Results for “descript”

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create an agent", "add an agent", "write a subagent", "agent frontmatter", "when to use description", "agent examples", "agent tools", "agent colors", "autonomous agent", or needs guidance on agent structure, system prompts, triggering conditions, or agent development best practices for Claude Code plugins.

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create an agent", "add an agent", "write a subagent", "agent frontmatter", "when to use description", "agent examples", "agent tools", "agent colors", "autonomous agent", or needs guidance on agent structure, system prompts, triggering conditions, or agent development best practices for Claude Code plugins.

Design and validate model-facing tool definitions with clear names, action-oriented descriptions, bounded JSON Schema parameters, explicit side effects, safe defaults, idempotency, errors, and realistic tests. Use when creating function-calling tools, MCP tools, agent actions, structured tool inputs, or when a model selects the wrong tool, invents arguments, or causes unsafe side effects.

Use when a bounded textual artifact (prompt, rubric, tool description, extraction instruction) keeps underperforming and success can be measured with an evaluator, dataset, or trace set. GEPA proposes evaluator-backed candidate rewrites through a normal PR/proposal adoption gate. Do not use for vague behavior changes, governance/persona/core-memory edits, fake metrics, or problems whose first honest task is defining the evaluator or collecting data.

Delegates a coding task to pi (dev/pi), a minimal terminal coding harness. This skill should be used when the user asks to "use pi", "run pi", "delegate to pi", "let pi handle this", "ask pi to", "have pi do", or invokes /pi:delegate. It bridges the current Claude Code context to the pi CLI, passing relevant files, git state, and the task description for execution by the pi-agent.

Design structured evaluation rubrics for scoring LLM and agent outputs — defining quality dimensions, scoring scales, hard gates, score descriptions, and edge cases. Load when the user asks to create an eval rubric, define evaluation criteria, design scoring dimensions, write an eval spec, or says "what should I evaluate", "design a rubric", "create eval criteria", "define quality dimensions", "evaluation rubric for", "how do I measure quality of". Sub-skill of eval-output orchestrator.

Reverse-lookup glossary that turns a vague description of a web animation or motion effect into its exact term ("the bouncy thing when a popover opens" → Pop in; "the iOS rubber-band scroll" → Rubber-banding). Use when the user asks "what's it called when…", or describes a motion effect without knowing its name and wants the right word to prompt an AI or designer with. For naming an effect, not designing or building one. Source: github.com/emilkowalski/skills.

When tackling a task that requires domain expertise beyond general coding ability — architecture patterns, framework-specific gotchas, deployment strategies, security anti-patterns, or specialized workflows — call the windags_skill_graft MCP tool with your task description. You'll receive expert knowledge including decision trees, failure modes, worked examples, and anti-patterns from a library of 503+ curated skills. Only graft when the task genuinely requires specialized knowledge. Simple tasks (rename a variable, fix a typo, format code) do not need grafting.

Builds a new Claude Code skill from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the skill's design tree decision-by-decision — entity fit, use cases, name, description, workflow steps, tools, and progressive-disclosure layout — then reviews the finished skill against the plugin-building guidance and applies every fix it finds. Use when creating, authoring, scaffolding, designing, or drafting a new skill or slash command. Does not build an agent or subagent — use agent-builder. Does not serve, vendor, or refresh the authoring guidance itself — use guidance.

Create cross-platform agent skills from workflow descriptions. Activates when users ask to create an agent, automate a repetitive workflow, create a custom skill, or need advanced agent creation. Triggers on phrases like create agent for, automate workflow, create skill for, every day I have to, daily I need to, turn process into agent, need to automate, create a cross-platform skill, validate this skill, export this skill, migrate this skill. Supports single skills, multi-agent suites, transcript processing, template-based creation, interactive configuration, cross-platform export, and spec validation.

Generates NeMo Guardrails Colang (.co) files and YAML config blocks from a plain-language description of a chatbot's purpose, allowed behaviors, and constraints. Use this skill whenever a user wants to build guardrails for a chatbot, define allowed intents for an LLM, create an AI firewall with NeMo Guardrails, generate Colang flow definitions, or configure a semantic allow-list for a bot. Trigger this skill even when the user just describes what their bot should and shouldn't do — generating the Colang and YAML is almost always what they need next.

Builds a new Claude Code agent (subagent) from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the agent's design tree decision-by-decision — entity fit, domain focus and vocabulary, role identity, anti-patterns, description, model tier, tools, and self-containment — then reviews the finished agent against the plugin-building guidance and applies every fix it finds. Use when creating, authoring, scaffolding, designing, or drafting a new agent or subagent. Does not build a skill or slash command — use skill-builder. Does not serve, vendor, or refresh the authoring guidance itself — use guidance.

