Results for “research-evaluation”

Scholar Evaluation

Evaluate scientific manuscripts and grant proposals with structured, checklist-based peer review covering methodology, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, and reporting standards.

Systematic peer review toolkit. Evaluate methodology, statistics, design, reproducibility, ethics, figure integrity, reporting standards, for manuscript and grant review across disciplines.

Eng manager-mode plan review. (gstack)

Design, prioritize, and evaluate product experiments with clear hypotheses and defensible decisions, including A/B testing, sample size estimation, and statistical interpretation.

将一篇经管实证论文摄取为实证研究 wiki：论文卡片 + 变量 + 数据 + 模型 + 机制 + 识别 + 稳健性 + 异质性 + 表格线索

Simulates a NeurIPS/SC/ICSE-style peer review with five reviewer personas (HPC, ML, Stats, Reproducibility, Devil's Advocate) that verify every claim against actual result data before submission.

Design and implement evaluation harnesses for models, agents, and code. Use when creating benchmarks, designing eval metrics, or comparing system outputs.

基于已摄取文献和本地数据，生成经管实证研究设计：问题、机制、变量、模型、识别、机制、异质性、稳健性

Use when assessing new ideas, technologies, or approaches before committing resources to them. This skill provides a framework for evaluating innovation opportunities systematically, separating genuine breakthroughs from hype.

Transforms A/B test and product experiment data into actionable readouts with hypothesis, metrics, interpretation, and decision.

Eng manager-mode plan review. Lock in the execution plan — architecture, data flow, diagrams, edge cases, test coverage, performance. Walks through issues interactively with opinionated recommendations. Use when asked to "review the architecture", "engineering review", or "lock in the plan". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan or design doc and is about to start coding — to catch architecture issues before implementation. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "tech review", "technical review", "plan engineering review".