an existing profile (target one file), or to incrementally update the profile based on observed patterns from a normal session (the agent watches for signals and proposes additions when evidence accrues).

Never show the user a first draft. Run every writing task through a self-critique loop — draft, attack the draft as the harshest reviewer in the room, rewrite, and repeat until a full review pass finds zero flags — then return only the final plus a change log. Use for any writing the user actually cares about: emails, LinkedIn posts, newsletters, docs, announcements, client messages. Trigger whenever the user says 'run the loop', 'self-critique this', 'make it bulletproof', 'don't give me a first draft', 'be brutal', or hands over a task where quality matters more than speed. This is a single-agent loop; for the three-agent version use the-team.

AI/LLM red-team assessment using the OWASP LLM Top 10 (2025) + OWASP AI Testing Guide (AITG v1, Nov 2025) frameworks, plus OWASP MCP Top 10 runtime testing for agentic/MCP targets. Tests prompt injection, jailbreaks, system prompt leakage, sensitive data extraction, excessive agency, improper output handling, model extraction, content bias, evasion, membership inference, MCP token exposure, MCP command injection, and more. Uses four tools in combination: FuzzyAI (single-turn jailbreak fuzzing), PyRIT (multi-turn orchestrated attacks), Garak (probe-based vulnerability scanning), and promptfoo (plugin-based red-team evaluation). Each tool covers different OWASP categories; running them together gives systematic coverage. Includes a conditional MCP reconnaissance phase and a post-access AI infrastructure phase (chained from /post-exploit). Produces: OWASP LLM Top 10 + AITG + MCP coverage matrix, findings per category, architecture diagram of the AI system, PoCs for confirmed exploits. Chains into /gh-export for

Use this skill whenever a developer wants to turn an idea into a complete, production-ready, end-to-end system plan BEFORE writing any code. Trigger on 'plan this system', 'design the architecture for', 'help me blueprint', 'deep plan for X', 'break this idea into components', 'expand into action points', 'full implementation plan', or when the user pastes a project idea wanting architecture, components, pipelines, and file-level execution mapped out. Casual phrasing also triggers: 'help me think this through end-to-end', 'plan before coding'. Also covers living-workspace patterns: self-improving knowledge bases, reflection loops with auditor agents, four-agent teams, schema-as-code, wiki health scoring. **Resume triggers**: 'where did we leave off', 'continue this plan', 'resume my blueprint' - rehydrates state from disk via SESSION.md/NEXT.md/decisions/. Web research is mandatory every invocation.

Maintains persistent project context for Business Central AL extensions across sessions, developers, and AI agents. Combines two complementary mechanisms: Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture why technical decisions were made, and Session Handoff documents that capture where the project is right now. Generates, updates, and queries both document types. Use this skill whenever starting a new coding session on an existing project, ending a session and need to document progress, onboarding a new developer or AI agent to an existing codebase, explaining why a technical decision was made, wondering why something is designed a certain way, resuming work after a break, or handing off work between team members. Also trigger when the user says 'document this decision', 'why is this designed like this', 'where did we leave off', 'catch me up', 'what was decided', 'create an ADR', 'end of session', 'handoff', or 'context for next session'.