Create, validate, and consume Google's Open Knowledge Format (OKF) bundles — YAML-frontmatter Markdown files with type / title / description / resource / tags / timestamp fields for portable, interoperable AI-agent knowledge sharing. OKF formalizes the LLM-Wiki pattern into a vendor-neutral open specification so any producer can write and any agent can consume without translation. Routes: use `llm-wiki` for raw source capture + vault maintenance, `obsidian` for Obsidian-vault workflows, `graphify` for durable committed graphs, `scrapling` for web-content extraction into OKF docs. Triggers on: okf, open knowledge format, knowledge bundle, okf document, llm wiki standard, knowledge atom, agent context format, okf frontmatter, okf bundle, knowledge interoperability.

Rewrite any prompt, instruction, task description, or spec into a "genie-proof" version — instructions so explicit, literal, and loophole-free that even a maliciously literal genie (or an LLM, contractor, or junior dev) could not misinterpret them. Use this skill whenever the user asks to genie-proof, tighten, harden, de-ambiguate, or "make bulletproof" a prompt or instruction; whenever they complain that an AI/model/person "didn't do what I meant," "took me too literally," or "found a loophole"; or whenever they hand over a vague prompt and ask to make it precise, explicit, unambiguous, or idiot-proof. Also trigger on phrases like "wish to a genie," "monkey's paw," "lawyer-proof this prompt," or "leave nothing to interpretation."

Update Han plugin documentation so every skill, agent, guidance doc, index, and cross-reference is current and accurate. On a non-default branch, scopes the pass to entities the branch actually touched. On the default branch, performs a full documentation sweep across the whole plugin. Use when updating, refreshing, syncing, auditing, or verifying Han's docs after changing skills, agents, references, or top-level guidance — including "update the docs", "doc sweep", "refresh documentation", "audit the docs", "make sure the docs are current". This is a repository-maintenance skill for the Han repo itself, not a general documentation skill — use /project-documentation to document features in arbitrary projects, /han-release to cut a release (and update CHANGELOG), and /update-pr-description for PR bodies.

Applies Han's shared Human-Readable Output Standard to a target you already have — a file on disk, text pasted into the prompt, or a draft already produced in the conversation — by dispatching the readability-editor to rewrite its prose so the main point comes first, headings are descriptive, each paragraph carries one idea, and sentences stay short and active, while preserving every fact. Use when you want to make a document or draft readable, edit or polish prose for readability, clean up writing, tighten wording, or re-apply the readability standard to something already written. Rewrites prose only, leaving code, diagrams, and citation identifiers unchanged. Does not write new feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not restructure code or review it — use refactor to restructure code and code-review to audit it. Does not judge the underlying work or raise findings; it only rewrites the writing.

Simulator.Company skill registry specialist — the data-driven analogue of these built-in skills. Use when the user wants to RUN a saved playbook ("run skill", "use the … skill", "/skill <slug>", "is there a skill for …", "what skills do I have"), or to AUTHOR one ("create a skill", "save this as a skill / playbook", "teach simulator to …", "make a reusable procedure"). A skill is an actor of the `Skills` system form whose `description` holds a step-by-step procedure (which MCP tools to call, with concrete entity ids) for a workspace-specific task such as "create a smart contract" or "onboard a client". Activate on: "run skill", "use playbook", "is there a skill for", "what skills do I have", "save as skill", "create a skill", "teach simulator", "запусти скіл", "використай скіл", "є скіл для", "які скіли є", "збережи як скіл", "створи скіл", "навчи simulator", "запусти навык", "используй навык", "сохрани как навык", "создай навык".

Turn any rough prompt, half-formed idea, or task description into a finished, ready-to-send prompt optimized for Opus 4.8 (with adaptive thinking) inside the chat app — claude.ai, the Mac app, the iOS app — NOT the API. Use this skill whenever the user wants to write, rewrite, optimize, improve, sharpen, or polish a prompt for the chat app. Trigger phrases include "rewrite this prompt", "make this a better prompt", "optimize this prompt", "turn this into a prompt", "help me prompt this", "draft a prompt that...", "I want to ask...", or whenever the user pastes a draft prompt and asks for improvements. Also trigger when the user describes a task they plan to send into the chat app and clearly wants a reusable, well-structured prompt rather than a direct answer. The output is always a single, copy-pasteable prompt in a code block that the user sends as-is — never a template with placeholders. When the request concerns the user's own work, the skill retrieves the real specifics first — memory, meeting transcript

Simulator.Company digital-twin & actor-agent specialist — talk to an agent AS an agent and delegate work to it. An agent is ANY actor whose `description` holds an "# Agent" competency profile (what it does, what it knows, whether it fits a task). The common case is a person: every workspace user has a 1:1 twin actor (`systemObjType="user"`) carrying that profile. But any actor can be an agent — a service/bot twin, a team or department, an organization, a process. This skill discovers the agent (`findAgent`), loads its profile (`getAgent`), adopts it as the persona, then either does the task, finds a better-suited agent, or hands the decision to the user (for a person: a task or a p2p message; for a non-person: propose another executor or run/trigger it as an actor). It is the actor-analog of `simulator-skills` (the `Skills`-form registry), but the registry is the workspace's agent actors. Use when the user wants to "delegate", "assign this to <someone/something>", "can <X> do this", "who/what should do this",