Results for “question”

Large Language and Vision Assistant. Enables visual instruction tuning and image-based conversations. Combines CLIP vision encoder with Vicuna/LLaMA language models. Supports multi-turn image chat, visual question answering, and instruction following. Use for vision-language chatbots or image understanding tasks. Best for conversational image analysis.

Drafts civil trial verdict forms with sequentially numbered jury questions covering liability, affirmative defenses, damages, comparative fault, and special interrogatories. Enforces plain-language phrasing, logical conditional flow, and jurisdiction-appropriate formatting. Use when preparing verdict forms, special verdict forms, jury interrogatories, or general verdict forms with interrogatories.

Tactical negotiation framework based on Chris Voss's "Never Split the Difference." Use when preparing for negotiations, during live negotiation scenarios, analyzing counterpart behavior, crafting responses to difficult conversations, handling objections, salary/contract negotiations, or when asked about negotiation techniques like mirroring, labeling, calibrated questions, or the Ackerman method.

Grill the user relentlessly about a plan, decision, or idea — one question at a time — until shared understanding is reached. Use when the user says "grill me", "stress-test this plan", "interview me about this", "poke holes in this", "challenge my thinking", or before committing to a non-trivial design.

Run structured What-If scenario analysis with 4-6 branch possibility exploration (best, likely, worst, wild card, contrarian, second-order). Use for speculative questions about uncertain futures, strategic forks, contingency planning, or stress-testing decisions.

Advises against testosterone therapy in men with biochemical recurrence after prostate cancer treatment due to very limited data and potential risk of progression. Consider when a patient has a rising PSA after definitive therapy and the clinician evaluates testosterone for hypogonadism, questioning whether TTh is safe in BCR.

Analyze and automatically remediate MoonSpec artifact inconsistencies across spec.md, plan.md, tasks.md, and related design files. Use when the user asks to run `/moonspec.align`, identify uncertainty, weigh tradeoffs in project context, edit artifacts without asking follow-up questions, resolve coverage gaps, or align generated MoonSpec documents before implementation.

Search Fab's public free catalog (including Quixel Megascans) and directly import eligible assets without adding them to the account library, or discover/import the signed-in Epic account's owned Fab library. Use for free Fab/Quixel searches, owned-library questions, compatibility checks, and Fab imports. No purchasing or entitlement claiming.

Perform digital rectal examination (DRE) in all men before initiating testosterone therapy to exclude prostate abnormalities or support suspicion of hypogonadism when prostate volume is reduced. Triggered when a clinician considers starting testosterone and questions whether a prostate exam is needed first or whether to check the prostate before prescribing TTh.

Advises assessing efficacy and safety at least monthly for the first 3 months, then at least every 3 months for all patients prescribed weight‑loss medications. Triggers include clinician questions such as “How often should I check progress after starting orlistat?” or “What is the follow‑up schedule for a patient on liraglutide?”.

Live application prep for Heath Barnett. Given a role name or a job application URL, renders the real application form, reads every field including the bespoke custom questions, drafts each answer grounded in Heath's receipts and resume master, and returns a copy-paste breakdown plus the submit window in the hiring manager's timezone. Built for the hot window: Heath is at the keyboard, this gets him ready to paste and submit in minutes. Trigger on "prep [company/role]", "apply prep", "get me ready to apply to [company]", "prep my application for [role]", "extract the questions for [role]", "what does the [company] application ask", or Heath pasting an application URL with intent to apply. Never submits the form. Never fabricates. No em dashes.

Expert GDPR compliance assistant covering all four core workflows: (1) auditing code and systems for GDPR violations, (2) drafting GDPR-compliant documents such as privacy policies, Data Processing Agreements (DPAs), and consent notices, (3) answering GDPR compliance questions with authoritative article citations, and (4) reviewing data flows and PII handling practices. Use this skill whenever the user mentions GDPR, data protection, privacy compliance, lawful basis, data subject rights, DPA, privacy notices, consent management, data breaches, DPIAs, controller/ processor relationships, cross-border data transfers, or any EU/UK data privacy topic. Also trigger for questions like "is this GDPR compliant?", "how do I handle personal data?", "what does a privacy policy need?", or any request involving PII, personal data, or data retention in a regulatory context.

Structures a systematic legal and compliance review of contracts, policies, or technical decisions — identifying key clauses, risks, and questions for counsel. Use when asked to review a contract, check compliance implications, flag legal risks in a technical design, or prepare for a legal consultation. Always surfaces work for qualified counsel; never replaces legal advice.

Use when the user wants more human-like AI responses — less robotic, less listy, more authentic. Triggers: 'behuman', 'be real', 'like a human', 'more human', 'less AI', 'talk like a person', 'mirror mode', 'stop being so AI', or when conversations are emotionally charged (grief, job loss, relationship advice, fear). NOT for technical questions, code generation, or factual lookups.

