Results for “question”

CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use when asked to "think bigger", "expand scope", "strategy review", "rethink this", or "is this ambitious enough". Proactively suggest when the user is questioning scope or ambition of a plan, or when the plan feels like it could be thinking bigger. (gstack)

The practice of collecting, analyzing, and acting on data to drive product decisions. Great analytics isn't about dashboards—it's about insights that lead to action. Every metric should answer a question that changes behavior. This skill covers event tracking, metrics design, dashboards, user behavior analysis, and data-driven decision making. The best analytics teams measure what matters, not what's easy to measure. Use when "analytics, metrics, tracking, dashboard, funnel, cohort, retention, events, KPI, measure, data, insights, conversion, engagement, analytics, metrics, data, dashboards, tracking, funnels, cohorts, KPIs, insights" mentioned.

Turn "we should run some ads" into a paid-ads plan you can hand to a buyer. Audiences, the offer per audience, the creative angles, the budget split, the metric that calls it a win, and a kill rule so you stop feeding losers. Built for B2B marketing teams, customizable to your channels and your funnel. Trigger on "build a paid ads plan", "how should we split budget", "what should the ads say", "what's our target CPL", "when do we kill a campaign", or any paid-media planning question.

Score the experience a new customer actually has, not just whether they activated. Grades the first 90 days on the moments that make someone feel taken care of, finds where the welcome goes cold, and hands back a scored audit with the specific fixes. Built for any post-sale team, customizable to your product and lifecycle. Trigger on "audit my onboarding", "score our onboarding experience", "why do new customers churn early", "grade our first 90 days", "where does onboarding go cold", "is our welcome any good", or any onboarding-quality question.

Give a decisive, project-grounded point of view in the subject's own shape: a graded verdict on an external-adoption question, a holistic take on a document, or a position on a user-supplied approach set. Use for a solo POV, a mid-session second opinion, a named-peer cross-check, any request to consult other models or reconcile their opinions, an `oracle` panel, or a correction-cost-gated proactive cross-check offer. Not for findings review (use ce-doc-review), neutral explainers, or generating options (use ce-ideate or ce-brainstorm).

Turn "we should get press" into an earned-media plan a journalist might actually answer. The story angle worth their byline, a target list by beat, a pitch built for one reporter at a time, and a follow-up rhythm that is persistent without being a pest. Built for B2B teams doing their own PR, customizable to your story and your beats. Trigger on "help me pitch this", "build a PR plan", "which journalists cover this", "write a media pitch", "how do I follow up with press", or any earned-media outreach question.

Expert CSRD (Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive, EU 2022/2464) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about CSRD, European Sustainability Reporting Standards (ESRS), double materiality assessment, sustainability reporting obligations, ESG disclosure, CSRD scope and thresholds, value chain reporting, XBRL digital tagging, third-party assurance, CSRD gap assessments, CSRD implementation timelines, ESRS E1–E5 environmental standards, ESRS S1–S4 social standards, ESRS G1 governance, CSRD vs GRI/TCFD/SASB alignment, or any EU corporate sustainability reporting question. Trigger even if the user only mentions "ESG reporting Europe", "sustainability disclosure EU", or "non-financial reporting".

Match a user request to the right skill using trigger matching, project context, and conversation history. Score ambiguity 1–10 and resolve it using context signals or a single clarifying question. Load when project-orchestrator needs to route a request, or when multiple skills could match and the right one is unclear. Also triggers on "which skill should handle this", "route this request", "I'm not sure which skill to use", "disambiguate this", "skill routing". Called by project-orchestrator for request routing. For finding whether a skill exists for a capability, use skill-finder instead.

Turn "which leads should I work?" into a lead-by-lead work plan. Per-lead status (never-touched, engaged-not-replied, gone-cold, hot), days-dark per lead, last-touch quality, a re-engagement ranker, and a recommended next action for every lead. Built for SDRs and full-cycle reps, customizable to your CRM and your outreach tool. Trigger on "which leads should I work?", "who haven't I touched?", "show me cold leads", "hot leads to follow up on", "who's gone dark?", "re-engagement candidates", or any lead-level work-assignment question.

