Results for “lead-qualification”

AI 原生的潜在客户情报和外联流水线。用 agent 驱动的信号评分、共同关系人排名、暖场路径发现、来源语音建模和多渠道外联（邮件、LinkedIn、X），替代 Apollo、Clay 和 ZoomInfo。在用户想找到、评估并联系高价值联系人时使用。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment.

選択肢(A/B/C)の深掘り比較→淘汰→推奨で判断負担を下げ判断の質を上げるスキル。5段階（L1固定3点/L1.5案拡張Diverge・自動/L2評価軸マトリクス/L3複数LLM弁証論/L4過去判断照合）。 「比較して」「深掘りして」「メリデメ教えて」「お勧めは？」「徹底的に」「過去の判断と照合」「前にどう決めたっけ」「/sentaku」等で発火。teian(浅)の深掘り要求を受け取り、brainstorming(深:設計全体)と棲み分け。

Provides production-grade techniques for evaluating LLM outputs using LLMs as judges, covering direct scoring, pairwise comparison, bias mitigation, rubric generation, and confidence calibration.

Design a lead routing and SLA model someone can actually implement. The assignment rules, the round-robin or account-based logic, the SLA timers, and the fallbacks when a rep is out or a lead has no owner. Built for B2B RevOps teams, customizable to your CRM and your team shape. Trigger on "design lead routing", "who should get this lead", "build our SLA", "round robin rules", "leads are falling through", or any routing diagnostic.

Agent profile for lead framework, dependency, database, SDK, and architecture migrations with sequencing and rollback. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.

Push the LLM to reconsider, refine, and improve its recent output. Use when user asks for deeper critique or mentions a known deeper critique method, e.g. socratic, first principles, pre-mortem, red team.

Provides a formal evaluation framework for Claude Code sessions, implementing eval-driven development (EDD) principles to define pass/fail criteria, measure reliability with pass@k metrics, and create regression test suites.

Formal evaluation framework for Claude Code sessions implementing eval-driven development (EDD) principles.

Sets up and audits the Claude Code harness for a project: CLAUDE.md, .claude/rules, skills, subagents, settings.json permissions, hooks, verification loop. Commands: kickoff (scaffold new setup), check-playbook (score an existing one), scouting-report (last scorecard), adjust (fix bloat/misplaced instructions), drill (turn advisory prose into real hooks/permissions/CI), decline (record an accepted risk), gameplan (work order with acceptance criteria before building), watch-film (check a diff against that order for scope creep/weakened tests/false claims). Use for setting up Claude Code, or on: "Claude ignores my CLAUDE.md", "it's huge and still misses things", "it said done but ran nothing", "it changed files I didn't ask about", "it weakened a test to pass", "rule, skill, or hook?", "is my setup any good". Not for code quality (code-audit), test coverage (test-assessment), one-off prompt wording (genie-proof-prompts), new skill authoring (skill-creator), or compacting a conversation (handoff).

Severity-tagged code review checklist (CRITICAL/HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW) used by code-critic agent