Results for “pr-review”

Reviews a video rough cut by generating deterministic metrics, critiquing the edit against brief and blueprint, and producing review_report.yaml and review_patch.json artifacts.

Convention audit and pre-PR code review for Sage/Acorn projects — checks PHP Blade JS CSS against Sage/Acorn/Tailwind v4 conventions; audits ACF Composer field patterns, Livewire component structure, Eloquent models, Acorn routes, Blade components; verifies design alignment; dispatches sage-reviewer agent; prepares code for PR merge. Invoke for: "review before PR", "run sage-reviewer", "convention audit", "/reviewing", "check my block for issues", "pre-merge review", "review this code". Skip when: you just need to read or understand a file — that is not a review session.

Review and apply GitHub Copilot suggestions on pull requests. Trigger when reviewing PRs with Copilot suggestions.

Perform code reviews following Sentry engineering practices. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or providing feedback on code quality. Covers security, performance, testing, and design review.

Simulates a full multi-reviewer journal review PANEL — 5 personas (Editor-in-Chief + 3 peer reviewers + a Devil's Advocate) debate a manuscript and produce a consensus Editorial Decision (accept/minor/major/reject) plus a prioritized Revision Roadmap. Modes: full, re-review (verify revisions addressed prior comments), quick, methodology-focus, Socratic guided. Use for: simulate peer review, mock review panel, editorial review before submission, multiple reviewer perspectives, re-review of a revised manuscript, or 'critique my paper hard'. For a single-reviewer referee report use alterlab-peer-review; for rubric/grade scoring use alterlab-scholar-eval; to write/revise the paper use alterlab-paper-writer. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Reviews a PR or diff through three independent lenses—correctness, security, and test coverage—then deduplicates and validates findings before persisting them, reducing noise while catching more real bugs.

Automates PR review and CI auto-fix for GitHub and GitLab using the Composio CLI. Pulls diffs, fetches failing job logs, posts review comments, and loops fix commits until checks go green.

Review and refactor code according to project-specific coding guidelines and instructions.

Runs five parallel review agents on code changes, validates findings, triages them, and applies approved fixes after confirmation.

Runs an adversarial code review with two blind judges analyzing the same code from opposing perspectives to find flaws before production.

Generate a PR description from the current branch's changes against a GitHub PR, using the gh CLI. Use when writing, drafting, or updating pull request descriptions, PR summaries, or PR bodies. Does not review code or post review comments — use code-review for local review or post-code-review-to-pr for posting a review to GitHub.

Provides code review best practices, checklists, and example feedback for quality, security, performance, and maintainability.

Clinical copy-editor that reviews text for communication issues. Use when user says review for prose or improve the prose

Clinical copy-editor that reviews text for communication issues. Use when user says review for prose or improve the prose

Clinical copy-editor that reviews text for communication issues. Use when user says review for prose or improve the prose

Reviews pull requests and local diffs against Google's eng-practices code review guide (design, complexity, tests, naming, comments, style, consistency, documentation, every-line, context) and emits a ranked, principle-tagged finding list with rich local diff rendering. Optional follow-up step posts selected findings as a GitHub PR review. Invoke when the user says "googly-eyes this PR", "review by the canon", "principled code review", "Google-style review", "review this CL", or pastes a PR URL and asks for a code review. 👀

Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin. Analyzes PRs for complexity and risk, checks code quality for SOLID violations and code smells, generates review reports. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, identifying issues, generating review checklists.

Review code for quality, security, performance, and maintainability following team standards. Use when reviewing pull requests, examining code changes, or when the user asks for a code review. Triggers on diffs, PR references, or explicit review requests.

Conduct systematic literature reviews by searching multiple academic databases, synthesizing findings, and generating professionally formatted documents with verified citations.

Enforces a principal-engineer self-review checklist on every code block before output, covering correctness, performance, security, naming, and testability.

Use to staff and schedule QA reviewers for sustainable throughput without grading quality collapsing — fatigue, drift, and false precision from treating reviewers like production agents. Trigger for "how many QA reviewers do we need", reviewer capacity planning, grader fatigue, throughput per reviewer, calibration after long shifts, or scores drifting over the course of a day.

Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something

Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something

Perform a Cynical Review and produce a findings report. Use when the user requests a critical review of something

针对 Modular RAG MCP Server 项目的老师式复习 Agent。按章节带领用户系统复习项目知识点，每道题互动问答、给出参考答案，复习结束后记录掌握进度，每次开始时回顾上次进度并建议继续或复习。Use when user says '复习项目', '帮我复习', '带我复习', '开始复习', '项目复习', 'review project', 'study review', '学习复习', '复盘', or wants to systematically review and study the project.

Resolves legacy references to the pr-review-expert capability by routing to the current runtime agent or skill.

Review protected asset policy and risky local data surfaces.

Internal architecture and change-impact review assistant for this repository.

Review, triage, validate, and discuss ClawHub GitHub issues and pull requests with structured evidence, best-fix analysis, and maintainer handoff.

针对 Modular RAG MCP Server 项目的老师式复习 Agent。按章节带领用户系统复习项目知识点，每道题互动问答、给出参考答案，复习结束后记录掌握进度，每次开始时回顾上次进度并建议继续或复习。Use when user says '复习项目', '帮我复习', '带我复习', '开始复习', '项目复习', 'review project', 'study review', '学习复习', '复盘', or wants to systematically review and study the project.

Review pull requests following Sentry engineering practices, covering security, performance, testing, and design.

Extract Amazon product reviews by ASIN using the BrowserAct API, returning structured data including ratings, text, reviewer info, and verified purchase status.

Provides reviewer-style audit and deep review for academic papers in LaTeX, Typst, and PDF formats, producing structured issue bundles, pass/fail gates, and revision roadmaps.

Reviews code files for accessibility (WCAG 2.1) and visual design issues, providing prioritized findings and fixes.

Structural editor that proposes cuts, reorganization, and simplification while preserving comprehension. Use when user requests structural review or editorial review of structure

Structural editor that proposes cuts, reorganization, and simplification while preserving comprehension. Use when user requests structural review or editorial review of structure