Re-onboard a churned customer with the same care they got the first time. Reads why they left and whether they left the door open, picks the ones worth winning back, and builds a warm re-onboarding sequence, not a "we miss you" discount blast. Built for any post-sale or growth team, customizable to your product and win-back window. Trigger on "win back churned customers", "re-engage a lost account", "build a win-back sequence", "which churned customers should we chase", "boomerang play", "re-onboard a customer who left", or any win-back question.

Turn "can we even hit this number" into a capacity model that shows the truth before the quarter does. Models ramped-rep productivity, builds the hiring plan the target requires, states the ramp assumptions plainly, and names the gap between plan and capacity so nobody discovers it in month three. Built for B2B sales and RevOps leaders, customizable to your ramp and your CRM. Trigger on "build a capacity model", "how many reps to hit the number", "what's the hiring plan", "are we capacity constrained", "model the ramp", or any capacity or headcount planning question.

Diagnose monogenic and syndromic obesity in children and adolescents using a structured step-by-step algorithm. Use this skill whenever a clinician suspects a genetic cause of obesity, asks about leptin deficiency, MC4R mutation, POMC deficiency, PCSK1 deficiency, leptin receptor deficiency, Bardet-Biedl syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, Alström syndrome, or any case of early-onset severe obesity with hyperphagia. Also trigger for questions about targeted pharmacotherapy including setmelanotide or metreleptin, or when to order a genomic obesity panel. Cross-references the NHS Genomic Test Finder skill to surface the relevant R-code once a diagnosis is reached.

Flip a problem, goal, or decision 180 degrees to find what forward thinking misses. Asks what would guarantee failure, then works backward to what must be avoided or changed. Load when the user says "invert this", "flip this problem", "what would guarantee failure", "think backward", "reverse engineer the goal", "think about it backwards", or when deep-thinking diagnoses an inversion frame. Also triggers on "what's the opposite of success here", "how would we sabotage this". Two methods: Failure Inversion and Opposite Goal. Max 2 clarifying questions before inverting. Always returns forward actions. For broader analysis, deep-thinking calls this.

Use this skill when the user asks about Hours of Service (HOS) rules under 49 CFR 395 — the 11-hour driving limit, 14-hour on-duty window, 60/70 hour rule, 30-minute break, 10-hour off-duty reset, 34-hour restart, sleeper berth provisions, split sleeper berth, short-haul exemption (150-air-mile), agricultural exemption, adverse driving conditions, ELD malfunction handling, personal conveyance, yard moves, or anything related to driver duty status. Cite specific 49 CFR 395 subsection. If the question involves a non-standard operation (passenger carrier, oilfield, agricultural, military), confirm which set of rules applies.

Expert guidance for FedRAMP certification and compliance. Use this skill whenever a user asks about FedRAMP authorization, ATO (Authority to Operate), cloud security for federal government, NIST SP 800-53 controls, CSP compliance, or any of the core FedRAMP document types: SSP, SAP, SAR, POA&M, CIS/CRM workbooks. Also trigger for questions about FedRAMP impact levels (Low, Moderate, High, LI-SaaS), FedRAMP 20x, OSCAL, 3PAO assessments, continuous monitoring (ConMon), gap assessments, system boundary definition, FedRAMP readiness, or architecture reviews for federal cloud. When in doubt, use this skill — it covers the full FedRAMP lifecycle from readiness through continuous monitoring.

Auto-review pipeline — reads the full CEO, design, eng, and DX review skills from disk and runs them sequentially with auto-decisions using 6 decision principles. Surfaces taste decisions (close approaches, borderline scope, codex disagreements) at a final approval gate. One command, fully reviewed plan out. Use when asked to "auto review", "autoplan", "run all reviews", "review this plan automatically", or "make the decisions for me". Proactively suggest when the user has a plan file and wants to run the full review gauntlet without answering 15-30 intermediate questions. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "auto plan", "automatic review".

Turn scattered closed deals into a win/loss program that changes what you ship and what you say. Picks who to interview, gives you the question guide, codes themes across deals so a pattern beats a single anecdote, and turns the pattern into a specific messaging or product change. Built for B2B GTM, product, and RevOps leaders, customizable to your motion and your CRM. Trigger on "start a win-loss program", "why are we losing deals", "run win-loss interviews", "what patterns are in our closed-lost", "who should I interview", or any win/loss or closed-deal analysis.

