Results for “editorial-decision”

Clinical copy-editor that reviews text for communication issues. Use when user says review for prose or improve the prose

Clinical copy-editor that reviews text for communication issues. Use when user says review for prose or improve the prose

Decide

Give a decisive, project-grounded point of view in the subject's own shape: a graded verdict on an external-adoption question, a holistic take on a document, or a position on a user-supplied approach set. Use for a solo POV, a mid-session second opinion, a named-peer cross-check, any request to consult other models or reconcile their opinions, an `oracle` panel, or a correction-cost-gated proactive cross-check offer. Not for findings review (use ce-doc-review), neutral explainers, or generating options (use ce-ideate or ce-brainstorm).

Use after Cell reviews arrive to triage the decision, prioritize the (often substantial) new experiments by impact × feasibility, and draft a point-by-point response that is respectful, evidence-led, and closes the "completeness" gaps reviewers demand. Do not run before the experiments and revision are actually done.

Record a decision: finalized → ADR (optionally rule + guide or spec + plan); open proposal → RFC. Use for 'we decided', 'record this decision', 'make it a standard', 'draft an RFC', 'should we switch to Y'. Not for feature planning or documenting existing code.

Use after NEJM reviews arrive — often including a dedicated statistical reviewer and an editor letter — to triage the decision, answer statistical comments rigorously, and draft a point-by-point response that quotes each comment, the response, and the revised manuscript text. Do not run before the main text is actually revised.

Decide whether an article deserves publication through hard checks and skeptical comparison.

Clinical copy-editor that reviews text for communication issues. Use when user says review for prose or improve the prose

Record durable project decisions with rationale, alternatives, assumptions, status, and revisit triggers. Load when the user says record this decision, we decided, decision log, why did we choose, revisit this later, or capture architectural/process rationale.

Decide

Use after PNAS reviews arrive to triage the decision, prioritize experiments, and draft a point-by-point response that is respectful, evidence-led, and honest about limits. Do not run before the main text is actually revised.

Structure a hard business decision — frame the choice, score options against weighted criteria, run a pre-mortem and stress-test, and produce a recommendation + decision record for any active brand

Analyze content sequences from page structure to determine whether each should be default content or a specific block, and validate block selection for AEM Edge Delivery Services imports.

Write a rigorous, decision-grade experiment spec — falsifiable hypothesis, primary metric, guardrails, randomisation unit, exposure definition, method (A/B, holdout, switchback, quasi-experiment, MAB), MDE/duration plan, peek policy, validity threats, and pre-committed decision rule. Platform-agnostic. Load when the user has a candidate experiment and needs to spec it before launch, or says "spec this experiment", "write the test plan", "design this A/B test", "what's the hypothesis", "how big a sample do we need", "how long should we run this", "define the metrics for this test", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.

Activate when the user is drafting any academic economics content from scratch (e.g., outlines, abstracts, introductions, data/methods/identification sections, results narratives, conclusions, referee responses, table/figure captions) and needs economics-specific structure, phrasing options, and quality checks to produce publication-ready prose.

Design, prioritize, and evaluate product experiments with clear hypotheses and defensible decisions, including A/B testing, sample size estimation, and statistical interpretation.

Structural editor that proposes cuts, reorganization, and simplification while preserving comprehension. Use when user requests structural review or editorial review of structure

Use when drafting or revising the body sections of an AER, AER:Insights, or AEJ manuscript — institutional background, data, empirical strategy, results, mechanisms, and conclusion. Covers equation conventions, results-paragraph narration, magnitude interpretation, and back-of-envelope policy calculations. Apply after the empirics are stable and before or alongside aer-introduction.

Write clear design rationale that connects decisions to user needs, business goals, and principles.

Police the project's vocabulary — bust vague terms, keep the CONTEXT.md glossary sharp, and lock in decisions worth remembering as ADRs. Use when the user debates naming, says "what should we call this", asks to pin down terminology, wants a decision recorded, or when another skill (hot-seat, whiteboard) surfaces a decision that clears the ADR bar. Just reading the glossary for vocabulary is NOT this skill — trigger only when the words or decisions are being changed.

Creates editorial-minimalist web prototypes with warm monochrome canvas, serif display and grotesque body typography, hairline borders, and ambient micro-motion.

Condenses complex materials into a one-page executive decision memo with recommendation, evidence, tradeoffs, and next actions.

Transform a concept into an editorial-style visual narrative with six distinct layouts, four font families, and a magazine-like arc from problem to insight.

Check post-launch adoption for a published ORD package and recommend iterate, graduate, or archive

严格细致判断与评分故事文本，从市场潜力、创新属性、内容亮点维度分析质量。适用于小说初筛选、多维度评估打分

Structural editor that proposes cuts, reorganization, and simplification while preserving comprehension. Use when user requests structural review or editorial review of structure

Navigate moral reasoning from personal dilemmas to academic philosophy.

Use when blending editorial magazine composition with precision product-tech detailing — asymmetrical grids, cinematic media bands, mono utility labels, and restrained accent color. Prefer this over mengto-agency-grid-layout-minimal when tech/product detailing and media bands matter as much as the editorial grid.

Recommends a shared decision‑making process that provides patients with quantitative estimates of the expected weight effect of antidepressants to inform drug choice, also considering expected treatment length. Triggers include clinician questions such as ‘How should I discuss weight‑change risks with this patient starting an antidepressant?’ or ‘What tool can I use to show expected weight impact of sertraline vs bupropion?’.

Transforms A/B test and product experiment data into actionable readouts with hypothesis, metrics, interpretation, and decision.

Structural editor that proposes cuts, reorganization, and simplification while preserving comprehension. Use when user requests structural review or editorial review of structure

Reconcile canonical declarative documents under docs/ with verified implementation discoveries after a FULLY_IMPLEMENTED moonspec-verify verdict. Use when an orchestration run must decide whether verified discoveries show the owning canonical document is impossible, unclear, or inconsistent, apply the smallest correct doc update, or escalate ambiguous authority conflicts and deliberate divergences instead of editing.