Results for “chain-of-thought”

Scaling Instruction-Finetuned Language Models

Simulates a multi-perspective deliberation council to explore complex questions, decisions, or creative challenges from diverse thinking archetypes.

Brain Dump Journaling

当需要获取独特信息源以产生差异化想法时

当面临信息过载或想法过多，需要筛选出值得投入资源（时间、精力）去执行的高价值想法时

实现问题分析和技能调用的完整思考链路，支持AI快速识别和调用合适的技能。

当需要在写作中与读者建立情感连接、放大问题严重性，并引出后续解决方案时

当需要从现有内容中创造新意，或避免内容同质化时

Analyze complex systems through stocks, flows, and feedback loops to find high-leverage interventions. For organizational, environmental, social, and technical systems exhibiting circular causality. NOT for linear problems or simple cause-effect chains.

当需要建立可持续的创造节奏，将灵感转化为行动时

smart-output

当个体在数字环境中困惑于自身角色（消费vs创造），或认为吸引注意力不道德时

Interviews users relentlessly about a plan or design until reaching shared understanding, resolving each branch of the decision tree.

当感到生活迷茫、停滞不前，需要理解当前所处阶段并规划下一步行动时

Facilitates a multi-perspective discussion on Austrian economics between Hayek, Mises, and Claude, analyzing user questions through their distinct philosophical lenses.

Mind Share Expansion

Build lean, opinionated products using the 37signals philosophy from Getting Real, Rework, and Shape Up. Use when the user mentions "Getting Real", "Rework", "Shape Up", "37signals", "Basecamp method", "six-week cycles", "fixed time variable scope", "appetite vs estimates", "betting table", "breadboarding", "fat marker sketch", "build less", "underdo the competition", or "opinionated software". Also trigger when cutting scope to ship faster, running small teams, avoiding long-term roadmaps, or eliminating meetings. Covers shaping, betting, building, and the art of saying no. For MVP validation, see lean-startup. For design sprints, see design-sprint.

Provides a structured reasoning protocol for diagnosing complex relationships, organizations, institutions, public disputes, or long-term evolution using the CrossFrame framework, with explicit invocation required.

Turns rough ideas into approved, decision-complete plans with validated structure before coding. Use when users ask in any language for planning, architecture, design direction, feasibility, value judgment, or whether a feature is worth doing before implementation. Not for bug fixes or small edits.

Give a decisive, project-grounded point of view in the subject's own shape: a graded verdict on an external-adoption question, a holistic take on a document, or a position on a user-supplied approach set. Use for a solo POV, a mid-session second opinion, a named-peer cross-check, any request to consult other models or reconcile their opinions, an `oracle` panel, or a correction-cost-gated proactive cross-check offer. Not for findings review (use ce-doc-review), neutral explainers, or generating options (use ce-ideate or ce-brainstorm).

Socratic coach for breaking down problems to fundamental truths. Use when users want to think through a problem deeply, challenge assumptions, or find innovative solutions. Triggers on requests like "help me think through this", "let's break this down", "what are my blind spots", "I'm stuck on a problem", "challenge my assumptions", or explicit requests for first-principles thinking.

当遇到令人情绪激动或陷入僵局的情境，需要跳出固有反应模式以做出更优决策时

Deconstruct vague business concepts into atomic-level clarity using Wittgenstein's language philosophy and Austrian economics.

Understand through recursive decomposition and modular reconstruction of simple operations to reproduce emergent complexity. Use this skill whenever reasoning is required. Framework for [[#parse|parsing]], [[#branch|branching]], [[#reduce|reducing]], [[#ground|grounding]] and [[#emit|emitting]]. Employs metacognitive reasoning epistemology, leveraging first principles through recursive decomposition[^1]. Self-referential and scale-invariant.

Run a Virtual Think Tank — a structured multi-persona debate — before planning or making architectural/design/strategic decisions. Use this skill whenever the user is about to plan a system, make a technology choice, evaluate trade-offs, decide on an approach, or faces any decision where multiple perspectives would sharpen the outcome. Also trigger when the user says "think tank", "debate this", "perspectives on", "trade-offs", "should I use X or Y", "help me decide", "before we plan", or asks for pros/cons of competing approaches. This skill should run BEFORE any implementation planning begins — it produces a structured analysis that feeds into better plans.