Builds a feature implementation plan from an existing feature specification (or equivalent context) through a facilitated team conversation. Use when the user wants to plan how to implement, build, deliver, or ship a feature that has already been specified. Does not specify what the feature should do — use plan-a-feature first. Does not design the contract for an interface — use design-an-api. Does not refine or stress-test an already-written plan — use iterative-plan-review. Runs its resolution rounds to completion and holds its questions until after they finish; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

Turn a pipeline target into a demand-generation plan that actually maps to the number. The ICP worth spending on, the offers by funnel stage, the channel mix that reaches them, the content that earns attention, and the pipeline math worked backward from the goal so you know if the plan can even hit it. Built for B2B marketing teams, customizable to your funnel and your channels. Trigger on "build a demand gen plan", "how do we hit our pipeline number", "what's our channel mix", "plan our content", "work the funnel math backward", or any demand-generation planning question.

Expert ISO 27001 compliance assistant for security and compliance teams. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO 27001 or ISO/IEC 27001, including any of the following: gap analysis, auditing, compliance assessments, control checklists, policy writing, document generation, Statement of Applicability (SoA), risk assessment, risk registers, risk treatment plans, Annex A controls, ISMS implementation, clause requirements, certification readiness, transitioning from 2013 to 2022, control implementation guidance, incident response policies, access control policies, supplier security, or any information security management system (ISMS) topic. Trigger even if the user doesn't say "skill" — any ISO 27001 or ISMS question should use this skill.

Turn "is this new customer going to stick?" into a first-90-day diagnostic. Day-30 / 60 / 90 activation tracking, a sales-to-success handoff quality score, champion engagement during the onboarding window, time-to-value milestone hit rate, and an early false-negative catch on customers already adopting. Built for CS leaders and CSMs, customizable to your CRM and your product-analytics tool. Trigger on "how's {account} onboarding going?", "first 90 day check on {customer}", "is {account} activating?", "time-to-value on {customer}", "handoff quality", "who's at risk in first 90 days?", or any first-90-day adoption question.

Your data-fill agent. Connect a contact-enrichment tool (contact-level) or a company-enrichment tool (company-level), or both for the full waterfall, to fill gaps on any list. Given a name plus a company, find email, phone, LinkedIn, and title. Given a domain, find headcount, funding, technographic profile, and hiring intent. Trigger on "enrich these contacts with emails", "find LinkedIn URLs for {list}", "get phone numbers for {contacts}", "who are the decision makers at {company}", "complete this prospect list", "enrich this CSV", "get the technographic stack for {company}", "fill in missing data on {list}", or any data-completion, list-enrichment, or contact-lookup question.

Expert NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) advisor covering CSF 2.0 and CSF 1.1. Use this skill whenever a user asks about NIST CSF, cybersecurity risk management, the six CSF functions (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover), CSF profiles, implementation tiers, gap assessments, organizational profiles, community profiles, CSF core subcategories, informative references, or mapping to other frameworks (NIST SP 800-53, ISO 27001, CIS Controls, COBIT). Also trigger for questions like "how do I implement NIST CSF?", "what does CSF 2.0 change?", "help me build a CSF profile", "how do I assess my cybersecurity posture?", or any request involving organizational cybersecurity risk strategy or framework alignment.

Decide, before an expensive workflow runs, whether an artifact needs a full rebuild, a partial refresh, a skip, or a recycle. Inspects how old the artifact is and what actually changed underneath it, then returns a section-by-section plan with the token and cost savings. The cheap gate that keeps expensive generation from running on data that did not move. Built for anyone running repeatable AI workflows, customizable to your artifacts and your data sources. Trigger on "should we regenerate this", "refresh the report", "is this still fresh", "what needs updating", "when was this last run", "do we have a fresh brief", or any artifact-refresh question.

