Results for “find”

Designer's eye QA: finds visual inconsistency, spacing issues, hierarchy problems, AI slop patterns, and slow interactions — then fixes them. Iteratively fixes issues in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying with before/after screenshots. For plan-mode design review (before implementation), use /plan-design-review. Use when asked to "audit the design", "visual QA", "check if it looks good", or "design polish". Proactively suggest when the user mentions visual inconsistencies or wants to polish the look of a live site. (gstack)

Guide for writing the abstract of an academic economics paper. Use this skill whenever the user asks for help writing, drafting, revising, or structuring an abstract for an economics paper - whether empirical micro, development economics, applied economics, or related fields. Also trigger when the user mentions "abstract," "paper summary," or asks how to compress their findings into a short description. This skill synthesizes best practices from David Evans (CGDev), Marc Bellemare, and patterns observed in top economics journals (AER, QJE, AEJ: Applied, etc.).

Read-only diagnostic that scans Claude Code session transcripts to surface which MCP servers and tools you actually use, ranked by call frequency, with zero-use servers flagged for removal. Use when planning an MCP cleanup, evaluating whether to keep a newly-added server, deciding which servers warrant token cost in the catalog, or before authoring an MCP-removal PR. Outputs a markdown report (last N days) — does not modify any settings. Pair with the manual `claude mcp remove <name>` step once findings are reviewed.

Use when an agent needs to send one private MetaWeb message to a remote Bot/MetaBot globalMetaId, or when a human wants to find any online Bot/MetaBot/agent/AI for casual chat without choosing a target or writing the first message. Treat Bot, bot, and MetaBot wording as equivalent and case-insensitive; treat agent and AI wording the same way when the intent is private or casual chat. Do not use this skill for paid service delegation, trace lifecycle handling, or network source management.

Hard readiness gate before implementation begins — cross-checks the constitution, feature spec, plan, and tasks for consistency, traceability, and unresolved ambiguity. Returns PASS or FAIL with specific findings. Load when the spec-driven-development orchestrator routes /analyze, when the user asks to cross-check spec vs plan, audit traceability, verify spec readiness, gate-check before implementation, or says "is this spec implementation-ready", "trace requirements to tasks", "/analyze", "spec sanity check", "spec readiness gate", "spec consistency check". Output: docs/reviews/YYYY-MM-DD-<slug>-spec-crosscheck.md.

Cloud security posture assessment for AWS, Azure, and GCP. Tests IAM privilege escalation paths, public storage exposure, serverless attack surface, database exposure, logging gaps, container registry security, and cloud-specific attacks. Both authenticated (with cloud credentials) and unauthenticated (external) modes. Uses nuclei cloud templates, Prowler, ScoutSuite, manual IMDS/metadata probing, and deep AWS/Azure/GCP CLI enumeration. Produces: cloud architecture diagram, attack path map, findings per category, compliance mapping (SOC 2, PCI DSS 4.0, HIPAA, CIS), PoCs for confirmed exploits. Chains into /gh-export for issue filing.

Extract actionable patterns, architecture decisions, code conventions, and skill-relevant insights from GitHub/GitLab repositories. Assess repo credibility, run the full security scan pipeline, and apply findings to existing skills, new skills, or the current project. Load when the user asks to learn from a repo, extract patterns from a codebase, study a repository, or analyze a repo for reusable techniques. Also triggers on "learn from this repo", "learn from this repository", "what can we learn from this codebase", "extract patterns from this repo", "study this repo".

Builds a new Claude Code skill from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the skill's design tree decision-by-decision — entity fit, use cases, name, description, workflow steps, tools, and progressive-disclosure layout — then reviews the finished skill against the plugin-building guidance and applies every fix it finds. Use when creating, authoring, scaffolding, designing, or drafting a new skill or slash command. Does not build an agent or subagent — use agent-builder. Does not serve, vendor, or refresh the authoring guidance itself — use guidance.

