Results for “behavior-design”

Conducts end-to-end user research, from study design through behavioral insight synthesis, using frameworks like Nielsen's Heuristics, SUS, and User Journey Mapping.

Design motivation systems using Autonomy, Mastery, and Purpose (AMP) for products and teams. Use when the user mentions "intrinsic motivation", "gamification isnt working", "team incentives", "autonomy", "mastery", "purpose-driven", "employee engagement", or "reward systems". Also trigger when designing onboarding progression systems, fixing broken gamification, or building team structures that sustain high performance. Covers why carrot-and-stick fails and how to build progress systems. For habit-forming product loops, see hooked-ux. For retention behavior design, see improve-retention.

Generate, review, and optimize natural language instructions for Business Central agents (Designer or SDK). Triggers on: agent instructions, InstructionsV1.txt, InstructionsV2.txt, MEMORIZE, qualification rules, agent behavior, instruction keywords, agent task instructions, iterate instructions, or improve agent accuracy. Follows the Responsibilities-Guidelines-Instructions framework with official BC agent runtime keywords.

The practice of collecting, analyzing, and acting on data to drive product decisions. Great analytics isn't about dashboards—it's about insights that lead to action. Every metric should answer a question that changes behavior. This skill covers event tracking, metrics design, dashboards, user behavior analysis, and data-driven decision making. The best analytics teams measure what matters, not what's easy to measure. Use when "analytics, metrics, tracking, dashboard, funnel, cohort, retention, events, KPI, measure, data, insights, conversion, engagement, analytics, metrics, data, dashboards, tracking, funnels, cohorts, KPIs, insights" mentioned.

Run a reproduce → isolate → verify debugging workflow for concrete bugs, regressions, flaky failures, and environment-specific behavior. Use when the user already has a failing command, test, request, UI flow, or narrowed symptom and needs root-cause diagnosis or fix verification rather than raw log-line selection, broad test-policy design, PR review, or generic performance tuning.

Use for writing, reviewing, debugging, or testing Python Streamlit apps, especially rerun behavior, widget identity and callbacks, session_state, cache_data/cache_resource, forms, fragments, containers, multipage navigation, uploads/downloads, and Streamlit-hosted chart/table interaction. Do not use for standalone Plotly/Altair figure design, generic backend services, Dash apps, or deployment configuration without app code.

Optimize prompts via process goals (controllable behavioral instructions) rather than outcome goals (sparse end-result demands). Grounded in sports psychology meta-analysis showing process goals (d=1.36) vastly outperform outcome goals (d=0.09). Use when designing prompts, optimizing LLM steering, implementing CoT/decomposition patterns, or building automatic prompt optimization pipelines. Instantiates surrogate loss paradigm for discrete prompt space.

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

Discover what customers truly need by analyzing the "job" they hire your product to do. Use when the user mentions "customer discovery", "why customers churn", "what job does this solve", "competing against luck", "product-market fit", "switching behavior", "milkshake moment", or "functional vs emotional jobs". Also trigger when investigating why users choose competitors, designing features around real customer needs, or reframing product value propositions. Covers JTBD interviews, competition analysis, and jobs-oriented roadmaps. For product positioning, see obviously-awesome. For rapid validation, see design-sprint.

Use when the user wants to design, redesign, shape, critique, audit, polish, clarify, distill, harden, optimize, adapt, animate, colorize, extract, or otherwise improve a frontend interface. Covers websites, landing pages, dashboards, product UI, app shells, components, forms, settings, onboarding, and empty states. Handles UX review, visual hierarchy, information architecture, cognitive load, accessibility, performance, responsive behavior, theming, anti-patterns, typography, fonts, spacing, layout, alignment, color, motion, micro-interactions, UX copy, error states, edge cases, i18n, and reusable design systems or tokens. Also use for bland designs that need to become bolder or more delightful, loud designs that should become quieter, live browser iteration on UI elements, or ambitious visual effects that should feel technically extraordinary. Not for backend-only or non-UI tasks.

Restructure existing code without changing its behavior, through a test-gated refactoring loop: a named target, a green suite over that target before any edit, a planned sequence of small named refactorings, and the full suite re-run after every step. Use when the user wants to refactor, restructure, clean up, simplify, or improve the design of existing code, or to apply refactoring recommendations from a code-review or architectural-analysis report. This skill changes code; it does not review code (use code-review), assess architecture (use architectural-analysis), or build new behavior test-first (use tdd). Do not use it on code inside an active tdd loop; the refactor step of tdd owns that cleanup. Runs its planned sequence to completion without pausing for review; to review each named refactoring as it lands, use pairing.

Apply named refactoring transformations to improve code structure without changing behavior. Use when the user mentions "refactor this", "code smells", "extract method", "replace conditional", "technical debt", "move method", "inline variable", or "decompose conditional". Also trigger when cleaning up legacy code, preparing code for new features by restructuring, or identifying which transformation to apply to a specific code smell. Covers smell-driven refactoring, safe transformation sequences, and testing guards. For code quality foundations, see clean-code. For managing complexity, see software-design-philosophy.

Fundamental patterns for effective agentic behavior. Teaches decomposition, tool orchestration, error recovery, context management, quality self-assessment, and knowing when to stop. Model-agnostic principles that make any agent more effective regardless of domain. Activate on: "how should I structure this agent", "agentic workflow", "agent patterns", "multi-step task", "tool orchestration", "/agentic-patterns", "decompose this", "agent best practices", "chain of actions", "when should the agent stop", "agent loop design". NOT for: creating agent infrastructure (use agent-creator), building DAGs (use windags-architect), specific tool implementation.

Turn "what should we pay reps and what number do we give them" into a defensible comp and quota plan. Reconciles a top-down number against a bottom-up build, sets the OTE mix, lays out accelerators, and names the behaviors the plan will drive and the ones it will break. Built for B2B sales leaders, customizable to your motion and your segments. Trigger on "design the comp plan", "set quotas", "what OTE should I pay", "reconcile top-down and bottom-up", "what will this plan actually incentivize", or any comp or quota build.

Use when developing in packages/agent-core-v2 (the DI × Scope agent engine) — adding or modifying a domain Service, choosing a LifecycleScope, wiring DI dependencies, splitting a domain across scopes, owning or migrating a config section, gating behavior behind an experimental flag, raising coded errors, working on the permission system, writing DI/Scope tests, porting business logic from agent-core (v1) to v2, triaging a main-branch commit against v2, or exposing a v2 domain over server-v2 while keeping the /api/v1 wire contract compatible with released clients. Self-contained guide organized by development stage (orient → design → implement → test → verify) plus align workflows for v1→v2 migration, main-branch commit triage, and server-v2 wire exposure; each file carries the rules, examples, and red lines for its step.