Results for “relevance-feedback”
12 skillsMore results
Retrieve First Gate
Before any explanation or answer, require the learner to produce a free-recall attempt and confidence rating. Use when a student wants help understanding or reviewing a topic — this skill ensures the AI works from what the learner already knows.
0
AI Feedback Design Principles
Audit and redesign AI-generated feedback for pedagogical quality, timing, and learning impact. Use when building or reviewing automated feedback in digital learning tools.
0
Message Queue Design
`task-agent`/`review-agent`: use when broker delivery, ordering, acknowledgement, DLQ, backpressure, or replay changes; skip synchronous retry without message semantics.
4 · bundle
Regression Testing
`analysis-agent`/`task-agent`/`review-agent`: use for recurrence guards on known defects, incidents, or escaped failures; skip speculative risk without a prior failure mechanism.
4 · bundle
Review
通用跨模型审查:Review LLM 对任意研究制品进行独立评审,输出结构化评分、wiki 实体映射与改进建议
77
Lead Intelligence
AI 原生的潜在客户情报和外联流水线。用 agent 驱动的信号评分、共同关系人排名、暖场路径发现、来源语音建模和多渠道外联(邮件、LinkedIn、X),替代 Apollo、Clay 和 ZoomInfo。在用户想找到、评估并联系高价值联系人时使用。
0 · bundle
Leverage And Response Design
Design a wise systems intervention from an existing analysis. Maps proposed actions against Meadows' leverage points, checks for unintended consequences, and generates alternatives.
0
Customer Feedback Triage
Triage customer feedback into themes, urgency, draft responses, and escalation notes.
0
Cache Design
Use with task-agent or review-agent for task-local cache scope, freshness, invalidation, and source-load risk. Do not use without a cache decision or as task owner.
4 · bundle
RAG Implementation
Build Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems for LLM applications with vector databases and semantic search. Use when implementing knowledge-grounded AI, building document Q&A systems, or integrating LLMs with external knowledge bases.
8 · bundle
Rebuttal
解析审稿意见 → 原子化 concerns (Rvx-Cy) → 映射到 wiki claims → 检查 evidence → Review LLM stress-test → 生成 rebuttal
77