CEO/founder-mode plan review. Rethink the problem, find the 10-star product, challenge premises, expand scope when it creates a better product. Four modes: SCOPE EXPANSION (dream big), SELECTIVE EXPANSION (hold scope + cherry-pick expansions), HOLD SCOPE (maximum rigor), SCOPE REDUCTION (strip to essentials). Use when asked to "think bigger", "expand scope", "strategy review", "rethink this", or "is this ambitious enough". Proactively suggest when the user is questioning scope or ambition of a plan, or when the plan feels like it could be thinking bigger. (gstack)

Set up and verify a connection to an NI USRP radio (USRP E320, N300, N310, N320, N321, X300, X310, or X410) using Wireless Testbench. Use when connecting a USRP for the first time, configuring radio hardware, troubleshooting connection failures, or verifying a radio setup. Covers host inspection (OS, NIC type/speed/MTU), device discovery (findsdru, probesdru), UHD version checking, programmatic radio configuration, and basebandTransceiver verification. Also use when the user mentions USRP setup, radio not found, connection errors, dropped samples, or network configuration for SDR hardware.

Query the GTEx (Genotype-Tissue Expression) portal v2 REST API for tissue-specific gene expression (median TPM across 54 human tissues), expression QTLs (eQTLs), and splicing QTLs (sQTLs). Use when checking which tissues express a gene, finding which gene a non-coding/GWAS variant regulates via eQTLs, or interpreting variant regulatory effects across tissues. NOT for curated trait-variant associations (use alterlab-gwas), population allele frequencies or variant constraint (use alterlab-gnomad), or gene/transcript structure and ID mapping (use alterlab-ensembl). Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Use this skill when a user asks for SEO keyword research, keyword discovery, search volume analysis, keyword difficulty, search intent mapping, topic clusters, content opportunities, competitor keyword gaps, or a keyword strategy for a domain, URL, product, market, or seed topic. When a website is provided, crawl and interpret the site first, then use AIsa API access to DataForSEO keyword, SERP, trend, Labs, and OnPage endpoints plus AIsa LLM reasoning to find non-brand keyword opportunities. Use when: the user needs web search, research, source discovery, or content extraction.

Requires python3, and AISA_API_KEY. Uses the supplied AISA_API_KEY to send requests to https://api.aisa.one. Native-first ClawHub plugin for `stock-rumors`. Ships the packaged AIsa skill with an `openclaw.plugin.json` manifest and a Claude-compatible bundle fallback. Rumor Scanner — find early signals including M&A rumors, insider activity, analyst upgrades/downgrades, social whispers, and SEC/regulatory activity via AIsa API. Ranked by impact score. Use when the user asks about rumors, insider trading, M&A activity, analyst changes, or early market signals.

Score the experience a new customer actually has, not just whether they activated. Grades the first 90 days on the moments that make someone feel taken care of, finds where the welcome goes cold, and hands back a scored audit with the specific fixes. Built for any post-sale team, customizable to your product and lifecycle. Trigger on "audit my onboarding", "score our onboarding experience", "why do new customers churn early", "grade our first 90 days", "where does onboarding go cold", "is our welcome any good", or any onboarding-quality question.

Give a decisive, project-grounded point of view in the subject's own shape: a graded verdict on an external-adoption question, a holistic take on a document, or a position on a user-supplied approach set. Use for a solo POV, a mid-session second opinion, a named-peer cross-check, any request to consult other models or reconcile their opinions, an `oracle` panel, or a correction-cost-gated proactive cross-check offer. Not for findings review (use ce-doc-review), neutral explainers, or generating options (use ce-ideate or ce-brainstorm).

