Results for “writing-review”

Detects and eliminates AI writing tropes that make text sound artificial or formulaic. Use when generating text content, writing documentation, creating code comments, or reviewing writing style. Supports four-tier JSON preferences (global/project x shared/local office.json) read via load-preferences.sh.

Provides nine skills for Nature-journal-family academic publishing, covering figure creation, prose polishing, manuscript writing, citation formatting, data availability statements, paper reading, reviewer responses, paper-to-PPT conversion, and academic search via an MCP server.

Write academic papers with a 12-agent pipeline supporting full drafting, revision, citation checks, and LaTeX/DOCX output across multiple disciplines and paper types.

Detect and eliminate predictable AI writing tells from prose. Use when the user asks to "make this sound less like AI", "remove AI tells", "make it more human", "this sounds robotic", "clean up the writing", "too formal", "sounds generated", or requests a writing/copy review. Do NOT use for code — this skill targets prose, copy, and documentation only.

Guides a structured software requirements specification workflow from topic intake through brainstorming, spec writing, planning, review, SRS generation, validation, and improvement reporting.

Guides a structured requirements pipeline from topic intake through brainstorming, spec and plan writing, user review, SRS generation, validation, and improvement reporting.

Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something

Evaluate scientific manuscripts and grant proposals with structured, checklist-based peer review covering methodology, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, and reporting standards.

Conduct systematic literature reviews by searching multiple academic databases, synthesizing findings, and generating professionally formatted documents with verified citations.

Collaborates on writing projects by researching topics, structuring outlines, improving hooks, providing section-by-section feedback, and managing citations while preserving the writer's voice.

Write business reports including executive summaries, status updates, postmortems, competitive analyses, data analyses, and quarterly reviews. Use when communicating findings, decisions, or status to stakeholders. Also trigger for 'executive summary', 'status report', 'postmortem', 'incident report', 'competitive analysis', 'quarterly review', 'business report', or 'data analysis report'.

Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something

Revise an academic paper based on internal review comments. Reads review report or annotated manuscript, then applies revisions one by one with user approval. Trigger when user says "self revise" / "paper-selfrevise" / "内部修改" / "根据审稿意见修改".

Create, refresh, and rewrite PR titles and descriptions following Sentry conventions, focusing on reviewer-facing content that describes the full branch diff.

Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something

Reviews an academic paper using the NeurIPS review form with three reviewer personas, ensemble scoring, and reflection refinement. Extracts text from PDF, runs structured review, and outputs actionable feedback.

Produces high-quality written knowledge artifacts such as READMEs, guides, API specs, tutorials, runbooks, and wikis, with audience-appropriate structure and accuracy.

专业学术论文审稿 skill。以领域专家视角对学术论文（本地 PDF、arXiv ID/URL、粘贴文本）进行系统评审，自动识别论文学科与贡献类型并切换对应领域专家标准，输出顶会 OpenReview 风格（NeurIPS/ICLR/ICML）的标准 review 意见：Summary、Strengths、Weaknesses、Questions to Authors、Overall Score (1-10)、Confidence。输出语言跟随论文语言。触发场景包括：审论文、审稿、论文评审、review this paper、peer review、写评审意见、帮我看看这篇论文能不能中、rebuttal 前自查等。

Writing, exploit: shape raw material into an article, paragraph by paragraph.

Guide users through writing a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 framework. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'systematic review', 'systematic literature review', 'SLR', 'PRISMA', 'PRISMA 2020', 'PRISMA flow diagram', 'PRISMA checklist', or asks for help writing, structuring, or auditing a literature review that follows reporting guidelines. Also trigger when the user asks about inclusion/exclusion criteria for a review, search strategies for databases like Scopus/WoS/PubMed, study selection processes, risk of bias assessment, or narrative synthesis for a review paper. This skill covers the full PRISMA 2020 checklist (27 items), produces a Word document manuscript in strict journal article format, generates an annotated PRISMA flow diagram, and enforces APA 7th Edition referencing throughout. It does NOT cover meta-analysis or statistical pooling. By Chuah Kee Man.

Generate academic referee reports for economics/finance papers, followed by a 150-word letter to the editor with recommendation (Reject / Major Revision) and Kai Wu signature. Two modes (normal / high-level), configurable number of comments; recommendation choice drives evaluation tone (Reject → negative, Major Revision → neutral). Trigger when user says "referee report" / "write referee report" / "审稿报告" / "写审稿意见" / "generate referee report" / "review this paper".

Writing, exploit; assemble raw material into a journey of beats, grounding each term before a beat leans on it.

以论文作者身份完成学术审稿 rebuttal 全流程。当用户提供审稿意见（reviewer comments / reviews / meta-review）和论文文件（PDF/LaTeX/DOCX/Markdown），需要分析审稿意见、判断是否需要修改论文、修改论文并撰写给审稿人的逐条回复（rebuttal / response letter / author response）时使用。触发词包括：rebuttal、审稿意见回复、回复审稿人、response to reviewers、审稿人意见、major/minor revision 回复。

Generate or improve MATLAB help text (documentation comments) for a function, class, or script file following MathWorks standards (H1 line, syntax paragraphs, See Also, 75-char lines). Read BEFORE writing MATLAB help — default patterns (Inputs:/Outputs: lists, block comments, uppercase See Also) produce non-conforming output. Use when writing, rewriting, fixing, or reviewing MATLAB help comments or function documentation.

REST API design — resource naming, HTTP methods, status codes, pagination, versioning, OpenAPI. Use when designing a new REST API, reviewing API contracts, writing OpenAPI/Swagger documentation, or choosing pagination, versioning, or error-format strategies.

Write competitive research proposals for NSF, NIH, DOE, DARPA, and Taiwan NSTC with agency-specific formatting, review criteria, budget preparation, and compliance guidance.

Use when writing or editing a code comment or a documentation block, and when reviewing the comments and documentation in a diff before presenting it. Decides what stays in the source, what moves to reference documentation, and what gets deleted.

Testing standards using JUnit 5, AssertJ, Mockito, Cucumber, and Spring Boot integration tests for Java. Use when writing or reviewing Java test behavior, including parallel execution and BDD; defer Kotlin-only tests, virtual-thread test infrastructure, and coverage-report/tooling configuration.

Remove signs of AI-generated writing from academic medical papers. Use when editing or reviewing manuscripts to make them sound more natural and professionally written. Based on Wikipedia's "Signs of AI writing" guide, adapted for medical literature. Detects and fixes patterns including: inflated significance claims, superficial -ing analyses, vague attributions, AI vocabulary words, copula avoidance, excessive hedging, generic conclusions, informal word choices (linked/beyond/via/where/yield), overly assertive causal claims, and artificially condensed expressions. Preserves legitimate academic transitions (Notably, Prior studies have shown, etc.).

Resolves an approved article comment task into a publishable AI markdown reply by fetching article context from a local HTTP API (with sf-cli fallback), reasoning with the selected quote and full article content, and writing the final reply to a backend-provided local result file path.