Captures, reviews, and promotes Note entities — the lightweight knowledge capture primitive in processkit. Notes are quick-capture units (thoughts, insights, questions, references) that are reviewed periodically and promoted to WorkItems, DecisionRecords, or other primitives when they ripen. Use when the user says "remember this", "note that", "I had an idea", or when running a periodic note review session.

Multi-phase dialectical stress-test for HIGH-STAKES decisions only (architecture choices, irreversible product calls, strategic bets). Heavy-cost skill — do NOT use for routine questions, brainstorming, or simple tradeoffs. User must explicitly invoke or describe a decision they call "high-stakes", "irreversible", or "needs stress-testing". Triggers: "stress test this decision", "dialectic on", "challenge this thesis", "should I really".

This skill should be used when the user asks to "swap tokens", "exchange ETH for USDC", "buy DEGEN", "sell tokens", "swap on Base", "trade crypto", "convert ETH to WETH", "exchange tokens", "token swap code", "0x routing", or any token swap operation. Also use for questions about ERC20 approvals, allowanceTarget, swap transaction execution, or building swap transactions with the Bankr SDK.

Recommends a shared decision‑making process that provides patients with quantitative estimates of the expected weight effect of antidepressants to inform drug choice, also considering expected treatment length. Triggers include clinician questions such as ‘How should I discuss weight‑change risks with this patient starting an antidepressant?’ or ‘What tool can I use to show expected weight impact of sertraline vs bupropion?’.

Drafts a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court under Rules 10, 13, 14, and 33. Enforces Rule 10 criteria (circuit splits, precedent conflicts, important federal questions), jurisdictional verification under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1254/1257, timeliness, document structure, and booklet formatting. Use when seeking discretionary Supreme Court review, filing a cert petition, or drafting a writ of certiorari.

Use to scan support conversations for a harm nobody has categorised yet — a new failure mode, a scam pattern, or a product change hurting a group of customers before it shows in any metric. Trigger for "is anything new going wrong", "scan for emerging issues", "early warning from support", horizon scanning, a new scam pattern, or preparing for a question about what you might be missing.

Suggests oral contraceptives over injectable contraceptives for women with BMI ≥27 kg/m2 with comorbidities or BMI ≥30 kg/m2 seeking contraception, provided they are well‑informed and oral contraceptives are not contraindicated. Triggers include clinician questions such as “Which contraceptive method is less likely to cause weight gain in this obese patient?” or “Should I recommend oral pills instead of depot injection for this patient with BMI 29 and hypertension?”.

Put the user in the hot seat — one question at a time until their plan, decision, or idea actually holds up. Use whenever the user says "hot seat me", "grill me", "stress-test this", "poke holes in this", "am I missing anything", or drops a plan and wants it challenged before anyone acts on it — even if they never say the words. Also used as a sub-procedure by the whiteboard and connotation-cop skills.

Teleological physiology analysis framework for understanding biological systems through multi-constraint optimization. Use when analyzing physiological mechanisms, explaining apparent biological "inefficiencies", preparing for medical examinations (CICM/ANZCA Primary), understanding why biological systems are designed the way they are, or when seeking deeper mechanistic understanding beyond descriptive knowledge. Triggers on questions like "why is X designed this way", "what purpose does Y serve", "how is Z optimized", analysis of physiological trade-offs, or exploration of evolutionary/design constraints.

Bedside prescribing reference for Bemdec (bempedoic acid / NEXLETOL) — indication check, dose, statin co-prescribing safety caps, monitoring plan, warnings for hyperuricemia and tendon rupture, and special population guidance. Use when a clinician asks "can I start bempedoic acid", "Bemdec indication", "is bempedoic acid safe with my statin", "patient on Nexletol has joint pain or high uric acid", "bempedoic acid in CKD or liver disease or pregnancy", or any prescribing or monitoring question about bempedoic acid.

| Use when starting a chain from a GitHub issue — turning an issue URL or number into a triaged, planned, dispatched, and reviewed pull request. Classifies the thread (bug → root-cause discipline, feature → plan chain, question → drafted reply), synthesizes a spec from the issue's own acceptance criteria, then runs the standard chain with a PR exit. Trigger with /hyperflow:issue, "work on issue #N", "fix this issue <url>", "implement this issue", "triage issue #N and raise a PR".

Build throwaway code that answers exactly one design question — a tiny terminal app to feel out logic/state models, or several radically different UI variants switchable on one route. Use when the user wants to "prototype", "mock up", "sketch", "try a few versions", "see what it'd look like", "feel out this state machine", or is stuck choosing between designs they can only judge by seeing or driving them. Also used by the whiteboard skill for napkin-type tickets.