ACTIVATE THIS SKILL FOR ANY SHELL COMMAND OR FILE READ. Check curl, wget, rm, sudo, apt, dpkg, chmod, dd, format, powershell, bash, sh. Check pipe patterns like | sh or | bash. Check shell wrappers like bash -c, xargs, find -exec. Check cloud CLI (aws, gcloud, kubectl, terraform). Check when user says sysadmin told me, Stack Overflow says, is this safe, can I run. Block reading of .env, .ssh, .aws, and credential files. This skill blocks dangerous commands and warns on risky ones. ALWAYS apply the safety protocol from this document before responding about any command.

Builds a new Claude Code agent (subagent) from scratch through a relentless, evidence-based interview that walks the agent's design tree decision-by-decision — entity fit, domain focus and vocabulary, role identity, anti-patterns, description, model tier, tools, and self-containment — then reviews the finished agent against the plugin-building guidance and applies every fix it finds. Use when creating, authoring, scaffolding, designing, or drafting a new agent or subagent. Does not build a skill or slash command — use skill-builder. Does not serve, vendor, or refresh the authoring guidance itself — use guidance.

Requires python3, and AISA_API_KEY. Uses the supplied AISA_API_KEY to send requests to https://api.aisa.one. Native-first ClawHub plugin for `stock-hot`. Ships the packaged AIsa skill with an `openclaw.plugin.json` manifest and a Claude-compatible bundle fallback. Hot Scanner — find the most trending and high-momentum stocks and crypto right now via AIsa API. Top gainers, losers, most active by volume, crypto highlights, news catalysts, and top 5 watchlist picks. Use when the user asks about trending stocks, what's hot, market movers, or momentum plays.

Extract actionable insights from blog posts, web articles, and practitioner content - assess credibility, run security checks, and either improve existing skills or apply to the current project. Load when the user asks to learn from an article, extract insights from a blog post, apply a practitioner's findings, or process engineering blog content. Also triggers on "learn from this article", "learn from this blog post", "extract insights from this post", "what can we learn from this article", "apply this article", or when the user links to a blog, Medium, Substack, dev.to, or engineering blog post.

Run a pre-mortem — imagine the project has already failed one year from now and work backward to find the root causes before they happen. Load when the user asks for a pre-mortem, wants to imagine failure before committing, asks "what could go wrong before we start", "assume this fails — why", "risk analysis before launch", "what kills this project", "what could go wrong", or when deep-thinking diagnoses a pre-mortem frame. Based on Gary Klein's prospective hindsight method, which surfaces failure causes more effectively than forward risk analysis. Most useful right before a major commitment.

Extract actionable skill knowledge from academic papers and research articles, assess credibility, run security checks, and either improve existing skills or create new ones. Load when the user asks to learn from a paper, extract insights from a research paper, turn a paper into a skill, apply paper findings to skills, read this paper and improve my skills, or process a research article. Also triggers on "skill from paper", "learn from this paper", "paper to skill", "extract from this research", "apply this paper", or when the user uploads or links to an academic PDF or paper URL.

Diagnose monogenic and syndromic obesity in children and adolescents using a structured step-by-step algorithm. Use this skill whenever a clinician suspects a genetic cause of obesity, asks about leptin deficiency, MC4R mutation, POMC deficiency, PCSK1 deficiency, leptin receptor deficiency, Bardet-Biedl syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, Alström syndrome, or any case of early-onset severe obesity with hyperphagia. Also trigger for questions about targeted pharmacotherapy including setmelanotide or metreleptin, or when to order a genomic obesity panel. Cross-references the NHS Genomic Test Finder skill to surface the relevant R-code once a diagnosis is reached.

Flip a problem, goal, or decision 180 degrees to find what forward thinking misses. Asks what would guarantee failure, then works backward to what must be avoided or changed. Load when the user says "invert this", "flip this problem", "what would guarantee failure", "think backward", "reverse engineer the goal", "think about it backwards", or when deep-thinking diagnoses an inversion frame. Also triggers on "what's the opposite of success here", "how would we sabotage this". Two methods: Failure Inversion and Opposite Goal. Max 2 clarifying questions before inverting. Always returns forward actions. For broader analysis, deep-thinking calls this.

