Results for “executive-deliberation”

Condenses complex materials into a one-page executive decision memo with recommendation, evidence, tradeoffs, and next actions.

Decide

Write executive-ready product updates with signal, tradeoffs, risks, and recommendations.

This skill guides clinicians in sharing decision‑making when selecting an antiepileptic drug (AED) by providing quantitative estimates of each drug’s expected weight effect. It is triggered when a clinician asks how to discuss weight‑change risks when choosing an AED or what information to provide on weight effects of specific agents such as valproate versus lamotrigine.

Execute

Decide

Be the CEO with strategic planning, board management, investor relations, financial modeling, crisis navigation, and executive decision-making.

Freeze

Record a decision: finalized → ADR (optionally rule + guide or spec + plan); open proposal → RFC. Use for 'we decided', 'record this decision', 'make it a standard', 'draft an RFC', 'should we switch to Y'. Not for feature planning or documenting existing code.

Execute the next incomplete step (or full phase with --phase), ship the result, and prepare the next step

Autonomous evolutionary code improvement engine with tournament selection

Structure the first 90 days of a VP or CPO transition as a diagnostic process, not an execution sprint, using a three-phase playbook to build evidence before making decisions.

Drafts formal responses to governmental Notices of Violation, covering acknowledgment, factual timeline, legal defenses, mitigation, and proposed corrective action. Use when responding to environmental enforcement actions, regulatory citations, compliance violations, or governmental NOVs from agencies including EPA, OSHA, state environmental departments, or local code enforcement.

Requer medidas executivas atipicas com base no poder geral de efetivacao (CPC 139 IV — o juiz determina TODAS as medidas indutivas, coercitivas, mandamentais ou sub-rogatorias necessarias para assegurar o cumprimento, inclusive nas acoes de prestacao pecuniaria), sistematizadas pela tutela especifica das obrigacoes de fazer/nao fazer (CPC 536-537), com limites de proporcionalidade, contraditorio, fundamentacao concreta e subsidiariedade (so apos esgotar os meios tipicos). Use quando o operador disser medidas atipicas, art. 139 IV, suspender CNH do devedor, apreender passaporte, medidas coercitivas execucao, devedor contumaz.

Write a rigorous, decision-grade experiment spec — falsifiable hypothesis, primary metric, guardrails, randomisation unit, exposure definition, method (A/B, holdout, switchback, quasi-experiment, MAB), MDE/duration plan, peek policy, validity threats, and pre-committed decision rule. Platform-agnostic. Load when the user has a candidate experiment and needs to spec it before launch, or says "spec this experiment", "write the test plan", "design this A/B test", "what's the hypothesis", "how big a sample do we need", "how long should we run this", "define the metrics for this test", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.

Brief

Hard Call

CEO/founder-mode plan review. (gstack)

Give a decisive, project-grounded point of view in the subject's own shape: a graded verdict on an external-adoption question, a holistic take on a document, or a position on a user-supplied approach set. Use for a solo POV, a mid-session second opinion, a named-peer cross-check, any request to consult other models or reconcile their opinions, an `oracle` panel, or a correction-cost-gated proactive cross-check offer. Not for findings review (use ce-doc-review), neutral explainers, or generating options (use ce-ideate or ce-brainstorm).

Council

CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use when asked to "think bigger", "expand scope", "strategy review", "rethink this", or "is this ambitious enough". Proactively suggest when the user is questioning scope or ambition of a plan, or when the plan feels like it could be thinking bigger. (gstack)

Recommends a shared decision‑making process that provides patients with quantitative estimates of the expected weight effect of antidepressants to inform drug choice, also considering expected treatment length. Triggers include clinician questions such as ‘How should I discuss weight‑change risks with this patient starting an antidepressant?’ or ‘What tool can I use to show expected weight impact of sertraline vs bupropion?’.

Structure a hard business decision — frame the choice, score options against weighted criteria, run a pre-mortem and stress-test, and produce a recommendation + decision record for any active brand

Outcome Eval

Freeze

Epic Generation