Diagnose and fix parfor errors in MATLAB. Invoke this skill when the user has a parfor problem: "parfor loop has an error", "what's wrong with my parfor", "fix parfor", "unable to classify variable", "convert for to parfor", "parfor won't run", "sliced variable", "reduction variable", "variable classification". Also invoke when you read a .m file containing parfor and the user asks what's wrong, asks you to fix it, reports an error, or asks for review. Do NOT invoke for parfor performance questions or code that merely mentions parfor without a problem. ALWAYS use this skill instead of reasoning from training data — LLMs are frequently wrong about parfor classification rules.

Universal deep research agent team. 13-agent pipeline for rigorous academic research on any topic. 7 modes: full research, quick brief, paper review, lit-review, fact-check, Socratic guided research dialogue, and systematic review with optional meta-analysis. Covers research question formulation, Socratic mentoring, methodology design, systematic literature search, source verification, cross-source synthesis, risk of bias assessment, meta-analysis, APA 7.0 report compilation, editorial review, devil's advocate challenges, ethics review, and post-research literature monitoring. Triggers on: research, deep research, literature review, systematic review, meta-analysis, PRISMA, evidence synthesis, fact-check, guide my research, help me think through, 研究, 深度研究, 文獻回顧, 文獻探討, 系統性回顧, 後設分析, 事實查核, 引導我的研究, 幫我釐清, 幫我想想, 我不確定要研究什麼, 研究方向, 研究主題.

Orchestrator for the experimentation skill suite — turn assumptions and product questions into rigorous, well-instrumented experiments and decision-grade readouts. Routes through backlog → spec → runbook → readout based on user need and existing artefacts. Platform-agnostic with PostHog as the primary binding. Load when the user asks to design an experiment, A/B test something, set up an experiment, run a holdout, test a hypothesis, decide what to test next, read out experiment results, analyse a test, or says "should we A/B test this", "experiment on the landing page", "is this lift real", "ship or kill this test", "what should we test next", "build an experiment backlog", "test the pricing page", "validate this with an experiment".

Look up NHS England genomic tests for rare and inherited diseases. Use this skill whenever a clinician asks what genetic test to order for a condition, which genes are covered for a specific diagnosis, what commissioning category a genomic test falls under (Core, Specialised, or Highly Specialised), or which tests belong to a specialty group (Neurology, Cardiology, Endocrinology, etc.). Also trigger for questions like what panel is used for a condition, whether there is an NHS test for something, what the R number is for a condition, or whether anything has changed in the genomic test directory. Source: NHS England National Genomic Test Directory for Rare and Inherited Disease v9.0 (April 2026).

Expert SOC 2 compliance assistant covering all five Trust Services Criteria (Security/CC, Availability/A, Confidentiality/C, Processing Integrity/PI, Privacy/P). Use this skill whenever a user mentions SOC 2, Trust Services Criteria, SOC 2 Type 1 or Type 2, audit readiness, compliance gaps, control documentation, evidence collection, vendor risk questionnaires, or anything related to AICPA service organization controls. Trigger even for adjacent topics like "we need to get audited", "a customer asked for our security report", "writing an information security policy", or "preparing for an audit". Covers gap analysis, policy writing, control documentation, audit evidence preparation, and vendor risk reviews for organizations at any maturity level — from first-time startups to seasoned compliance teams.

Expert ISO 27701 Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) compliance advisor. Use this skill whenever a user asks about ISO/IEC 27701:2025, ISO/IEC 27701:2019, privacy information management, PIMS certification, PII controller or processor obligations, privacy risk assessment, Statement of Applicability for privacy, privacy by design, data subject rights, DPIA, records of processing activities, transitioning from ISO 27701:2019, GDPR alignment with ISO 27701, or any privacy management system topic. Also trigger for questions about Annex A.1 (controller controls), A.2 (processor controls), A.3 (shared security controls), or implementing a standalone PIMS without ISO 27001. When in doubt, use this skill — it covers the full ISO 27701 lifecycle from gap assessment through certification.

