Results for “branch-review”

Runs external LLM code reviews (OpenAI Codex or Google Gemini CLI) on uncommitted changes, branch diffs, or specific commits.

针对 Modular RAG MCP Server 项目的老师式复习 Agent。按章节带领用户系统复习项目知识点，每道题互动问答、给出参考答案，复习结束后记录掌握进度，每次开始时回顾上次进度并建议继续或复习。Use when user says '复习项目', '帮我复习', '带我复习', '开始复习', '项目复习', 'review project', 'study review', '学习复习', '复盘', or wants to systematically review and study the project.

Analyze the available skill set and recommend candidate groups that could be consolidated into sub-skill bundles. Read-only — proposes a plan, does not move files.

Use `review-agent` for a high-risk Engineering Brief when a critical path, architecture boundary, material risk, or multiple downstream tasks need deeper design evidence. Skip ordinary work without those signals.

Rank a topic's user-flow branches by proof priority (value × risk × frequency) right after user-flow-map, ordering the branches, gating variation breadth, and promoting or pruning flows so state-model and ux-variations grow the tree in proof order — writes only existing flow-tree ordering fields, no schema change.

Handles git and GitHub operations using the gh CLI, triggered by any github.com URL. Covers creating and reviewing PRs, watching CI checks, interactive rebasing, branch cleanup, submodule management, and repository archaeology.

Launches four parallel read-only sub-agents to review a git diff or file scope for regressions, security risks, performance issues, and contract gaps, then aggregates findings into a prioritized fix path.

`analysis-agent`/`task-agent`/`review-agent`: use when code needs correctness, security, performance, maintainability, or hallucinated-API review; skip when no review is needed.

通用跨模型审查：Review LLM 对任意研究制品进行独立评审，输出结构化评分、wiki 实体映射与改进建议

Route local Git work into the safest next move: branch hygiene, selective staging, commit cleanup, merge-vs-rebase choice, conflict resolution, lease-safe pushes, and recovery from resets or bad history edits. Use when the user needs help preparing a branch, cleaning up commits, syncing with an updated base, resolving local Git conflicts, pushing rewritten history safely, recovering lost commits, or getting a diff ready for review. Not for hosted PR review, repo administration, or sprint planning.

针对 Modular RAG MCP Server 项目的老师式复习 Agent。按章节带领用户系统复习项目知识点，每道题互动问答、给出参考答案，复习结束后记录掌握进度，每次开始时回顾上次进度并建议继续或复习。Use when user says '复习项目', '帮我复习', '带我复习', '开始复习', '项目复习', 'review project', 'study review', '学习复习', '复盘', or wants to systematically review and study the project.

Turn a PR, diff, merge request, or patch stack into one evidence-first review brief with severity, missing-proof checks, and route-outs.

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch.

`analysis-agent`/`task-agent`/`review-agent`: use when logic, rules, invariants, branches, edges, or failure paths need isolated tests; skip without a unit-test decision.

Help address review/issue comments on the open GitHub PR for the current branch using gh CLI; verify gh auth first and prompt the user to authenticate if not logged in.

Run a standard Claude Code review of local git changes in this repository. Args: --wait, --background, --base <ref>, --scope <auto|working-tree|branch>, --model <model>, --effort <low|medium|high|xhigh|max>. Defaults to opus + xhigh effort. Use as the default path for ordinary code-review requests when the user did not explicitly ask for stronger adversarial scrutiny or for Claude to own the implementation work.