Results for “paper-writing”

Automatically write empirical sections of academic papers in LaTeX by reading tables/figures from a PDF. Trigger when user wants to write a paper from empirical results, has tables/figures in PDF, or says "write paper" / "paper-writer" / "写论文".

基于论文文本的通用读论文助手。用户提供论文文本（文件路径或直接粘贴），解答各类读论文需求——总结、精读、内容问答、概念解释、批判性分析等，并将结果以 Markdown 写入当前工作目录。触发词：读论文、论文总结、精读这篇论文、帮我分析这篇论文、这篇论文讲了什么、论文问答、论文笔记。输入为纯文本/Markdown 论文内容；不做论文检索下载、不做扫描件 OCR、不做论文写作降重。

Produces academic papers, literature reviews, grant proposals, and clinical reports with LaTeX formatting and verified citations, using research-lookup and parallel-web skills.

Write long-form content such as blog posts, guides, tutorials, and newsletters with a distinctive voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance, ensuring structure, pacing, and credibility.

Produces high-quality written knowledge artifacts such as READMEs, guides, API specs, tutorials, runbooks, and wikis, with audience-appropriate structure and accuracy.

Write scientific manuscripts in full paragraphs using IMRAD structure, with citations (APA/AMA/Vancouver), figures/tables, and reporting guidelines (CONSORT/STROBE/PRISMA) for research papers and journal submissions.

Write long-form content like blog posts, guides, tutorials, and newsletters with a distinctive, non-generic voice derived from supplied examples or brand guidance.

Writes documents in a plain, human voice and removes phrasing that reads as machine-generated, applying a two-pass write-and-audit process to any written artifact meant to be read by a person.

Revise an academic paper based on internal review comments. Reads review report or annotated manuscript, then applies revisions one by one with user approval. Trigger when user says "self revise" / "paper-selfrevise" / "内部修改" / "根据审稿意见修改".

专业学术论文审稿 skill。以领域专家视角对学术论文（本地 PDF、arXiv ID/URL、粘贴文本）进行系统评审，自动识别论文学科与贡献类型并切换对应领域专家标准，输出顶会 OpenReview 风格（NeurIPS/ICLR/ICML）的标准 review 意见：Summary、Strengths、Weaknesses、Questions to Authors、Overall Score (1-10)、Confidence。输出语言跟随论文语言。触发场景包括：审论文、审稿、论文评审、review this paper、peer review、写评审意见、帮我看看这篇论文能不能中、rebuttal 前自查等。

以论文作者身份完成学术审稿 rebuttal 全流程。当用户提供审稿意见（reviewer comments / reviews / meta-review）和论文文件（PDF/LaTeX/DOCX/Markdown），需要分析审稿意见、判断是否需要修改论文、修改论文并撰写给审稿人的逐条回复（rebuttal / response letter / author response）时使用。触发词包括：rebuttal、审稿意见回复、回复审稿人、response to reviewers、审稿人意见、major/minor revision 回复。

Orchestrates the full academic research pipeline from exploration to final manuscript, coordinating research, writing, integrity verification, peer review, revision, and finalization stages with user confirmation checkpoints.

规划、撰写、重构、润色、压缩、扩写、收口和审校中文医学文本，并为持续项目建立写作主控索引、内容型总纲、全文一致性账本、章节任务书、证据账本、决策记录和最终交付物清单。支持 Grant（医学基金标书、项目申请、研究目标、任务分解、技术路线、进度与甘特图、项目管理、风险分析、创新性、预期效益、研究基础和可行性论证）与 Journal（毕业论文、期刊论文、综述、病例报告、指南解读和学术报告），自动识别或联合调用全文建构、局部构篇、语言精修、结构审计、语言审计及项目收口。

Mine proof-heavy papers, notes, PDFs, Markdown, or LaTeX sources into source-indexed proof-material files. Use when the user wants to extract technically nontrivial lemmas, estimates, definitions, dependencies, reductions, constructions, or proof strategies, preserve paper locations and stable material IDs, run DeepSeek screening/backtests, and update the proof-material index rather than writing directly to proof-usage.

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from academic medical papers. Use when editing or reviewing manuscripts to make them sound more natural and professionally written. Based on Wikipedia's "Signs of AI writing" guide, adapted for medical literature. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated significance claims, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, AI vocabulary words, copula avoidance, excessive hedging, generic conclusions, informal word choices (linked/beyond/via/where/yield), overly assertive causal claims, and artificially condensed expressions. Preserves legitimate academic transitions (Notably, Prior studies have shown, etc.).

Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.