Results for “plan-review”

Compare, cross-review, and merge competing plans from multiple agents into one executable direction with a clear handoff.

Iterates through pending development plans in .cursor/plans, implementing tasks, running self-tests, reviewing code, committing locally, and moving completed plans to docs/plans/done.

Loads an implementation plan, executes tasks in batches with verification, and reports progress for review between batches.

Execute implementation plans by dispatching a fresh subagent per task, with task review after each and a whole-branch review at the end.

Sharpens and stress-tests an existing plan file through multiple codebase-grounded review passes, editing it in place and recording every finding and iteration in cross-referenced companion files. Use this skill whenever the user wants to iterate on, refine, tighten, or improve a plan. Also use it when the user asks to verify, validate, or confirm feasibility of an approach. Does not implement plan steps, write test plans, review code, or investigate bugs, and does not generate new plans from scratch — use plan-a-feature for a new plan. Runs its review rounds to completion without pausing between them; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

Executes a written implementation plan task-by-task with verification, review checkpoints, and sub-skill handoffs.

Executes a written implementation plan in batches, pausing between batches for review and feedback.

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

Use when all plan tasks are done and green to review, archive planning artifacts, and ask how to finish.

Use when all plan tasks are done and green to review, archive planning artifacts, and ask how to finish.

Build a compact, validation-gated implementation plan for multi-step, risky, or ambiguous work — typically when phases need explicit checkpoints, the change touches multiple files/services, or the user wants alignment before execution. Output goes to `.claude/plans/<topic>.md` (or `.agents/plans/`) with goal, in/out-of-scope, phased steps, validation per phase, and replanning triggers. Skip for trivial single-file fixes, bug investigations (use `tracer`), or open-ended exploration (use `explore`). Pair with `ship` once the plan ends and merge work begins.

Deprecated standalone review skill

Comprehensive code review using specialized agents — orchestrates code, comments, tests, errors, types, and simplify agents sequentially.

CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use when asked to "think bigger", "expand scope", "strategy review", "rethink this", or "is this ambitious enough". Proactively suggest when the user is questioning scope or ambition of a plan, or when the plan feels like it could be thinking bigger. (gstack)

Runs a multi-perspective review of a pull request, including code quality, tests, and potential silent failures, then reports findings ranked by severity.

Use this skill for code review and PR review tasks. Covers review methodology, what to flag, what to skip, and output structure.

Build a personalized study plan with spaced-repetition scheduling toward a deadline and goal.

Review an entire codebase for architecture, engineering health, and exploitable risk; generate a prioritized remediation plan, an evidence-anchored system knowledge document, or both.

Design grading plans. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with grading-plan related tasks.

Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md. Identifying inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items.

Alias for $plan --consensus

Runs a structured code review as a pre-commit or pre-ship gate, supporting multiple review engines and scope governance.

Use when you have a written implementation plan to execute in a separate session with review checkpoints

Plan before implementing - understand scope and approach with detailed guidance

Analyzes evaluation patterns across completed plans and evolves the superpowers checklists accordingly.

Conduct a thorough project-wide code review as an expert panel, cross-referencing specs, changelogs, and design documents

Analyze auto-memory for promotion candidates, stale entries, consolidation opportunities, and health metrics. Use when the user runs /si:review or asks what has been learned and what should be promoted or pruned.