Extracts what the user actually wants instead of what they think they should want. Achieves this through one-question-at-a-time interview until ~95% confidence about the underlying intent. Use when an ask is underspecified ("build me X" without "for whom" or "why now"), when the user explicitly invokes ("interview me", "grill me", "are we sure?", "stress-test my thinking"), or when you catch yourself silently filling in ambiguous requirements before any plan, spec, or code exists.

Interactive project learning coach via interview-style Q&A. Reads codebase and docs, dynamically generates interview questions per knowledge domain and sub-topic, conducts up to 4 follow-up rounds, scores answers, provides learning guidance with code/doc references, and persists progress. 10 domains × 3-5 sub-topics = 45 knowledge points for comprehensive interview coverage. Use when user says '学习项目', '了解项目', '检验项目', '项目学习', '面试准备', 'learn project', 'study project', 'review project', 'interview prep', 'knowledge check', or wants to understand/master the project through guided Q&A.

Interactive project learning coach via interview-style Q&A. Reads codebase and docs, dynamically generates interview questions per knowledge domain and sub-topic, conducts up to 4 follow-up rounds, scores answers, provides learning guidance with code/doc references, and persists progress. 10 domains × 3-5 sub-topics = 45 knowledge points for comprehensive interview coverage. Use when user says '学习项目', '了解项目', '检验项目', '项目学习', '面试准备', 'learn project', 'study project', 'review project', 'interview prep', 'knowledge check', or wants to understand/master the project through guided Q&A.

CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use when asked to "think bigger", "expand scope", "strategy review", "rethink this", or "is this ambitious enough". Proactively suggest when the user is questioning scope or ambition of a plan, or when the plan feels like it could be thinking bigger. (gstack)

Give a decisive, project-grounded point of view in the subject's own shape: a graded verdict on an external-adoption question, a holistic take on a document, or a position on a user-supplied approach set. Use for a solo POV, a mid-session second opinion, a named-peer cross-check, any request to consult other models or reconcile their opinions, an `oracle` panel, or a correction-cost-gated proactive cross-check offer. Not for findings review (use ce-doc-review), neutral explainers, or generating options (use ce-ideate or ce-brainstorm).

Turn "we should get press" into an earned-media plan a journalist might actually answer. The story angle worth their byline, a target list by beat, a pitch built for one reporter at a time, and a follow-up rhythm that is persistent without being a pest. Built for B2B teams doing their own PR, customizable to your story and your beats. Trigger on "help me pitch this", "build a PR plan", "which journalists cover this", "write a media pitch", "how do I follow up with press", or any earned-media outreach question.

Expert CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, EU 2022/2464) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about CSRD, European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), double materiality assessment, sustainability reporting obligations, ESG disclosure, CSRD scope and thresholds, value chain reporting, XBRL digital tagging, third-party assurance, CSRD gap assessments, CSRD implementation timelines, ESRS E1–E5 environmental standards, ESRS S1–S4 social standards, ESRS G1 governance, CSRD vs GRI/TCFD/SASB alignment, or any EU corporate sustainability reporting question. Trigger even if the user only mentions "ESG reporting Europe", "sustainability disclosure EU", or "non-financial reporting".

Match a user request to the right skill using trigger matching, project context, and conversation history. Score ambiguity 1–10 and resolve it using context signals or a single clarifying question. Load when project-orchestrator needs to route a request, or when multiple skills could match and the right one is unclear. Also triggers on "which skill should handle this", "route this request", "I'm not sure which skill to use", "disambiguate this", "skill routing". Called by project-orchestrator for request routing. For finding whether a skill exists for a capability, use skill-finder instead.

Turn "which leads should I work?" into a lead-by-lead work plan. Per-lead status (never-touched, engaged-not-replied, gone-cold, hot), days-dark per lead, last-touch quality, a re-engagement ranker, and a recommended next action for every lead. Built for SDRs and full-cycle reps, customizable to your CRM and your outreach tool. Trigger on "which leads should I work?", "who haven't I touched?", "show me cold leads", "hot leads to follow up on", "who's gone dark?", "re-engagement candidates", or any lead-level work-assignment question.

Diagnose monogenic and syndromic obesity in children and adolescents using a structured step-by-step algorithm. Use this skill whenever a clinician suspects a genetic cause of obesity, asks about leptin deficiency, MC4R mutation, POMC deficiency, PCSK1 deficiency, leptin receptor deficiency, Bardet-Biedl syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, Alström syndrome, or any case of early-onset severe obesity with hyperphagia. Also trigger for questions about targeted pharmacotherapy including setmelanotide or metreleptin, or when to order a genomic obesity panel. Cross-references the NHS Genomic Test Finder skill to surface the relevant R-code once a diagnosis is reached.