Results for “find”

Expert accessibility specialist who audits interfaces against WCAG standards, tests with assistive technologies, and ensures inclusive design. Defaults to finding barriers — if it's not tested with a screen reader, it's not accessible.

Generates a structured HTML prep file for the next working day by pulling calendar data via WorkIQ, classifying meetings, detecting conflicts, finding learning and deep-work slots, and providing productivity recommendations.

Searches for existing content pages containing a specific block in AEM Edge Delivery Services, reporting URLs with occurrences and variants to help identify test content during development.

Performs STRIDE-A threat model analysis of repositories and systems, producing architecture overviews, DFD diagrams, prioritized findings, and executive assessments. Supports both single analysis and incremental updates with change tracking.

Routes to 82 Lightning Web Components skill packages covering reactivity, wire adapters, component communication, accessibility, performance, security, and Jest testing. Finds and opens the exact skill package for LWC-related requests.

Prepare for tomorrow's meetings and tasks. Pulls calendar from Outlook via WorkIQ, cross-references open tasks and workspace context, classifies meetings, detects conflicts and day-fit issues, finds learning and deep-work slots, and generates a structured HTML prep file with productivity recommendations.

Runs adversarial UI tests in a real browser using the browse CLI, analyzing git diffs to test only changed areas or exploring the full app to find bugs in functionality, accessibility, responsive layout, and UX.

Finds and safely removes dead code across a codebase: unreachable paths, unused exports, functions, variables, CSS selectors, dependencies, env vars, and commented-out blocks. Builds an import graph, verifies no dynamic references, and runs build and tests after cleanup.

Adversarial red-team of a running web, React Native, or Capacitor hybrid app. Use when asked to "red team this app", "attack my app", "break it", "find all the defects", "adversarial test", "pre-launch hardening", "pentest the app", or "full app QA". Naive monkey / guest vs logged-in wander → test-exploratory.

Create or amend a self-contained PowerPoint-like HTML briefing slide deck for alignment pages, interrogation questions, research findings, framework/workshop artifacts, specs, reports, or documentation plans. Use when Codex should make review material more visual and navigable while preserving dense alignment/interrogation pages and source documents as linked references instead of auto-opening them.

BOM (Bill of Materials) management for electronics projects — the primary orchestrator skill that coordinates DigiKey, Mouser, LCSC, element14, JLCPCB, PCBWay, and KiCad skills into a unified workflow. Create, update, and maintain BOMs with part numbers, costs, quantities stored as KiCad symbol properties. ALWAYS trigger this skill for any task involving component sourcing, pricing, ordering, distributor searches, BOM export, or fabrication preparation — even if the user names a specific distributor or fab house (e.g. "search DigiKey for...", "generate JLCPCB BOM", "order from Mouser"). This skill decides which distributor/fab skills to invoke and in what order. Also trigger on phrases like "what parts do I need", "order components", "how much will this cost", "export for JLCPCB", "find parts for this board", "cost estimate", "compare pricing", or "check stock".

Analyze a website page's UI for obvious oddities: the same information repeated multiple times (a phone number shown three times in the header, a '24/7' badge in two places, a bullet list restating the paragraph above it), duplicated or near-duplicate copy and sections, stray/orphaned text near CTAs, copy that doesn't match the business or section subject, placeholder text, overcrowded heroes, misaligned elements, and imagery that doesn't fit the business. Use this whenever the user asks to check, audit, review, sanity-check, QA, or 'look over' a web page, landing page, or UI — whether they give a live URL, a localhost/dev-server URL, a screenshot, or HTML/JSX/template files — even if they only say something casual like 'does this page look right?', 'find anything weird on this page', or 'anything off about my landing page?'.

Reconstruct a product flow, then audit how usable it is — whether it makes sense, where users get confused or stuck, whether the copy and instructions are clear, and where friction causes drop-off. Produces a prioritized, severity-weighted findings report. Works from three inputs: frontend code in a repo, a live running app driven via a browser, or a written flow / spec / screenshots. Use this skill whenever the user asks for a UX review, usability audit, "is this flow confusing", "does this signup/onboarding/checkout make sense", "why are people dropping off", "audit this form", "where's the friction", or hands over a flow and asks whether it's user-friendly. Trigger even on casual phrasings ("is my checkout any good?") — it imposes the structure ad-hoc UX opinions miss. Audits flow usability and friction; for visual polish and interface quality the impeccable audit/critique skills apply instead.