Results for “pr-plan”

Automatically detects project state and runs an 8-phase pipeline to plan, build, test, lint, fix bugs, and document code across multiple AI coding agents.

Converts syllabi, past papers, or notes into a ranked study roadmap ordered by difficulty, with support for theory, numericals, MCQs, coding, and lab prep.

Breaks natural-language problem descriptions into sub-tasks suitable for DAG nodes. The entry point of the meta-DAG. Identifies phases, dependencies, parallelization opportunities, and vague/pluripotent nodes that can't yet be specified. Uses domain meta-skills when available. Activate on "decompose task", "break down problem", "plan workflow", "what are the steps", "sub-tasks", "task breakdown". NOT for executing the decomposed tasks (use dag-runtime), building the DAG structure (use dag-planner), or matching skills to nodes (use dag-skills-matcher).

Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands, prioritizing correctness over speed for high-stakes or unfamiliar code.

Coordinates a squad of specialized agents for software development, routing tasks and managing context across requirements, planning, architecture, implementation, review, testing, and deployment phases.

Provides structured coaching for founders and first-time CEOs, covering archetype identification, delegation frameworks, energy management, calendar audits, leadership evolution, and blind spot identification.

P7 Senior Engineer mode — solution-driven execution under P8 supervision. Use when user says 'P7模式', '方案驱动', or when spawned as sub-task executor by P8. Produces: implementation plan + code + 3-question self-review, delivered via [P7-COMPLETION].

Design user journeys and task flows for a product concept or MVP. Use when the team needs primary flows, branch conditions, edge cases, onboarding paths, and end-to-end user movement before screen planning or UI implementation.

P7 Senior Engineer mode — solution-driven execution under P8 supervision. Use when user says 'P7模式', '方案驱动', or when spawned as sub-task executor by P8. Produces: implementation plan + code + 3-question self-review, delivered via [P7-COMPLETION].

Run a user story mapping workshop with adaptive questions and a structured map output, generating backbone activities, user tasks, and release slices for a workflow.

Automates privacy impact assessments including data flow mapping, risk scoring, GDPR/CCPA compliance checks, and remediation planning using the NIST Privacy Framework and ICO DPIA guidance.

Use when planning a COLT (Conference on Learning Theory) submission calendar backward from the single AoE paper deadline — proof-completion and verification milestones, writing and appendix-assembly passes, CMT logistics, the rebuttal window, decision aftermath, and PMLR camera-ready with conference presentation in early summer.

Guide for translating code between programming languages. Use when converting code from one language to another, planning language migrations, understanding conversion challenges, asking about type mappings, idiom translations, or referencing pattern mappings. Covers APTV workflow, type systems, error handling, concurrency, and language-specific gotchas.

Look up and apply the cooked, indexed proof playbook built from proof-material. Use when the user is proving a theorem, planning a proof, seeking reusable proof moves by task shape, assumptions, tags, desired move, or material source ID, or adapting cooked local moves and macro strategies with public source attribution.

Use when planning a UIST cycle end to end — the late-March abstract and paper deadlines, the ten-week build-freeze before video production, the rebuttal window, conditional acceptance, the July camera-ready, adjunct-track parallel lanes, and the November conference — with owners and risk buffers.

Parses complex problems into DAG (Directed Acyclic Graph) execution structures. Decomposes tasks into nodes with dependencies, identifies parallelization opportunities, and creates optimal execution plans. Activate on 'build dag', 'create workflow graph', 'decompose task', 'execution graph', 'task graph'. NOT for simple linear tasks or when an existing DAG structure is provided.

Use when planning a FOCS (IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science) cycle end to end — working backward from the April 1 deadline, managing the live post-submission summer of the 2026 cycle, coordinating with the STOC beat, preparing the November conference, and scheduling a FOCS 2027 attempt.

Content Factory video production loop for Cursor agents. Use when the user says @video-loop, make/create/generate a video with Content Factory, or asks to run a calendar slot into a finished accepted video. Enforces plan APPROVE gate and video-acceptance criteria before completion.

Edits real video footage through a structured pipeline: transcribe and plan with an AI agent, cut with FFmpeg, compose with Remotion, generate voiceover and music via ElevenLabs and fal.ai, then polish in Descript or CapCut.

Manage, inventory, standardize, migrate, and test reusable Codex skills for the MetaSkill repository. Use when Codex needs to inspect local skills, convert a personal workflow into a public skill candidate, normalize skill folder shape, plan skill promotion, or decide whether a skill belongs in skill-management, publication-review, or skill-examples.

Use when planning an ICDM (IEEE International Conference on Data Mining) project timeline from venue fit through the abstract and full-paper deadlines, the long summer wait to the August notification, the no-rebuttal review, the possible short-paper acceptance branch, IEEE camera-ready, and in-person presentation on a single annual deadline.

Use before any complex or ambiguous task where the path forward is unclear. For breaking down multi-step problems, choosing between approaches, clarifying vague requirements, identifying hidden assumptions, planning before building, and preventing costly mistakes from starting in the wrong direction. Activate when user says "how should I approach this", "what's the best way to", "I'm not sure how to", or presents a problem without a clear solution.

Provides a structured workflow for migrating an Android XML View to Jetpack Compose. This skill details the step-by-step process, from planning and dependency setup, to theming and layout migration, validation and XML cleanup. Use this skill when you need to migrate an XML View to Jetpack Compose in an Android project. It solves the problem of converting the UI of a legacy XML View into modern, declarative Compose components while maintaining interoperability.

Creates or updates a repo's CLAUDE.md by exploring the code and adding the standard workflow sections (git/PR rules, changes that require human review, non-obvious context). Use whenever the user is starting in a new repo, says "set up the CLAUDE.md", "onboard this repo", "there's no CLAUDE.md here", or asks to complete or improve an existing CLAUDE.md — or in Spanish "armá el CLAUDE.md", "iniciá este repo", "falta el CLAUDE.md acá". Also run it before the first time `plan` runs in a repo that has no CLAUDE.md yet.

Local CLI issue tracker for todos, follow-ups, structured records, and the canonical pattern for decomposing multi-step work into a parent + subissues with acceptance criteria, dependency edges, and priority. Use when the user mentions a task to remember, a bug to track, an open question, anything that needs to outlive the current turn, or when planning multi-heartbeat work that needs `chainlink issue ready`-driven pickup across sessions. Includes guidance on writing descriptions future-you can act on (handles, success path, failure path) and idempotency tactics for actions that might fire twice (boundary firing, overlapping heartbeats, retried subagent completion). Pairs with five-whys (chainlink is the storage backend for RCA trees). Storage is local — issues live under a `.chainlink/` directory in the operator's repo.

Captures and organizes chaotic brain dumps into a structured, actionable system with zero information loss. Use this skill whenever the user says 'capture this', 'brain dump', 'let me dump some ideas', 'I've got a bunch of thoughts', 'here's everything on my mind', 'idea dump', 'let me get this out of my head', 'I need to organize my thoughts', 'here's what I'm thinking', or any variation where someone is unloading a messy stream of ideas, tasks, thoughts, and plans wanting them turned into something coherent. Also trigger when the user pastes or dictates a long, unstructured block of mixed ideas — even without the exact phrase — the intent is the same. Fast-to-action by design: no upfront intake. Output is four sections (Projects/Ideas, Tasks, Connections, How I Can Help) ending with a directive question. Asks at most one mid-organization clarifying question when a single item is genuinely ambiguous between task and project.