Turn "is this account a real fit?" into a stacked verdict. A composite 0-100 fit score built from every signal you have, a breakdown by source, override flags for when a scoring tool is wrong, a channel classification, and a written rationale. Built for reps, marketers, and RevOps, customizable to your CRM and whatever scoring you use. Trigger on "is {account} a real fit?", "score this list against our profile", "find lookalikes to our best customers", "why is the score wrong on {account}?", "validate this prospect list", "what's our coverage in {segment}?", or any account or list qualification.

Systematically QA test a web application and fix bugs found. Runs QA testing, then iteratively fixes bugs in source code, committing each fix atomically and re-verifying. Use when asked to "qa", "QA", "test this site", "find bugs", "test and fix", or "fix what's broken". Proactively suggest when the user says a feature is ready for testing or asks "does this work?". Three tiers: Quick (critical/high only), Standard (+ medium), Exhaustive (+ cosmetic). Produces before/after health scores, fix evidence, and a ship-readiness summary. For report-only mode, use /qa-only. (gstack) Voice triggers (speech-to-text aliases): "quality check", "test the app", "run QA".

Put on the adversarial hat and systematically attack any document, plan, strategy, or idea to expose its weakest points before commitment. Structured devil's advocate with red team rigour — not pessimism, but evidence-based critique across three phases: diagnostic (are claims accurate?), creative (is the problem artificially constrained?), challenge (are solutions robust?). Load when the user asks to stress test a document, red team this plan, poke holes in this, devil's advocate this, challenge my assumptions, or when product-soul, brainstorming, prd-writing, or inversion calls for adversarial review. Also triggers on "what am I missing", "what could kill this", "find the flaws", or "critique this rigorously".

Gracefully retire a skill that is redundant, superseded, or no longer earning its place in the context window. Load when improve-skills finds a skill scoring 0-5/14 AND research confirms the domain is now handled natively by current models, when two skills have overlapping triggers and one subsumes the other, when the user asks to remove a skill, retire a skill, delete a skill, or clean up redundant skills, or when validate-skills flags a skill as a duplicate trigger risk. Handles removal cleanly: updates all callers, removes from AGENTS.md, updates README, and archives rather than deletes so the skill can be recovered if needed.

Sharpens and stress-tests an existing plan file through multiple codebase-grounded review passes, editing it in place and recording every finding and iteration in cross-referenced companion files. Use this skill whenever the user wants to iterate on, refine, tighten, or improve a plan. Also use it when the user asks to verify, validate, or confirm feasibility of an approach. Does not implement plan steps, write test plans, review code, or investigate bugs, and does not generate new plans from scratch — use plan-a-feature for a new plan. Runs its review rounds to completion without pausing between them; to review each round as it lands, use pairing.

When the user wants to conduct, analyze, or synthesize customer research. Use when the user mentions "customer research," "ICP research," "talk to customers," "analyze transcripts," "customer interviews," "survey analysis," "support ticket analysis," "voice of customer," "VOC," "build personas," "customer personas," "jobs to be done," "JTBD," "what do customers say," "what are customers struggling with," "Reddit mining," "G2 reviews," "review mining," "digital watering holes," "community research," "forum research," "competitor reviews," "customer sentiment," or "find out why customers churn/convert/buy." Use for both analyzing existing research assets AND gathering new research from online sources. For writing copy informed by research, see copywriting. For acting on research to improve pages, see cro.

