Results for “validation”

Research-obsessed strategist for webinar discovery. Use for webinar research, hook generation, topic validation, angle finding, audience analysis, content discovery, competitive landscape. Triggers: 'webinar research', 'find angle', 'webinar hook', 'topic research', 'discovery phase'.

Stress-test a feature idea for an existing product by surfacing risky assumptions across Value, Usability, Viability, and Feasibility using multi-perspective devil's advocate thinking.

Agent profile for prioritize product scope, user outcomes, MVP slices, roadmap tradeoffs, and launch criteria. Use when Codex needs a specialist agent perspective for planning, implementation, review, debugging, validation, or handoff in this domain.

Tracks indicators of compromise from initial discovery through validation, enrichment, deployment, monitoring, and retirement to maintain a high-quality, actionable indicator database.

Run a structured 5-day process to prototype, test, and validate product ideas with real users. Covers mapping, sketching, deciding, prototyping, and testing across Monday-Friday.

Manage Gate entities — validation checkpoints that WorkItems, scopes, or policy applications must pass (code review, security scan, tests). Use when defining or updating a checkpoint for v2 workflow surfaces — code review, tests green, security scan, stakeholder approval.

Parallel multi-source search combining Web, Scholar, Smart, and Tavily results with confidence scoring and AI synthesis. Best for comprehensive research requiring cross-source validation. Use when: the user needs web search, research, source discovery, or content extraction.

Pressure-test any business idea with a five-angle adversarial panel (Critic, Champion, Analyst, Investigator, Customer) that returns a single GO/RESHAPE/KILL verdict with the cheapest test to de-risk it.

Turns a raw idea into four linked planning files through a five-phase pipeline: clarifying questions, deep research, a PRD with non-goals and metrics, and a phased execution plan with kill criteria.

Turn a refined research proposal or method idea into a detailed, claim-driven experiment roadmap. Use when the user asks for a detailed experiment plan, ablation matrix, evaluation protocol, run order, compute budget, or paper-ready validation that supports the core problem, novelty, simplicity, and any LLM / VLM / Diffusion / RL-based contribution.

Turn a refined research proposal or method idea into a detailed, claim-driven experiment roadmap. Use after `research-refine`, or when the user asks for a detailed experiment plan, ablation matrix, evaluation protocol, run order, compute budget, or paper-ready validation that supports the core problem, novelty, simplicity, and any LLM / VLM / Diffusion / RL-based contribution.

Extracts and reconciles medical provider, wage-loss, and insurance/lien data from personal injury plaintiff fact sheets and initial disclosures against builder draft responses. Use when the user mentions PFS analysis, medical provider reconciliation, wage loss audit, insurance lien tracking, PI discovery reconciliation, builder response validation, MDL plaintiff data extraction, FRCP 26(a)(1) disclosures, treatment chronologies, or specials spreadsheets.

Requires python3, and AISA_API_KEY. Uses the supplied AISA_API_KEY to send requests to https://api.aisa.one. Native-first ClawHub plugin for `multi-search`. Ships the packaged AIsa skill with an `openclaw.plugin.json` manifest and a Claude-compatible bundle fallback. Parallel multi-source search combining Web, Scholar, Smart, and Tavily results with confidence scoring and AI synthesis. Best for comprehensive research requiring cross-source validation. Use when: the user needs web search, research, source discovery, or content extraction.

Discover what customers truly need by analyzing the "job" they hire your product to do. Use when the user mentions "customer discovery", "why customers churn", "what job does this solve", "competing against luck", "product-market fit", "switching behavior", "milkshake moment", or "functional vs emotional jobs". Also trigger when investigating why users choose competitors, designing features around real customer needs, or reframing product value propositions. Covers JTBD interviews, competition analysis, and jobs-oriented roadmaps. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome. For rapid validation, see design-sprint.

Run Mom Test–style customer-discovery interviews to validate or kill an unbuilt idea — generate a non-leading interview guide, conduct or coach the conversations, and synthesize signal vs compliments. Load when the user asks to do customer discovery, run problem interviews, validate an idea with users, run a Mom Test, design an interview guide, or says "talk to customers", "validate the problem", "interview users", "Mom Test this", "did real users want it", "synthesize my interviews", "I just talked to N people". Sub-skill of `venture-exploration`. Hard-bans "would you use this?", solution-pitching, friend/family-only ICP, and treating compliments as validation. Calls `secure-*` before synthesizing any pasted external transcripts.

Designs the contract for an API change inside one codebase — a component's props, a function surface, URL or query parameters, an event payload, or a module boundary — through a discovery pass, an options document with one recommendation, a question round, and an adversarial validation round, with every element of the contract justified from one stated goal. Use when you want to design, shape, decide, or nail down an interface, contract, signature, or API change for a capability you can already describe, sized for roughly one pull request. Produces a design document and changes no code. Does not specify what a feature should do — use plan-a-feature. Does not plan delivery or sequencing — use plan-implementation. Does not assess the architecture of existing code — use architectural-analysis. Does not write the code — use tdd. Does not restructure existing code — use refactor. Runs its rounds without pausing for review; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.