Build, debug, and optimize Claude API / Anthropic SDK apps. Apps built with this skill should include prompt caching. Also handles migrating existing Claude API code between Claude model versions (4.5 → 4.6, 4.6 → 4.7, retired-model replacements). TRIGGER when: code imports `anthropic`/`@anthropic-ai/sdk`; user asks for the Claude API, Anthropic SDK, or Managed Agents; user adds/modifies/tunes a Claude feature (caching, thinking, compaction, tool use, batch, files, citations, memory) or model (Opus/Sonnet/Haiku) in a file; questions about prompt caching / cache hit rate in an Anthropic SDK project. SKIP: file imports `openai`/other-provider SDK, filename like `*-openai.py`/`*-generic.py`, provider-neutral code, general programming/ML.

When the user wants multiple expert perspectives on a marketing question — a simulated board of advisors staffed by legendary marketers (Seth Godin, David Ogilvy, Eugene Schwartz, April Dunford, Rory Sutherland, Alex Hormozi, Byron Sharp, and more). Also use when the user mentions 'marketing council,' 'board of advisors,' 'advisory board,' 'what would Seth Godin say,' 'what would Ogilvy think,' 'channel Hormozi,' 'get multiple perspectives,' 'debate this,' 'have the council review,' 'marketing mentors,' or asks how a famous marketer would approach their problem. The council gives each advisor's take through their documented frameworks, surfaces where they disagree, and synthesizes a recommendation. For executing the winning direction, hand off to positioning, offers, copywriting, ads, or the relevant skill.

A funnel and account-scoring diagnostic engine for any sales org. Connect a CRM and a product-analytics tool (plus optional enrichment, community, and meeting tools). Three modes. (1) FUNNEL DIAGNOSIS finds leaky conversion gates by channel with per-stage leakage, dollarized leverage points, and cohort velocity. (2) SPRINT PLANNING enriches qualified accounts into a ranked backlog with verified buying committees. (3) SCORING AUDIT finds where your scoring model is missing real ICPs. Trigger on 'funnel diagnosis', 'diagnose the funnel', 'where are we leaking', 'why is [channel] underperforming', 'conversion by channel', 'sprint planning', 'score these accounts', 'find missed ICPs', 'audit the scoring model', or any channel-level cohort-conversion, account-prioritization, or scoring-gap question.

Expert HIPAA compliance assistant for healthcare and software contexts. Use this skill whenever the user mentions HIPAA, PHI (Protected Health Information), ePHI, covered entities, business associates, healthcare data privacy, medical records, health information security, BAA (Business Associate Agreements), or any compliance review involving patient data. Also trigger for requests to draft privacy notices, HIPAA policies, consent forms, security risk assessments, or breach notification letters. Use for developers building healthcare software who need technical safeguard guidance (encryption, access controls, audit logs), compliance officers reviewing documents or procedures, and anyone asking "is this HIPAA compliant?" or "what does HIPAA require for X?". When in doubt about whether a healthcare or data privacy question falls under this skill — use it.

STATA code pattern library for empirical archival accounting research. Provides tested syntax from 126 peer-reviewed JAR (Journal of Accounting Research) replication files (2017-2025). Use when the user asks procedural questions like "How do I implement [method]?" or "Show me code for [technique]" — including: entropy balancing, propensity score matching (PSM), difference-in-differences (DiD), regression discontinuity (RDD), instrumental variables (IV), event studies (CAR/BHAR), survival analysis, Fama-MacBeth regressions, bootstrap, quantile regression, reghdfe/xtreg/areg, clustering standard errors, fixed effects, esttab/outreg2 table formatting, winsorization, leads/lags. Users can specify their variables (e.g., treatment, outcomes, controls) and receive adapted syntax. NOTE: This skill provides code patterns from published papers, not research design advice.

Causal inference framework for answering "does X cause Y?" beyond correlation. DoWhy (Microsoft Research) provides the identify-estimate-refute loop: define a causal graph (DAG), identify the causal effect using backdoor/frontdoor/instrumental variable criteria, estimate treatment effects with multiple estimators, and validate results with automated refutation tests. Use when: distinguishing causation from correlation, estimating treatment effects (ATE, ATT, CATE), designing and analyzing A/B tests with confounders, using instrumental variables, performing counterfactual reasoning ("what would have happened if..."), validating causal claims with sensitivity analysis, working with observational data where randomization is impossible, or any analysis where the question is "what is the CAUSAL effect of X on Y" rather than just "how do X and Y relate?"