Never show the user a first draft. Run every writing task through a self-critique loop — draft, attack the draft as the harshest reviewer in the room, rewrite, and repeat until a full review pass finds zero flags — then return only the final plus a change log. Use for any writing the user actually cares about: emails, LinkedIn posts, newsletters, docs, announcements, client messages. Trigger whenever the user says 'run the loop', 'self-critique this', 'make it bulletproof', 'don't give me a first draft', 'be brutal', or hands over a task where quality matters more than speed. This is a single-agent loop; for the three-agent version use the-team.

proptest — property-based testing for Rust (Hypothesis-style). Generates thousands of random inputs to find counterexamples to invariants, with shrinking to minimal failing case. Critical for crypto, parsers, state machines, and finance code where edge cases matter. Includes strategies (gen functions), regression tracking, and integration with cargo test. Alternative: quickcheck (simpler API, less powerful). USE WHEN: user mentions "proptest", "property-based test", "proptest!", "Strategy", "Arbitrary", "shrink", "quickcheck", "regression file", "fuzz-light", "proptest-derive" DO NOT USE FOR: Generic Rust unit tests - use `testing/rust-testing` DO NOT USE FOR: Fuzzing with mutator (cargo-fuzz, AFL) - use bitcoin/testing/fuzz DO NOT USE FOR: KMP property testing - use `testing/kotest` (has built-in property)

Search, scrape, and interact with the web via the Firecrawl CLI. Use this skill whenever the user wants to search the web, find articles, research a topic, look something up online, scrape a webpage, grab content from a URL, get data from a website, crawl documentation, download a site, or interact with pages that need clicks or logins. Also use when they say "fetch this page", "pull the content from", "get the page at https://", or reference external websites. This provides real-time web search with full page content and interact capabilities — beyond what Claude can do natively with built-in tools. Do NOT trigger for local file operations, git commands, deployments, or code editing tasks.

Evidence-based investigation of issues, bugs, API calls, integrations, and other aspects of software development that need a deep dive to find the root cause and solutions. Use when you need to debug, troubleshoot, diagnose, or figure out why something is broken. Does not review code for quality or style — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting review feedback to GitHub. Does not assess architectural health or structural risk — use architectural-analysis for architectural concerns. Does not research open-ended options, prior art, or how something works when nothing is broken — use research for that. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.

Look up NHS England genomic tests for rare and inherited diseases. Use this skill whenever a clinician asks what genetic test to order for a condition, which genes are covered for a specific diagnosis, what commissioning category a genomic test falls under (Core, Specialised, or Highly Specialised), or which tests belong to a specialty group (Neurology, Cardiology, Endocrinology, etc.). Also trigger for questions like what panel is used for a condition, whether there is an NHS test for something, what the R number is for a condition, or whether anything has changed in the genomic test directory. Source: NHS England National Genomic Test Directory for Rare and Inherited Disease v9.0 (April 2026).

Multi-source recency research skill that takes the pulse of any topic across Reddit, Hacker News, the open web, and optionally X/Twitter within a configurable recent window (default 30 days). Forcing intake clarifies topic specificity, angle (trend/sentiment/problems/opportunities/comparison), time window, and platform scope before searching. Returns a synthesized briefing with citations, engagement metrics, and cross-platform pattern analysis. Triggers: 'pulse on [topic]', 'what's happening with [topic]', 'what are people saying about [topic]', 'current conversation about [topic]', 'take the pulse of [topic]', 'trending: [topic]', 'find me info on [topic]', or any variation requesting multi-source recency intelligence on a topic. Also use for competitor research, trend discovery, tool comparisons, and audience sentiment analysis.

Runs an evidence-based investigation of a bug, failure, or unexpected behavior with investigate and publishes the resulting investigation report to a user-specified Confluence location. Use when the user wants something debugged, diagnosed, or root-caused AND the findings posted to a Confluence space or page. Requires a configured Atlassian MCP server. Does not investigate to a local file only — use investigate. Does not publish an arbitrary existing markdown file — use markdown-to-confluence. Does not document an already-understood feature to Confluence — use project-documentation-to-confluence. Does not plan or specify a new feature to Confluence — use plan-a-feature-to-confluence. Does not publish to Jira — use work-items-to-jira.